Advanced Practitioner Physiotherapist. Passionate about MSK, exercise and for my sins Man United. Advocate for health professionals.

Croydon, London
Joined January 2015
Replying to @thecsp
You said the same about 3.3% last year. Yet nothing was done. This was accepted.
1
4
111
Your taxes would barely change because these groups use the most NHS care. Plus then you would have to sort your own healthcare. It would be more expensive for you. Unless you subsequently take care away from those groups which is unconscionable.
If you are on £25,000 salary per year, £700 of your taxes goes to the NHS annually If you are earning £40,000 £1,650 of your taxes goes to the NHS annually If you are earning £75,000 £4,500 goes to the NHS annually Private healthcare would be far cheaper for ALL of us. Imagine not seeing a doctor this year but you’ve paid over £2,000 towards the NHS…. Imagine not getting a doctor’s appointment yet you are paying thousands of your taxes into a service which can’t see you. I think we should scrap the NHS and create a much smaller organisation which ONLY assists 🔹Those above 60 🔹New Mothers 🔹children up to 18 🔹Long term disabled Everyone else can pay for private healthcare Premium private healthcare is cheaper. Those who are on low income can pay a discounted private healthcare which will still be cheaper than what we are throwing at the NHS. Stop worshiping the NHS which is a black hole of wastage.
82
Who would have guessed it....
6
Replying to @cityzenken_
It's not all about transfer fees my friend. Ipswich town could have affordes the transfer fee, but Donnarumma wouldn't be impressed with the wages.
2
51
Replying to @Maadali10891426
Yeah.... Course
91
The best thing about the Dunning-Kruger effect is most people don't understand it There's no mount stupid. The original paper has a more linear shape, and measures perceived knowledge Vs actual knowledge People who use this graph are showing the Dunning-Kruger effect in action
1
1
23
Someone get the guys in Stockley park a rule book.
#MUNMCI – 59’ VAR OVERTURN VAR checked the referee’s call of no goal for offside – and determined that Haaland was in an onside position and recommended that the goal was awarded. The VAR also deemed that while in an offside position, Fernandez didn’t play the ball.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Per IFAB Law 11, a player in an offside position can be penalised for clearly attempting to play the ball (or other obvious actions) if it impacts an opponent, even without touching it. thefa.com/football-rules… x.com/TheIFAB/status…
1
234
Replying to @Parody_RCGP
From the superdrug website
97
AI helped make this graph when you adjust per ED attendance. Rates are level (possibly even lower than 10 years ago) except COVID year when presumably less people were going to ED.
1
19
Triage issues means sometimes they see things they can't deal with but evidence and anecdotes say this is happening appropriately.
1
71