🚨 WEBSITE OWNERS: EARN & BURN $LUNC FROM YOUR TRAFFIC 🚨 The StatsBin LUNC Burn Ads Publisher Network is OPEN. 🔥 If you own a website, you can turn your existing traffic into LUNC revenue while helping burn the LUNC supply. 💰 Publishers receive 60% of ad revenue 🔥 20% is used to BURN LUNC ⚙️ 20% supports the Burn Ads network Getting started is simple: 🌐 Verify your website 📐 Choose your ad format 💻 Add a small script - or use our WordPress app for easy integration 👀 Generate valid ad views 💰 Get paid in LUNC Your publisher dashboard tracks views, clicks, CTR, earnings and on-chain payments. And you DON'T need to run a crypto website. 🌍 Any suitable website can apply to become a publisher. The more websites that join, the bigger the advertising network becomes - creating the potential for more publisher revenue AND more LUNC burned. 🔥 Already running WordPress? We've made getting started even easier with our WordPress app. 🚀 ✅️ Sign up your website here👉 statsbin.com/lunc-burn-ads/p… Got traffic? Turn it into LUNC. 🔥 Main Burn Ad page: statsbin.com/lunc-burn-ads #LUNC #TerraClassic #WordPress #Webmasters #Crypto #Advertising #StatsBin

🚨 𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 #𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗔𝗧 𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗞! 🚨 Terra Classic is trying to move forward with a crucial software upgrade, Core v4.1.1, under Proposal #12233. And what does the validator calling itself "BINANCE 🔶 CZ" do? ❌ Votes 𝗡𝗢 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗩𝗘𝗧𝗢! ❌ Uses the governance transaction memo to accuse Juris of being a scam! ❌ Provides no technical justification for opposing the upgrade in that memo! 𝗔𝗕𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗨𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗬 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗘𝗙𝗨𝗟! A validator's responsibility is to help secure the blockchain, assess upgrades on their technical merits and act responsibly with the voting power entrusted to them by delegators. 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗠𝗘𝗔𝗥 𝗖𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗔𝗜𝗚𝗡! If there is a genuine technical or security concern with Core v4.1.1, publish the evidence. Explain the risk. Give the community something substantive to evaluate. Otherwise, why use a software upgrade vote to attack an unrelated project? 𝗠𝗬 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗜𝗦 𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗥: Validators who repeatedly abuse their position, undermine legitimate development and refuse to provide meaningful technical explanations for critical votes should not expect delegators to keep them in the active validator set. Delegators have the power to redelegate. Use that power to demand accountability. And let's be clear: calling yourself "BINANCE CZ" does not establish any official connection to Binance or CZ. 🔎 Proposal: statsbin.com/governance/1223… 𝗧𝗛𝗘 #𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦. @cz_binance @binance #TerraClassic #LUNCCommunity #CryptoGovernance #Validators

🚀 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗞 $𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗟𝗜𝗞𝗘 𝗡𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗥 𝗕𝗘𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘! 📊 The #LUNC community deserves accurate market data, clear statistics and transparency. That's exactly what we're building at StatsBin! 📉 𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗘 & 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗘𝗧 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 ✅ Live LUNC price in USDT ✅ 24-hour price movements and percentage changes ✅ 24-hour trading volume across tracked exchanges ✅ Volume-weighted market performance ✅ Mobile-friendly dashboard with easy access to market statistics 𝗡𝗢 𝗛𝗬𝗣𝗘. 𝗡𝗢 𝗚𝗨𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞. 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔. Whether you're a trader, investor, validator or long-term holder, you deserve the tools to understand what's actually happening in the Terra Classic market. 💻 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆. 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲. 🔗 statsbin.com/lunc-chart #LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto #StatsBin #BINANCE

