Developing #causal #tensor framework -TensorFaces, Human Motion Signatures | Alumna @MIT, @UofT | #womenwhocode
Los Angeles and New York
Joined April 2009
- Tweets8K
- Following1.6K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes19.3K
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
The level of entitlement and god complex these people have is unreal.
GenAi developers like, Jason who works at Anthropic, pretend like they were forced to build bad tech. And now that their irresponsible actions are clear and felt in full force, he blames everyone else, while still demanding to be a part of the solution?
True Psychopath shit.
ALT You and your cohorts created this monster. Now you want us to help you clean it up. Jason D. Clinton @ @JasonDClinton-1d as bad as things have gotten in the past 4 days, they are going to get a lot worse before they get better. security leaders, never let a crisis go to waste: please go to your boards and ask for help right now. not for ai, for the basics. (we need to... 1:11pm • 10/22/26 • 88K Views 16 17 36 Relevant v 517 69 个 View quotes › Jason D. Clinton ‹ @Jaso....21h yes. it was always going to be this way. we tried to warn the world.
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
Happened to my son too, at a private school in Dallas. Teacher gave everyone their papers back, but not my son’s and said he needed to see him after class because he didn’t think he had written it, that it was too good. Luckily, Same as you, we didn’t hire a tutor, my husband tutored him and made him write make corrections and rewrite that paper several times, so he had all the evidence. Complete insanity!
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
El historial de versiones del documento. 214 revisiones. Cuatro horas y media de escritura repartidas en tres días, con sus borrados, sus frases a medias y sus pausas.
El profesor lo miró y me dijo que el sistema de detección es muy fiable.
Le pregunté qué margen de error tiene. No lo sabía.
Le pregunté quién había validado ese 97 %. Tampoco.
No denuncié a nadie. Presenté la revisión de la calificación por escrito y adjunté el historial.
Se la corrigieron a la semana siguiente.
Lo que me preocupa no es el cero. Es que a mi hija le dijeron delante de la clase que había hecho trampas, y la prueba de que no era así la tenía yo en una pestaña del navegador.
Están usando una máquina para acusar a adolescentes sin saber cómo funciona la máquina.
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
Hinton isn't warning about a virus; he calls AI "alien beings".
The moment you drop consciousness down to "virus-level," the entire sci-fi rogue AI takeover narrative collapses into standard biosecurity and cyber-risk management.
Real risks (claims 1 and 2) require biosecurity, cybersecurity, containment, and accountability, not apocalyptic panic over digital overlords.
Hinton isn't warning about a virus; he calls AI "alien beings".
The moment you drop consciousness down to "virus-level," the entire sci-fi rogue AI takeover narrative collapses into standard biosecurity and cyber-risk management.
Real risks (claims 1 and 2) require biosecurity, cybersecurity, containment, and accountability, not apocalyptic panic over digital overlords.
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
(4/4) The first two claims (social harms and corporate negligence) are observable and warrant concrete institutional responses. Neither establishes the third.
Claims of consciousness require plausible causal mechanisms, supporting evidence, explicit assumptions, and falsifiable tests.
Hinton’s scientific contributions deserve recognition. However, his ideas and arguments must stand on their own evidence, not his authority.
A Nobel Prize establishes past achievement, not the validity of future predictions.
(4/4) The first two claims (social harms and corporate negligence) are observable and warrant concrete institutional responses. Neither establishes the third.
Claims of consciousness require plausible causal mechanisms, supporting evidence, explicit assumptions, and falsifiable tests.
Hinton’s scientific contributions deserve recognition. However, his ideas and arguments must stand on their own evidence, not his authority.
A Nobel Prize establishes past achievement, not the validity of future predictions.
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
(3/) To evaluate AI risk, we need to untangle three very different claims:
+ ML amplifies real social harms (bias, disinformation).
+ Corporations deploy systems irresponsibly.
+ Machines will become or are conscious superintelligences that destroy humanity.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
Every year I think we should start a back to basics and how to baseline talks because it always comes back to the same stuff.
Check configs, patch, scan, and know your environment.
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
I get the feeling that the secret that Anthropic and OpenAI have been trying to keep from the public is just how easy it is to create a frontier model (given money and compute, to some degree).
Proof of this is how quickly Meta and Grok have been able to launch models that are close to the frontier.
Further proof is that GLM and Kimi aren't far behind, and without all the 'safeguards' become immensely more valuable to both attackers and defenders.
So, it's starting to appear that all the FUD about AI safety and calls for regulation were really to try to create a moat for OpenAI and Anthropic that would give them a chance to survive in a work where frontier models become commodotized.
That world looks like it's much closer than I previously thought - feels like this is all going to manifest in less than 6 months.
Good for us all in the long run - bad for Anthropic and OpenAI who wanted to be the category king without any competition.
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
Yea like the ea ai doomer crowd wants to be like “we saw this coming” go read a fucking cybersecurity forum from the early 2000s. The lessons are always the same
M. Alex O. Vasilescu retweeted
Fix your shit. Don’t ignore patching, rotate API keys, have OAuth, remove users that are no longer with the company that still have accounts in SaaS tools. Don’t ask me how I know that one lol
