The #Hyperlane payment proposal has only 12 hours left.
We changed our vote from "Abstain" to "Yes," as the community submitted detailed and verifiable data (although we still have concerns about the transparency and independence of the validator changes).
The #BiNodes validator node still has a significant amount of self-delegation (ranking 3rd globally).
We are still here.
Hope everything turns out well.🙏
terra-luna:native
The @terra_money ecosystem is one that has certainly had a difficult past. But that hasn't stopped the $LUNC community from trying to rebuild something of significance... ⬇️
bsc.news/post/terra-classic-…
🚨 [#LUNC Community Notice] Vote YES on Proposal #12230
This proposal patches a duplicate-signature counting vulnerability (Upstream #142) in the Hyperlane cross-chain contracts.
While support is currently at 99.84% YES, turnout is only 6.98% (far below the 40% Quorum required). The proposal is at risk of failing due to insufficient participation!
👉 Vote here: binodes.com/finder/govdtl?pr…
terra-luna:native
Why Terra Classic's LUNC used to be called LUNA
In May 2022, Terra's UST stablecoin lost its dollar peg. Terra voters then passed Proposal 1623 to start a new chain without UST, which went live at the end of that month.
The new chain took the Terra and LUNA names, starting from block zero with no shared history. Holders of the old tokens received new LUNA by airdrop.
The original chain became Terra Classic, with LUNA renamed terra-luna:native and UST renamed $USTC. Terra Classic kept running as a community-run chain, with terra-luna:native as its native token.
Data shows that LUNC has recently seen a significant rise in attention from various high-weight accounts.
terra-luna:native
Never forget where you came from. You are stronger now... ;)
#LUNC #TerraClassic #LUNA #Ethereum terra-luna:native
Terra Classic doesn't rely on outside oracles; it votes on its prices
Most blockchains buy price data from services like Chainlink. Terra Classic has its validators do the job themselves.
In each short voting round, validators submit exchange rates for terra-luna:native. The chain lines up all the answers and picks the middle one, with bigger validators counting for more. Validators who land close to it share in the oracle reward pool.
A vote too far from that median counts as a miss, and so does a skipped vote. Validators who miss too often in a set window lose part of their stake and get jailed, which drops them from the active set.
Per validator(.)info data, 86 of 87 active validators voted in the latest round.
If you judge by Core repository development activity:
#LUNA: basically no GitHub updates for two years.
#LUNC: still actively upgrading in 2026:
Jan — Cosmos SDK 0.53
Mar — v14.1 mainnet upgrade
Apr — IBC / Wasm updates
Sep — security updates
Two years of silence vs. continuous development in 2026.
If you had to choose one, which would you pick?
terra-luna:native $LUNA
He appears to have considerable confidence in the future of terra-luna:native : after contributing 150 million in taxes, he has also staked his holdings.
Transaction HASH:
20868B670A4F77C84C76C4141ED0626F8629AACABE57EBED10E250AD274A4890
or
binodes.com/finder/tx_hash?h…