🚨 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗜𝗦 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗘 #𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗬? 🚨 I'll put my hand up. 𝗜 𝗔𝗠. 👋 I've spent YEARS operating validators, maintaining infrastructure, contributing to governance and building tools for Terra Classic. 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗜 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗗? ✅ StatsBin - FREE analytics, burns, governance, validator votes, wallets and supply tracking. ✅ LUNCAgent - Building AI-agent payment infrastructure for #LUNC. ✅ Validator infrastructure - Running nodes and securing the network. ✅ Governance - Transparent voting, accountability and challenging questionable decisions. ✅ Validator KYC - Advocating ownership transparency and accountability. 𝗕𝗨𝗧 𝗜'𝗠 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗢𝗡𝗟𝗬 𝗢𝗡𝗘! 👏 Let's recognise the developers, validators and projects contributing to Terra Classic. 🔧 𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗗𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗣𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 @ColeStrathclyde - StrathCole @frag_dude - L1 development @luncgoblins - Development and infrastructure Plus GeoffreySHD, hoank101, TropicalDog17 and BInodes-official for Core contributions. 🛡️ 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦 & 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗥𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 @Allnodes @LunaStation88 @InterstakeOne @VegasMorph @BInodes_ @LunaClassicNode @orionstaking @firefiuk @Interstellounge @TerracVita @StatsBin @ClassicNodes ....plus over 70+ more... this isn't exhaustive... *BARE IN MIND, the infrastructure bit is only a few validators! 💻 𝗗𝗘𝗙𝗜 & 𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬 @JurisProtocol @Terraport Terraswap LUNCdash Galaxy Station CL8Y DEX StatsBin.com 📊 𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗬𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗦 Validator.Info LuncScan Terra Classic Tech StatsBin.com 🎮 𝗚𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚 @TerraCasino_io Repeg Club BruteMove! Lunc Zombie @garuda_defi @HTML5Arcade StatsBin.com/games 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘'𝗦 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗦. Historical contributions deserve credit, but they don't prove someone is still building TODAY. Judge everyone by actual results: ✅ Code and upgrades ✅ Working applications ✅ Reliable infrastructure ✅ Transparent governance ✅ Genuine community contributions Running a validator matters, but collecting commission isn't the same as developing tools and maintaining infrastructure. 𝗜 𝗗𝗢𝗡'𝗧 𝗡𝗘𝗘𝗗 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗥𝗘𝗧 𝗕𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗦. I don't need an echo chamber or to silence anyone questioning my narrative. 𝗜 𝗕𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗗. 𝗜 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥. 𝗜 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗠𝗬 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞. Am I always right? No. But my contributions are public and open to scrutiny. Stop labelling legitimate builders scammers without evidence while treating empty promises like gospel. 𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗡𝗘𝗘𝗗𝗦 𝗕𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗦, 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗙𝗔𝗟𝗦𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗛𝗘𝗧𝗦. Judge me on what I've built, delivered and how I've voted. Apply the SAME standards to everyone. The blockchain doesn't care about your Telegram following. It records what you actually do. 😉 🌐 statsbin.com ❤️❤️❤️.....SORRY IF IF MISSED ANY OF YOU OUT! .... there's so many great people,I cant keep tabs 😫 (not gp or relevant asociates!) #LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #DeFi #Blockchain

🚨 𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗡𝗣𝗘𝗔𝗖𝗘 & 𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗔 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗞𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘: “𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬” 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗔 𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗘𝗟𝗗 🚨 @Greenpeace06_09 @_JCH01 Demanding accountability from everyone else means accepting scrutiny of your own arrangements. Greenpeace’s published explanation says he created the Four Families fund, staked its coins with Luna Strike Force BNB, and plans to distribute them when LUNC reaches $0.20. He also stated: “From this point on, I will not vote with this wallet.” That statement deserves considerably more scrutiny than a shrug and another accusation against critics. ⚖️ 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟 𝗨𝗦 𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗟 𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗜𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗦 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘. California Business and Professions Code §17510.8 establishes fiduciary duties in covered charitable solicitations and requires contributions to be used for the declared charitable purposes. California’s Attorney General also explains that charitable-asset oversight can extend to individuals holding funds for charitable purposes. Being outside a registered 501(c)(3) does not automatically place someone beyond scrutiny. Separately, the FTC has taken enforcement action over crowdfunding misrepresentations where money was used differently from what contributors were promised. These are examples of legal principles, not a finding that either of you has broken those laws. Jurisdiction, fundraising terms and the evidence determine whether they apply. 🔎 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗬. 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗟: Who controls the wallet? Is the fund kept separate from personal assets? What terms were donors given before contributing? 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: What authority permits staking the donations, and what were donors told about the risks and the $0.20 distribution condition? What happens if that price never arrives? 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗕𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗙𝗜𝗧: Luna Strike Force, disclose what commission, if any, this delegation generated, whether any was returned, and your involvement in the arrangement. 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘: Explain how voting with the fundraising wallet served the fund’s stated purpose. Publish the terms authorising that use. 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗙𝗘𝗘𝗦: Publish the transactions and identify who paid. If donations or the fund’s rewards paid for governance votes, disclose every amount and the basis for charging it to the fund. A small fee still requires an explanation. “I will stop voting” does not account for previous activity. Staking and voting are not automatically illegal. But neither is a private key a licence to disregard promises made to donors. For clarity, these questions concern the Four Families fund, which Greenpeace describes separately from direct donations to St. Jude. 𝗠𝗬 𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪: demanding trust while leaving these questions unresolved is unacceptable. Before lecturing the LUNC community about everyone else’s integrity, publish the fundraising terms, the accounting and the transactions behind your own arrangement. 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗔 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗗 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗘𝗘𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗦. 📌 Fundraising explanation: xitter.cf/Greenpeace06_09/status… 📌 Voting statement: xitter.cf/Greenpeace06_09/status… 📌 California AG: oag.ca.gov/charities/laws 📌 California §17510.8: law.justia.com/codes/califor… 📌 FTC crowdfunding enforcement: ftc.gov/news-events/news/pre… #LUNC #TerraClassic #LUNCGovernance #BINANCE #USTC

🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪 #𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗔𝗟 - #𝟭𝟮𝟮𝟯𝟯 🚨 Terra Classic Core v4.1.1 is now up for voting! This is an important software upgrade addressing several issues affecting network reliability and functionality. 🔧 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗦 𝗜𝗧 𝗙𝗜𝗫? ✅ Stuck transactions that could block accounts. ✅ Two potential crashes within the tax module. ✅ Restores functionality for affected vesting accounts. ✅ No state migrations, new modules or parameter changes. 📅 𝗞𝗘𝗬 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦 🗳️ Voting closes: 19 October 2026, 12:29 UTC. ⛓️ Upgrade height: 31,010,600. ⏳ Estimated chain halt: 26 October 2026, approximately 15:00 UTC. ⚠️ 𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦 If approved, ALL validators must coordinate their upgrade to v4.1.1 at the specified block height. Failure to upgrade in time risks your node falling behind the network. 𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗦 Maintaining a reliable, secure and functional blockchain requires continuous development, bug fixes and responsible validator participation. This isn't about token price speculation. It's about keeping the underlying infrastructure working properly. As a #LUNC validator, I support addressing these technical issues and encourage fellow validators and delegators to review the proposal and participate. 📊 Track voting, validator decisions and the live upgrade countdown on StatsBin: 🔗 statsbin.com/governance/1223… #TerraClassic #LUNC #USTC #BINANCE

#LUNC 💪🔥

🚨 𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗖 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗬 - 𝗪𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗨𝗣! 🚨 𝗜𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗔 𝗖𝗢𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗠 𝗖𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗔𝗜𝗚𝗡 𝗧𝗢 𝗥𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗚𝗣? Look at what's happening on X. At least 11 different accounts have published posts reportedly containing the same core message calling for GP to be reinstated. One account even posted it twice. That's 12 posts with matching messaging, plus additional variations. 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝟭𝟮 𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗢𝗣𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦. Identical wording across multiple accounts raises legitimate questions about whether a prepared message is being circulated through Telegram and copied onto X. And if people are being instructed what to post, the community deserves to know. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗦 𝗜𝗡𝗩𝗢𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗗: @geminishibaluna @salmanjoyia139 @alex_kuleba @thinkdomm @sinhooguerreiro @Maddog198500 @Miguelon171717 @Oothmernumer @Jackdogy @Samanas69 @lunckat There are also shorter variations appearing in the same wave. Any of the above accounts or new ones that call any legitimate project, dev or validator on lunc scsmmers, are welcome to have their names included in a class action lawsuit for defamation. Be warned! 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘'𝗦 𝗠𝗬 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗚𝗘: Supporting GP is your choice. But copying a prepared statement doesn't make the underlying claims true, and repeating something across multiple accounts doesn't turn it into independent evidence. The #LUNC community should be asking questions, examining evidence and thinking independently, not simply amplifying a narrative because it appears popular. 𝗪𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗨𝗣. 𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗖𝗞 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗦. 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗞 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗙. A coordinated message is not the same thing as community consensus. #LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #BINANCE

🚨 𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗩𝗘𝗧𝗢 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗡𝗣𝗘𝗔𝗖𝗘 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗗! 🚨 Am I surprised? Absolutely not. 🤦‍♂️ Greenpeace UNITED, ranked #8 with 36.14 BILLION $LUNC staked and 3.99% voting power, has voted 𝗡𝗢 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗩𝗘𝗧𝗢 on Proposal #12230. 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗔𝗟 𝗗𝗢? It migrates Hyperlane infrastructure contracts to address an upstream duplicate-signature-counting bug. This is a technical fix intended to improve the reliability and security of infrastructure supporting the #LUNC ecosystem. 𝗦𝗢 𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗩𝗘𝗧𝗢? A veto is not simply a disagreement. It's the strongest form of opposition available in governance, with consequences for a proposal's deposit if the veto threshold is reached. If Greenpeace has identified a genuine security vulnerability, technical flaw or legitimate reason to veto this migration, then publish the evidence! 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗨𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗛𝗡𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚. Validators are entrusted with billions of delegated $LUNC. Their governance decisions should be based on technical understanding, evidence and the interests of their delegators. Disagreement is healthy. Unexplained vetoes on infrastructure fixes deserve scrutiny. 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦: Are you happy with how your voting power is being used? 🔗 validator.info/terra-classic… #LUNC #TerraClassic #Governance #Hyperlane

