Hi, I’ve participated in a lot of documentaries, like 15. I am not reading the @elizabethholmes thing like any of you. I know this is going to upset people, but please at least listen to my reasoning and consider if you are being manipulated in the way this was edited together. I’m not an actress. But when you participate in a documentary, particularly one with moving cameras, you’re essentially on set trying to behave as one. The producers are asking questions to try to evoke an emotion on cue. So you’re essentially having a surreal experience of trying to act your own life. You’re trying to be honest and genuine in what you’re feeling. But the format of what you’re participating requires holding poses, waiting for lights to be set up, repeating takes and giving the producers the emotional sound bites they’re asking for. I think it’s that surreal quality that comes across here. This shot didn’t magically happen. They set it up and she’s obviously been on the set all day trying to answer the same questions. It feels artificial because shooting a documentary is artificial. It only feels natural with the editing later. They have chosen to not do that. I like Nathan Fielder, but if he’s famous for anything, it’s for uncomfortable silence, and forcing his interview subjects to fill it. That’s so clearly what he’s doing in this clip. Again, I’m not an Elizabeth Holmes defender. But I feel like y’all are so eager to see the worst in her, you’re unwilling to consider the total situation.