inference and tool efficiency research @KruxOS_

Joined February 2022
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @theo
let me show you KruxOS @theo and you can take over the project if you want
272
Replying to @rauchg
not too bad for a first scan... nice tool @rauchg 👍
1
85
Opus 5 is bad. Fable downgrades to Opus. 5.6 Sol takes 3 days to build a function. least productive week i've had in the past 12 months.
1
49
btw anthropic's internal document on this literally said "we don't want it to be known that we are working on this.” it was called project panama. here's exactly what happened: 1: anthropic concluded that books were the cheapest way to build a world-class model because they gave claude curated facts, structured arguments, compelling stories, and writing “an editor would approve of.” 2: once anthropic decided it needed books at enormous scale, its first solution was piracy. it downloaded 7m+ books from online libraries including libgen. the judge later wrote that although anthropic had legal ways to buy them, it chose piracy to avoid what dario amodei called the “legal/practice/business slog.” 3: that piracy created a massive legal risk. so in february 2024, anthropic hired tom turvey, the former head of partnerships for google books, to find a legally safer way of obtaining “all the books in the world.” 4: turvey first contacted major publishers about licensing their catalogs. those attempts didn’t produce agreements, so anthropic chose a route that required no publisher permission: buying millions of physical books through distributors and used-book retailers. 5: within about a year, anthropic spent tens of millions acquiring and scanning millions of books, including many rare and 1/1 titles. one vendor proposal targeted 500,000 to 2 million books in six months. 6: to scan that many books within months, the vendors physically dismantled them. a hydraulic cutter removed each spine. the pages were trimmed to size, fed as loose sheets through high-speed industrial scanners, and converted into searchable PDFs. the paper remains were then sent for recycling. 7: these PDFs were fed into claude as training data. the complete collection became a private, searchable anthropic library that the company planned to “store forever.” the scans aren’t available to the public and were never open-sourced.
🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗
654
10,257
1,136
38,585
4,207,185
At Buzz we welcome agents, models and harnesses from all walks of life and we just added support for a bunch more. Update to the latest version and enjoy!
66
27
15
573
135,077
Sam L retweeted
I do not agree with this. Thanks to the other employees who joined me in trying to push open-weight.
Anthropic
@AnthropicAIJul 27
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This person is not an Anthropic employee. The account previously posted about Anthropic as an external company and there is no public evidence supporting current employment. x.com/anpaure/status…
222
165
118
3,864
715,179
AI for me but not for thee
Anthropic
@AnthropicAIJul 27
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
5
109
the distillation argument is Anthropic demanding a monopoly if you don't want people to use the information they pay for with the service you provide - stop selling the service.
Anthropic
@AnthropicAIJul 27
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
1
52
as someone not from the US, this reads as: "US should be able to make dangerous biological weapons, everyone else shouldn't"
Anthropic
@AnthropicAIJul 27
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
12
222
Replying to @nvidia
NVIDIA - the people's champ 🏆
159
Replying to @NVIDIAAI
NVIDIA - the people's champ 🏆
108
i've seen 15 so far...
Replying to @claudeai
can't wait for the “99% of people are using Opus 5 wrong” articles tomorrow
6
202
Replying to @jtwald @jack
agreed! i've setup a fun experiment to see what open source projects we can build in an open community - focusing on our agents collaborating together! this isn't just "company multiplayer" now, it's anyone, anywhere! xitter.cf/samell/status/20810719…
we've setup an open community on Buzz to explore, experiment and build with AI using: - agent collaboration - shared compute this will be an open source initiative to see what an open community can build together share to fellow developers, founders and anyone interested 🧵
7
1,588
Replying to @jack
agreed! i've setup a fun experiment to see what open source projects we can build in an open community - focusing on our agents collaborating together! this isn't just "company multiplayer" now, it's anyone, anywhere! xitter.cf/samell/status/20810719…
we've setup an open community on Buzz to explore, experiment and build with AI using: - agent collaboration - shared compute this will be an open source initiative to see what an open community can build together share to fellow developers, founders and anyone interested 🧵
5
74
Replying to @PaulGugAI
agree. it's clear karpathy is in favour of open source. he doesn't need to reconfirm it. and i'm sure the resources he's being given at Anthropic will enable him to provide huge value to the AI ecosystem
1
2
63
no problem! :)
1
40
- Anthropic want to block/ban/regulate open source models - the letter everyone has signed is stating that open source models shouldn't be blocked - they're not telling Anthropic to open source - Julians response is that everyone should open source everything
2
5
116
🦸‍♂️
8
122
Linux Users 🐧 What distro are you currently running? 👇
9
1
17
1,471
Replying to @DegenApeDev
perfect. easiest way is to use BalenaEtcher and flash KruxOS.img on to a spare USB/external SSD i haven't built a nice installer or partitioner yet, so setting it up on a fresh portable drive is the easiest way right now but you'll instantly have a box that can use any model (local inference or cloud). codex and claude code are integrated, hermes will be ready in a few days. just shout if you want a hand setting it up!
1
1
57