@firegiantco CEO & Co-Founder | Benevolent Dictator of @wixtoolset | https://xitter.cf/t.co/Irqq1LMRJj for more information

Redmond, WA USA
Joined March 2008
Same. Gave the bag of food to the same shelter we adopted him from. Six months later, we adopted two kittens. It was too quiet. :)
Needed to return an order to @Chewy b/c one of my cats passed away and it was an autoship of food that was just for him, and they offered a refund without returning the food. They suggested donating it to a shelter or friend. Can’t tell you how much that meant to me 💗
161
This is false. Copyleft isn't about scarcity or the One Ring. Copyleft is about freedom. And we should question anyone who wants to take those freedoms away.
The entire copyleft licensing regime was built for a "software is scarce and precious" world that no longer exists. But watch the old guard cling to these obsolete rites like a pre-reformation priest to a Latin Bible.
1
6
429
Question for my fellow business people: Do you get multiple unsolicited offers to fund and/or buy your company everyday? I wake up to half a dozen of these emails everyday. I get a dozen text messages a week offering me business loans. Anyone else getting this type of spam?
4
1
436
Same. I liked what Deno was building but didn't see how it was sustainable, so I never built on it (chicken/egg, I know). So, now will have another test of OSS maintenance. Does the project die or does "many eyes make maintenance shallow"?
I'm really curious if Deno as an Open Source project will manage to stay around.
104
Rob Mensching retweeted
free software used to be $150 plus postage
Everyone loves open source no one pays for it
2
3
1
47
1,186
Rob Mensching retweeted
Imagine if everyone who wanted The Winds of Winter to come out faster started just writing chapters themselves and sending them to George RR Martin and asking him to include them. That's what it's like being an open source maintainer right now.
16
28
7
636
20,787
Rob Mensching retweeted
Replying to @robmen @trevorlasn
Exactly. OSMF lets maintainers activate procurement via a simple EULA on official binaries. Source stays fully FOSS and free to build; the fee hits only revenue-generating orgs above the $10k threshold. Individuals stay free. WiX already proves it works at scale with hundreds of sponsors. Solid complement to automatic registry royalties.
1
151
I wish YouTubers would use their influence to help maintainers rather than always resorting to scare tactics. There is nuance to this problem. YouTubers could help explore the realities AND get the facts right. If they wanted to. But nuance and facts probably don't get views.
Polly is becoming a paid library. Microsoft.Resilience is still free to use. Since .NET 8, integrating resilience into your applications has become much simpler. There's a new Polly API surface and official Microsoft resilience libraries. Polly is a .NET resilience and transient fault-handling library. Polly allows us to define resilience strategies such as: - Retry - Fallback - Timeout - Rate-limiting - Circuit breaker Want to learn how to use Polly to create resilience pipelines? I wrote an in-depth article with everything you should know. Learn more: milanjovanovic.tech/blog/bui… Polly recently introduced the OSMF at $20/mo I believe. But this only applies to direct dependencies, which Microsoft.Resilience isn't. The whole --- P.S. I built this AI programming pack for Clean Architecture to make your life easier. More than 10,000+ developers are already using it. Get it here (it's free): milanjovanovic.tech/template…
1
7
1,859
Rob Mensching retweeted
So, I dug into my mistake more tonight. The RPL is truly a piece of work. It weaponizes OSS. That is its purpose. It's the mirror image of the OSMF. It is amazing. It absolutely has no place in a library.
1
1
256
Be like Rob (Johnson... not me, I don't talk about myself in the 3rd person 😉). Don't spread FUD. And when you see those "influencers" stirring up trouble for clicks, tell them to be more like Rob too.
Replying to @robmen @edandersen
I'll give it my best shot... 🙏
1
260
Yeah! Why not both? :) This is actually a nice write up about the OSMF from the .NET Foundation.
Maintainers need sustainable funding. Consumers need clear, predictable terms. Both can be true. The .NET Foundation’s statement on Open Source Maintenance Fees (OSMF): pro.dnf.cloud.sitefinity.com…
3
325
Daniel over here with the receipts. This is why I don't understand why people keep telling me the OSMF will not work. It already does.
Replying to @robmen
And for those thinking it can't possibly work, let me remind you @wixtoolset went from 71 sponsors to 353 in a year, and according to Grok and the sponsorship tiers, that's an estimate of ~7k-12k a month. xitter.cf/kzu/status/19610749115…
3
250
First they tell you it's too expensive, then they tell you it's too cheap. But if they would stop and think through all of the options, they'd see how the OSMF threads a very narrow needle. I'm happy to explain why the OSMF works the way it does to those with an open mind. :)
I am always for open-source charging money, but if you're gonna make a library paid, at least make it more expensive. The barrier isn't the price; it's procurement. This is way too cheap for the logistical nightmare something like this would be for a company.
2
1
8
1,353
I have mixed feelings about Cloudflare acquiring VoidZero. I like Cloudflare but I hoped to see Vite be "enough" to fund its own development. I felt the same with Astro. robmensching.com/blog/posts/…
1
2
3
275
Going to take a break from here. Given the algorithm, I expect no one will really notice. :) Building a lot this summer. Be back when I have something to show for it. Given the algorithm, I expect no one will really notice. :) You can find me at robmensching.com
1
5
164
Grace. That's the word. Our discourse today could use more grace. Well said, Maggie.
I don't work on reliability & scaling at GitHub, but the people who do aren't bad at their jobs. They're dealing with unprecedented scale from agents. It's easy to shit on GitHub from the outside if you're not in charge of 30X-ing capacity within a few months. Have some grace.
1
182
I find much of the discourse around GitHub discouraging. The world changed on them faster than most. They need to improve to handle it. They know they need to improve. Everything suggests they are working on it. Punching them while they do so is not productive, IMHO.
Being the foundation for millions of developers means our bar must be higher for availability, reliability, and security. I’m sorry it’s been a rocky stretch at GitHub. We know we need to do better. Today we published an update on two recent incidents: one on April 23 involving merge queue behavior, and one on April 27 affecting pull requests, issues, projects, and search-backed experiences. We’re taking this seriously. We’re listening, and you have my commitment that we’ll communicate more frequently about the work underway to improve reliability and scale GitHub for what comes next. github.blog/news-insights/co…
1
4
570
How does one post with such conviction and a completely flawed understanding about the fundamentals about which they are talking? I think I need to leave for a while. The state of things here makes me sad.
This is such a complete misunderstanding of how complicated it was to do this within Microsoft when he did it. Plotting telemetery is one thing. Getting the largest software vendor, at the time, to coordinate that all software within needs to play nice with this one tool is not.
191