Recovering pointless argument vegetable.

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Joined March 2019
Yeah, we definitely are still reconstructing dinos in very conservative ways.
1,011
13,122
2,643
190,108
6,736,411
Medieval Dental work was very sophisticated. They understood gold is biocompatible and didn't cause reactions with gums; if anything it had good antibiotic effects. Likewise they had very precise manual cavity cleaning tools, tooth extraction and tooth filling (wax & cement).
Replying to @Knights_Path
A missing lower lip from a sword wound with cowbone teeth held by gold wire would be distinctual and badass!
26
754
14
18,259
623,271
This is actually what worked for STAR WARS (1977), and it fell apart as soon as they demystified everything.
34
292
6
9,127
261,580
Reminder: id Software shipped 6 games in 1991. Makes me think we're doing it wrong...
26
18
1
275
27,006
Can we PLEASE for the love of all that his holy STOP NORMALIZING THIS INSTALL METHOD
383
273
67
6,798
589,178
Replying to @St_Rev
People don't understand how other people lived. They only see how they lived. If their family only eats food from a restaurant once every two months, they think people who eat two restaurant meals a day are rare and weird. You don't learn the percentages unless you study them.
1
30
Theo - t3.gg
@theoMay 19
The worst part of doing dev work on a Mac: .DS_STORE
7
409
4
6,788
264,824
40年以上前のハンガリー発、油絵そのものが動いているようなアニメーション。古い歴史画や騎士絵巻がそのまま躍動する映像世界を、なんと長編映画として成立させてしまった異様な作品。
15
970
38
3,095
118,543
Programmers really really want to believe there's just one little hotspot where performance matters and then they can skip doing their job everywhere else spend 5 fucking seconds thinking about it and you'll realize this is 100% how Windows 11 happened
While the industry is pouring resources into programs without GC (rust), I think the Jane Street OCaml folks have it figured out with OxCaml. Almost all your code paths are cold and GC is net positive. 1% of your code is performance sensitive. Don't create GC pressure there.
17
19
801
58,388
Ex Machina is no longer sci-fi. China has finally built it. The company is AheadForm, founded in Shanghai. The product is the world's most hyper-realistic robotic face. Silicone skin you can't tell from human, 25 micro motors hidden underneath pulling the face into real expressions. And RGB cameras embedded inside the pupils so when it looks at you, it actually sees you from where its eyes are. They raised $28.5M to "give AI a head," which is also where the name comes from. AheadForm = a head form. This is the opposite of where everyone else in robotics is focused. Unitree, Figure, Tesla, Boston Dynamics: all about the body. AheadForm chose the face because they think trust is the harder problem to solve, and trust gets decided at the face. The reason nobody else has tried this is the "uncanny valley." It's the creepy zone where a robot looks almost human but not quite, and looking at it just feels wrong even when you can't say why. Most roboticists believed no amount of engineering could make a face realistic enough to escape it. So they gave up and kept robots cartoonish on purpose: big anime eyes, exaggerated features, clearly synthetic. But AheadForm decided to treat it as an engineering bug instead. Add enough motors, tune the silicone, fix the timing, the valley closes. And they're pulling it off. A few crazy details about how this actually works: 1. The robot learns its own face in a mirror. You put it in front of a camera, let it fire every motor randomly, and it watches what its face does and builds an internal map of "if I send command X to motor Y, my eyebrow does this." Same exact process a human baby uses staring into a mirror. The robot teaches itself who it is by experimenting. 2. It predicts your smile 839 milliseconds before you smile. By watching the micro-tells in your face that precede a smile, the robot starts smiling 0.8 seconds ahead, so its smile lands at the same moment yours does. Most robot mimicry happens half a second late, which is exactly why it always feels artificial. 3. The pupils are the cameras. When the robot makes eye contact, the gaze and the sensor are the same physical thing. Most humanoid robots stick the camera on the forehead or chest, so they aren't actually looking at you when their eyes are pointed at you. 4. The founder, Yuhang Hu, did his PhD at Columbia under Hod Lipson. Lipson is the guy who in 2006 built a four-legged robot that figured out it had four legs by experimenting with its own movement, nobody told it the body shape, it discovered it. He has spent 25 years trying to build machines that know what they are. AheadForm is that 25-year research arc productized. 5. NetEase Games already paid them to physically embody a fantasy video game character. That opens up a brand-new category: robotics as the physical embodiment of fictional IP. Every character-rich studio, Disney, Riot, Hoyoverse, Pokemon, Netflix, now has a question to answer about when their characters get bodies. AheadForm believes whoever ships the first robot you'd actually want around your family wins. That's the bet behind the most realistic robot face on earth.
476
939
332
4,208
538,943
Darrell retweeted
この手のジョークで一番面白かったのは 「転生したらオイラーだった。オイラーの数学上の発見を再現しないと歴史がやばい」
タイムマシンで過去に戻ってペニシリンを自分で発見して大量生産したら大儲けできるのでは! どのくらい過去に戻れる? 教えてAI君! AI「19世紀までです。それ以前ではガラスやゴムが未熟で大量生産できません」
184
2,889
99
29,727
4,349,195
Darrell retweeted
lcamtuf@lcamtufFeb 1
Moltbook debate in a nutshell
173
3,685
128
59,515
1,048,858
Way too relatable.
21
132
14
1,695
52,611
Stay comfy frens.
2
3
33
2,095
I asked the AI for the least inspiring inspirational poster and I weirdly like it
382
1,771
199
26,687
1,049,964
It will never be possible to patch up all the ways these things can be bamboozled into doing stuff they're not supposed to do. Fundamentally unsolvable. It's fun watching everyone try though
24
284
22
19,384
634,486
Darrell retweeted
gpt-4.5 is so good at ideation and creative writing
98
155
31
2,467
215,247
39
542
8
3,411
72,867