Indie Saas Builder. https://xitter.cf/t.co/pwIULsi70W - AI SEO agent https://xitter.cf/t.co/kSM0F6WID5 - AI Code diff viewer prev: FreeText AI / The Review Index / ex-Google search team
internet
Joined October 2008
- Tweets333
- Following909
- Followers428
- Likes768
1. you mentioned before that set targetting "broad". does that mean turning on advantage+ and not having any audience filtering
2. whats your typical cost per conversion in b2b
3. is the configuration single campaign, multiple ad set (with budget set) and single ad per adset?
Abhishek Iyer retweeted
Starting my first SEO experiment:
using acme.bot by @distantgradient to publish a blog post every single day on my new domain
the goal:
- grow organic traffic on autopilot
- build topical authority around app growth, paywalls, and monetization
- attract app founders looking to improve their apps conversion rates
will Google reward the consistency or will I be shouting into the void? 💀
time to find out.
This.
The responses and your content repo IMO is the biggest differentiator between slop and no slop.
The larger the knowledge base grows, the more your content will diverge from generic Wikipedia-like garbage.
(Also slap on a humanizer so that it does'nt get detected as 100% AI)
wonder what happens if you build 500 relevant links to a brand nobody talks about..
my guess is chatgpt still doesnt pick it
Rank tracking is causing havoc.
I wonder how many poor souls would be optimising content for rank trackers just because some Claude skill decided to look at GSC data...
IMO sitemap is a real alpha here..
a batch of new pages usually tells what they're doing even before any announcement
true - real idea "moat" is the conviction around an idea..
one other thing a clone cant copy is the authority of pages already ranking for your category..
Google (and ChatGPT) prefers pages that are old-ish, but updated frequently.
Flip it around - think about it from Google's perspective. What should it trust more, a website that was registered yest, or a seasoned website that keeps its content fresh?
acme.bot/research/ai_answers…
Neil get it other way round (as do many SEO practitioners)
Editing a pure AI draft / outline is a waste of time.
Instead, get an AI to talk / interview you about the subject.
Its much quicker and more efficient if your workflow biases the AI towards your narrative from the first draft itself.
Prompt in. Content out. Publish. Next. I get it. It's fast and it's cheap. But from what we're seeing, the AI models doing the citing favor content written by people. Use AI to research, outline, and draft. Then have a real person write or heavily rewrite what goes live.
#AIContent #SEO #ContentStrategy #DigitalMarketing
mostly the second..
a free tool earns the links and the searches, and the main product rides that authority. few people convert straight from the tool
Free - search console hooked up with Claude etc., it's free and it's the only tool showing what google actually does with your site
For the writing side, i build ACME BOT.. it explains why each page targets what it targets, so you pick it up as you go
Not sure what tool OP uses, but never post pure AI.
Think about it - why would AI cite something it could have written itself.
Always inject human opinion, humanize. Hardly takes time if done right.
(Disclaimer - founder of ACME BOT - AI SEO Agent)
it seems common sense - why would an AI cite something it could have written itself...
I think as the industry is evolving some folks have actually seen pure AI content work, hence the gold rush... unlikely to last in the long run.
the protocol seems to be just the sign in, not even the checkout.
which store the agent goes to is still likely decided by whatever pages it read before it got there :)
cool research. bookmarked.
person's article reads like a review. the brand's reads like an ad... to the model too
Domain authority is not a real signal.
I bet most sites selling links on this marketplace get almost zero organic traffic
Unfortunately, the users for this is likely agencies that are trying to show "proof of work" to clueless clients, and clueless indie-makers.
The grift is high in this one.
xitter.cf/tibo_maker/status/2107…
we sent our first marketplace payouts this week
and I owe our sellers an apology, some waited way too long
quick context:
Aug 25 we opened Outrank's marketplace to publishers
DR 40+ sites with real traffic get paid $1 per DR, per article
6 weeks later:
- 67 publishers have earned money
- $11,913 earned in total
- top earner: $1,232
.. for 1 blog owner 🤯
payout sent now
let's scale this
nice original ad copy... lol
xitter.cf/ihteshamali/status/209…
Semrush charges $139.95/month.
Ahrefs charges $129/month.
A guy named Ben built the open-source alternative that you can run on your computer.
It is called OpenSEO.
Enter a competitor's website and it reveals the keywords bringing them traffic, the pages winning those searches, and the backlinks helping them rank.
And enter your own site and it tracks rankings, crawls technical problems, reads Search Console, and shows whether ChatGPT or Google AI Overviews mention your brand.
Then connect Claude or Codex.
Your agent can pull the real numbers, compare opportunities, cluster keywords, and save a strategy back into the dashboard instead of guessing from a prompt.
The hosted version starts at $10 a month. The entire codebase is MIT licensed, so you can also self-host it and pay DataForSEO directly for only the data you use.
No, it does not magically reproduce every database and advanced feature Ahrefs built over a decade.
But it breaks the most important rule of the old SEO market:
You no longer need their permission to own the tool.
github.com/every-app/open-se…