Pinned Tweet
Submit
Reject
Submit
Reject
Submit
Reject
Submit
Reject
Submit
Reject
Submit
Reject
Submit
Revise
Resubmit
Resubmit Major Revisions
Revised Minor Revisions
Revised because Typos
Accepted
Grumpy Reviewer retweeted
I'm far less cruel than this professor as I let my students wipe their eyes on the exam paper
Hey, Reviewer 2! Wake up.
xitter.cf/gcabanac/status/176757…
🤖 So #ChatGPT wrote the first sentence of this @ElsevierConnect article. Any other parts of the article too? How come none of the coauthors, Editor-in-Chief, reviewers, typesetters noticed? How can this happen with regular peer-review? pubpeer.com/publications/CAA…
From @RetractionWatch to ResignationWatch.
xitter.cf/aaronsibarium/status/1…
For those keeping score at home, this is the fourth research misconduct scandal at Harvard in just one month.
-Claudine Gay resigned Jan 2 after half of her work was found to contain plagiarized material.
-A couple week later, Dana Farber, a Harvard teaching hospital, retracted or corrected 37 papers by its top executives.
-Earlier this week, Harvard chief diversity officer Sherri Ann Charleston was accused of plagiarism and data fraud.
-And now, a top Harvard neuroscientist has been accused of falsifying data in 21 different papers.
Grumpy Reviewer retweeted
One of the VPs screwed up so now we need everyone in the college to take a new online training module.
Do tell... xitter.cf/CSProfKGD/status/17466…
Uh oh.
"Why Research Fraud Is Getting Worse" by @waltxyz writing in The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal buff.ly/3uAAMQU
If you think that rattling off quotes from Greek philosophers is the right way to do a land acknowledgement, then maybe you're not the right person to do it.
And @ass_deans is standing on a ladder, testing out her new camera, purchased with the repurposed coffee fund.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Inhale some helium before reading #Reviewer2's comments out loud.
Gotta be bad when even Reviewer 2 can't be bothered to read your paper.
Manuscript rejected after 3 months because the journal couldn’t find ONE single reviewer. I hear this is an increasingly common issue across journals.
Academics, if we’re not supporting each other to move our fields forward, what are we even doing?
@AcademicChatter
Grumpy Reviewer retweeted
The professor moral panic over ChatGPT will subside when they all start using to write letters of rec.
The rest of you suck.
it's the second day of 2023 and the most prolific author of all time already has 4,458 citations this year.
scholar.google.nl/citations?…

















