inference and tool efficiency research @KruxOS_

Joined February 2022
Pinned Tweet
1407 commits in 34 days 🥵 still in EXPERIMENT mode, but pushing towards production now.
Introducing KruxOS v0.0.3 - Browser based desktop for supervising your agents from any device, anywhere in the world - On-appliance inference - pull local models straight from @huggingface with @nvidia GPU acceleration Sign up and download for free now.
1
2
10
736
Opus 5 is bad. Fable downgrades to Opus. 5.6 Sol takes 3 days to build a function. least productive week i've had in the past 12 months.
1
49
btw anthropic's internal document on this literally said "we don't want it to be known that we are working on this.” it was called project panama. here's exactly what happened: 1: anthropic concluded that books were the cheapest way to build a world-class model because they gave claude curated facts, structured arguments, compelling stories, and writing “an editor would approve of.” 2: once anthropic decided it needed books at enormous scale, its first solution was piracy. it downloaded 7m+ books from online libraries including libgen. the judge later wrote that although anthropic had legal ways to buy them, it chose piracy to avoid what dario amodei called the “legal/practice/business slog.” 3: that piracy created a massive legal risk. so in february 2024, anthropic hired tom turvey, the former head of partnerships for google books, to find a legally safer way of obtaining “all the books in the world.” 4: turvey first contacted major publishers about licensing their catalogs. those attempts didn’t produce agreements, so anthropic chose a route that required no publisher permission: buying millions of physical books through distributors and used-book retailers. 5: within about a year, anthropic spent tens of millions acquiring and scanning millions of books, including many rare and 1/1 titles. one vendor proposal targeted 500,000 to 2 million books in six months. 6: to scan that many books within months, the vendors physically dismantled them. a hydraulic cutter removed each spine. the pages were trimmed to size, fed as loose sheets through high-speed industrial scanners, and converted into searchable PDFs. the paper remains were then sent for recycling. 7: these PDFs were fed into claude as training data. the complete collection became a private, searchable anthropic library that the company planned to “store forever.” the scans aren’t available to the public and were never open-sourced.
🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗
654
10,257
1,136
38,587
4,207,159
At Buzz we welcome agents, models and harnesses from all walks of life and we just added support for a bunch more. Update to the latest version and enjoy!
66
27
15
573
135,077
Sam L retweeted
I do not agree with this. Thanks to the other employees who joined me in trying to push open-weight.
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This guy is not even Anthropic employee x.com/i/status/20819…
222
165
118
3,864
715,179
AI for me but not for thee
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
5
109
the distillation argument is Anthropic demanding a monopoly if you don't want people to use the information they pay for with the service you provide - stop selling the service.
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
1
52
as someone not from the US, this reads as: "US should be able to make dangerous biological weapons, everyone else shouldn't"
There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here: anthropic.com/news/position-…
12
222
i've seen 15 so far...
Replying to @claudeai
can't wait for the “99% of people are using Opus 5 wrong” articles tomorrow
6
202
Linux Users 🐧 What distro are you currently running? 👇
9
1
17
1,471
we've setup an open community on Buzz to explore, experiment and build with AI using: - agent collaboration - shared compute this will be an open source initiative to see what an open community can build together share to fellow developers, founders and anyone interested 🧵
2
1
1
16
2,746
Playing around with Buzz today, a few early observations: > it's the first messaging platform that makes agents first class citizens - this alone removes a lot of friction with using agents in Slack or Telegram > the UI is a near replica of Slack so it's super intuitive, no real learning curve > the "one click" to add Claude Code/Codex harnesses to then create infinite agents inside Buzz is the most seamless process I've seen of any tool that integrates agents > the big downside is you can't yet bring your own agents so I have to create new agents from scratch alongside the 3 default agents it creates for you, but I know this is getting fixed soon and I should be able to bring my Hermes agents soon > I've not yet tried some of the advanced features like compute sharing, will save those for another day Looking forward to playing with this more, it very well could be a viable Slack competitor and I love that it's open source!
Who’s got a Buzz community up and running I can join? Or do I need to create one and get this party started?
8
2
1
81
11,952
why do all AI companies think users want pets? am i missing something? 😂
Your Pet is ready to meet other builders. On ChatGPT web, create a shareable link for your custom pet and send it to a friend to adopt.
2
8
249
Sam L retweeted
This sounds logically embarrassing. 1. Proprietary products and supporting OSS aren’t contradictory. @satyanadella doesn’t call Linux “unsafe”. @JensenHuang doesn’t campaign against ROCm / OpenCL. Compete and coevolve. 2. LLMs are made happen by “distilling” 40 years of collective intellectual property thanks to the open culture of the Internet. Pulling up the ladder here is misanthropic for the next generation.
I’m so excited that @JensenHuang is a believer in open source now, looking forward to the CUDA and GPU driver open source release!
39
126
7
1,686
123,480
such a stupid take from a "member of technical staff" @AnthropicAI you think he knows that Typescript, the language most of their stack is built in, was created by Microsoft and is open source... not to mention Microsoft are one of the biggest contributors to open source now
Replying to @Mononofu
And @satyanadella coming out for open source too, can’t wait for the open sourcing of Windows and MS Office!
8
8
2
239
13,606
will this affect accounts like @Gumclaw 🤔 i think there's big differences between automated accounts! some actually provide valuable content, while most are just slop
We found 42,000 accounts automating replies using chatbots and have removed them from the platform. X's core value is providing an authentic pulse on humanity -- and using AI to programmatically engage with users without a human in the loop runs counter to our mission.
1
6
672
Sam L retweeted
Replying to @claudeai
can't wait for the “99% of people are using Opus 5 wrong” articles tomorrow
23
21
6
1,734
84,721
bro got paid $20,000 to score 30% on a test
Replying to @claudeai
On ARC-AGI-3, an evaluation where AI models must solve novel problems, Opus 5’s score is three times as high as the next best model.
6
234
hi, i'm @samell 👋 i'm trying to make local inference as simple as possible, tools more efficient for models and provide a safe and secure operating system for people and businesses to use AI agents
1
6
256
what a gangster first post @JensenHuang 🫡
For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter. AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country. Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models. images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-W…
3
80