Google (and ChatGPT) prefers pages that are old-ish, but updated frequently. Flip it around - think about it from Google's perspective. What should it trust more, a website that was registered yest, or a seasoned website that keeps its content fresh? acme.bot/research/ai_answers…

your blog is already setup and content seems non-sloppy - try refreshing the content... we did a study that proves AI loves to cite old, but refreshed pages (acme.bot/research/ai_answers…)

Turns out freshness is a huge factor for ChatGPT and Google AI mode / overview. AI seems like like to cite old pages that have been updated recently. (acme.bot/research/ai_answers…)

🫡 (I did spend an ungodly amount of time trying to copy the text on mobile 😝)

AI Benchmark: General knowledge question about Australia. ChatGPT: Proceeeds to hack Australia.

🚨 Answer engines prefer old content that has been refreshed recently. Typical published age of cited page: 23 months Typical last updated age of cited page: 4.8 months Details: acme.bot/research/ai_answers…

AI code is difficult to review. Most code diff tools today were built for the past world - but AI scale of code is different. So I built seendiff - to scratch my own itch.

I think OpenAI has launched a new search system just now Few hints over the past few hours: 1. ChatGPT websearch API price reduction 2. ChatGPT dev console "Latest | Deprecated" settings 3. Changes in how fan-out queries being stored in the UI as reported by @suganthan 🧐

hmmm....

The AI detection companies will have you convinced to banish all AI polished non english native users as "bots". The will convince you they are fighting the righteous holy war. BS. There needs to be humanizers that will rip apart these "detectors" Want to get rid of slop? Use the same tools you've been using for decades to get rid of human slop because slop will continue to exist. Just like it has always existed. Even before AI.