🎮 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗚𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗦𝗕𝗜𝗡! 🚀 Fancy a break from staring at #LUNC charts? 😂 You can now head over to the StatsBin Games section and start playing 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 games directly from the page - no purchase required. 🎮🔥 And this is just the beginning... We’ll continue expanding the games section and adding more titles for the Terra Classic community to discover and play. 👾 Play 🎮 Discover new games 🆓 FREE to play 🌕 Built into the growing StatsBin ecosystem Got a game you think belongs on StatsBin? Tag the developer below or reply with the game 👇 👉 statsbin.com/lunc-games 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗚𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗦𝗢𝗢𝗡... 👀 #LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #BINANCE

🚨 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗪𝗘 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗢𝗡𝗘... JESUSisLORD and JESUSisLORD 2 have BOTH voted NO on #LUNC Proposal #12230. Combined voting power shown: JESUSisLORD 2 - 4.35% JESUSisLORD - 4.17% 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝟴.𝟱𝟮% 𝗼𝗳 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝗢. And the reason given for either vote? 𝗡𝗼𝗻𝗲. This proposal migrates 13 governance-owned Hyperlane contracts to code containing the upstream fix for a known duplicate validator-signature counting issue. If you're going to use more than 8% of #LUNC governance voting power to oppose a technical security fix, I think delegators deserve to know 𝗪𝗛𝗬. What exactly is wrong with the migration? Which contract should not be migrated? What is wrong with upstream fix #142? What technical risk does passing #12230 create? 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗡𝗢. But when you're carrying billions of delegated $LUNC and wielding this much governance power, explain the reasoning - particularly when you're opposing a proposal fixing identified infrastructure code. This is exactly why governance transparency matters. 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 - 𝗽𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲. Your stake gives them that voting power. #LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #BINANCE

🚨 𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗔 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗞𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘 𝗕𝗡𝗕 - 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗔 𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗛𝗡𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗢 𝗩𝗢𝗧𝗘 𝗡𝗢 🚨 Luna Strike Force BNB has voted NO on #LUNC Proposal #12230 with 0.95% voting power. Their memo? "In order for me to vote Yes, I need the people who ask for the votes to answer public questions on X..." But what does any of that have to do with the code being voted on? 𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. Proposal #12230 is not about personalities. It is not about arguments on X. It is not about whether somebody answered your questions. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗶𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝘅 𝗮 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗛𝘆𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗴. The proposal migrates 13 governance-owned Hyperlane infrastructure contracts to code containing upstream fix #142. The issue being fixed is 𝗱𝘂𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿-𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 in the multisig ISM. That is what validators are being asked to assess. If there is a technical reason to oppose #12230, publish it. Show the problematic code. Show why upstream #142 should not be deployed. Show what security or operational risk the migration creates. Show the better technical solution. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 "𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝘆 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗫 𝗼𝗿 𝗜 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗡𝗢" 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. Validators inherit the votes of delegators who do not vote themselves. That makes governance voting a responsibility, not leverage for settling disagreements on social media. At the time of checking, #12230 stands at: 🟢 YES: 70.89% 🔴 NO: 22.07% ⚫ NWV: 0.14% 🟡 ABSTAIN: 6.90% Quorum has been reached and the pass threshold is currently reached. 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗮𝗹. 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲. 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗰. Don't hold a technical fix hostage because somebody didn't give you the response you wanted on X. #LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #BINANCE

There’s 𝗡𝗢 𝗗𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗔 in #LUNC from me. I’m here to build, run StatsBin, support the chain and call things as I see them. But if I see 𝗕𝗨𝗟𝗟𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗧, expect me to call that bullshit out. Not with rumours. Not with personal attacks. Not with made-up narratives. With 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗦, 𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗘𝗜𝗣𝗧𝗦 & 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘. 🔎 Validators, influencers, projects, exchanges - nobody should be above scrutiny. If something is good for #LUNC, I’ll support it. If something doesn’t add up, I’ll question it. ⚠️ And if you’re sitting there worried that you might be next... Well, maybe ask yourself why. 😉 #LUNC #BINANCE #USTC #COSMOS #USTR