salmon

So why do high-IQ populations stop having babies when they reach a certain tech level? Precisely because high IQs are so valuable. When the combination of wealth and technology from high-IQ men reach a certain level, high-IQ labor becomes the bottleneck. At this point, wealthy industrialists, and indeed entire civilizations, face an irresistible temptation. They can double the size of the labor force, and half the real wages of high-IQ workers while building more, by putting all the women to work. And since women are instinctively compliant with social norms, all you have to do to accomplish this is convince women that society thinks careers are high-status, and children are low status. Both radical feminists and reactionaries both noticed some time ago that when you educate women, they stop breeding. Reactionaries thought this was because women are retarded, and they are genetically programmed to blow up society if you empower them. Feminists thought this was because having kids is horrible oppression, and women everywhere hate it, and have only ever done it because they forced into it by rape and sexual slavery, so the moment you empower them, they stop. Amusingly enough, these are actually the same idea, except written with snarl or purr words. And either way, this idea is wrong. Women don't stop having kids because you educate them. You could send them to finishing school for six years and teach them about matters animal, vegetable, and mineral, along with many cheerful facts about the square of the hypotenuse, and absolutely nothing would change. Except they'd be better conversationalists, and terrific at educating their kids. No, the reason women stop breeding when you educate them has nothing to do with education at all. It's because of what you're educating them FOR. You educate them to put them into the workforce, and once they are in the workforce, you have three things going on. First, they can build careers or have babies, they can't do both. Two, you just told them kids were for low-class, uneducated, barefoot-and-pregnant loser women living in shacks in rural Kansas. But most importantly, three, when they compete with men in the workplace, and have their own incomes, they lose respect for men. Women, whether you like it or not, whether I like it or not, only want to have babies with men they consider their superiors. If they work in the same workplaces as men, they consider those men to be equals, even if his job is "senior multithreaded kernel programmer" and hers is "project schedule kanban board den mother". So what you've done, what high-tech societies always do, is sacrifice their entire futures for one to three generations of increased shareholder value. But hey, we know some really great recipes for seedcornbread.

저 어린게 다 품어주네요.

이거 워라밸 ㅈ됏다는거아니야

트위터에선 성적대상화 엄청 경계하고 싫어하지만 상업예술 전반에서 대상화없이는 대중성있는 팬덤 형성이 거의 불가능영역인듯.. 아무리 좋느를 줘도 무성애자가 만든것 같은 작업은 팬덤형성이 정말 힘들던데

트위터에선 성적대상화 엄청 경계하고 싫어하지만 상업예술 전반에서 대상화없이는 대중성있는 팬덤 형성이 거의 불가능영역인듯.. 아무리 좋느를 줘도 무성애자가 만든것 같은 작업은 팬덤형성이 정말 힘들던데

근데 갑자기 안하던 짓이 하고싶은 사람은 자기 욕망을 잘 들여다 봐야됨. 진짜 욕망하는게 따로 잇는게 그걸 실현하기 힘들 때 엉뚱한 짓을 함. 가령 갑자기 운명적인 사랑을 만나서 몇개월만에 결혼하고 싶던 사람들은 대부분 번아웃 상태엿음.

체중 감량만이 아니라 삶의 거의 모든 영역에서 노력이나 의지는 크게 도움이 안된다는 것이 최근 연구들의 공통된 결론입니다. 노력이니 의지가 필요하다는 것 자체가 이미 근본적으로 문제가 있는 상태이기 때문.

워킹맘은 솔직히 퐁퐁녀라고 생각함