This letter was addressing Helvidius’s writings on the Virgin Mother. The entire letter from St. Jerome is just fire to paper

Run for office on the single policy of requiring American customer service for all companies.

Why? To tell her it’s wrong to be mean to gay frogs?

It’s good when we do it, bad when they do it. I thought you knew the rules.

My wife said she didn’t like the idea of selling indulgences and I almost called the inquisitors

Frogs can drive?

If you’re going to provide a source for your skepticism maybe don’t use the guy no one respects and says blatantly false stuff even about Mormonism.

Of course, there always is with something that old. The evidence just lends itself to more likely than not in my eyes.

My apologies Scott, that’s a study about the fabric and where it’s been showing that it’s from the Middle East. I guess I didn’t realize another study was conducted recently. Here’s the one from 22 showing its age. dsctm.cnr.it/images/Highligh…

vaticannews.va/en/church/new… sciencedaily.com/releases/20… Here’s a Vatican website and a science daily website, as to not appear too bias even though the first site links the study as well.

I also think Mormonism is false, but y’all’s opinion that he was nailed twice is the least of the reasons why. I also dont think two nails vs one really makes a difference either.

Seeing as how it has been proven to be from 1st century Judea and the only study showing it’s from the Middle Ages came from testing a repaired portion of the shroud and there’s no technology from that time period that could create such an artifact, I don’t see a forgery.

I call the lunate bone part of the palm, it very much looks to be at the intersection of the Lunate, Scaphoid, and Capitate bones. Which is very much the palm.

You can see the direction the blood is draining in the shroud. It seems to me that you don’t like it because it disproves your position, the same way Protestants don’t like it.

Yes, a blood stain showing the location of the nail wound. It shows the wound being in his palm down towards the base, around the lunate and scaphoid bones. You can see the whipping marks on his arms in that photo too.

Don’t-

Is there a reason they went with just the jaw and now his whole head?

Youll become a byzlarper

I appreciate the push back from you, I’m saying both really. The exact location of where they appear doesn’t matter that much, and they’ve been documented in some instances to be closer to that of the shroud. It’s also hard to say when only four saints in modern times had them.

Again, I don’t really see the location of stigmata’s as important. They’re a mystical experience and the location is likely based on where the individual believes the wounds to be located on Jesus.