Rāstī rustī
hindustan
Joined March 2019
- Tweets2.4K
- Following312
- Followers160
- Likes3.1K
LOL he’s start takfiring at the very first contact with modernity
Khedive retweeted
يفتح الله على عبده بعد ثلاث اختبارات:
أولًا: ضيق الرزق، رغم السعي؛ ليعلم أنه ليس له من الأمر شيء.
ثانيًا:
Khedive retweeted
Una gatita llamada Scarlett entró cinco veces en un edificio en llamas para salvar a todas sus crías.
Khedive retweeted
Dr. Israr Ahmed’s 30-Year-Old Warning About Seed Control and Economic Slavery
Around 30 years ago, Dr. Israr Ahmed discussed how control over seeds could become a tool of economic domination, threatening farmers' independence and the world's food security.
Was Dr. Israr Ahmed warning about a future in which control over seeds could mean control over food and economies? Watch this thought-provoking talk and reflect on its relevance today.
#drisrarahmed
Khedive retweeted
This is an excellent formula of chaos and destruction of Islam and Muslims.
To allow those with the khawarij ideology to circulate anything they believe is against sharia to be an act of blatant kufr which allows overthrowing the regime!
It is not permissible at all to think like this or lead the country into wars and destruction under the justification that we are protecting Islam, when you are actually decimating it and the Muslims.
Khedive retweeted
ذكر ابن كثير في تاريخه أن السائب بن الأقرع قدم على عمر بن الخطاب ( رضي الله عنه ) يبشره بنصر المسلمين في معركة ( نهاوند ) .
فسأله عمر عن قتلى المسلمين فعد بن الأقرع فلاناً وفلاناً من أعيان الناس وأشرافهم ، ثم قال لعمر :
يتبع
This is an excellent formula of chaos and destruction of Islam and Muslims.
To allow those with the khawarij ideology to circulate anything they believe is against sharia to be an act of blatant kufr which allows overthrowing the regime!
It is not permissible at all to think like this or lead the country into wars and destruction under the justification that we are protecting Islam, when you are actually decimating it and the Muslims.
Khedive retweeted
Il y a 10 siècles l’imam Al Haramayn rahimuhuLah a écrit « Sauvegarde la ummah quand viendront les ténèbres » un manuel de maqasid chari3a pour les musulmans qui vivront aux époques ultérieures sans instances religieuses, d’états musulmans, de gouverneur etc
Khedive retweeted
Cousin marriage is halal. Allah ﷻ permitted it. A kafir born out of a one night stand who was nearly aborted is not going to lecture Muslims about morality
Khedive retweeted
The surest way to minimise this possibility is to marry a woman for whom covering her head is not merely a consciously observed religious obligation, but a deeply internalised conception of feminine modesty and respectability, reinforced by a social milieu in which appearing bareheaded is regarded as shameful and dishonourable.
Indeed, she would herself regard public unveiling with moral disapproval, and actively criticise and police such conduct among other women, thereby reproducing the very social norms she has internalised.
Khedive retweeted
أحد أحفاد القبيلة الذهبية من المغول
وكان زعيم القبيلة الذهبية "بركة خان"قد أسلم عام ٦٥٠ هـ فأسلمت قبيلته الضخمة معه وقاتلوا المغول دفاعا عن الإسلام
قال ابن كثير: كان بركة يحب العلماء والصالحين ، ومن أكبر حسناته كسره لهولاكو وتفريقه جنوده ، وكان يناصح الملك الظاهر ويعظمه
Khedive retweeted
Some Ottoman sufi scholars also made takfir of the Ottoman government for the tanzimat reforms.
The issue with al Sa'ud and Sharif Hussein is not that fighting the Ottoman state was illegitimate, but rather the act of allying with the British against them, fighting alongside British officers, accepting weapons and cash from the British, agreeing to let the British determine their foreign policy, and most importantly, facilitating the establishment of British rule over Muslim populations.
Many Ḥarakīs declare all governments in the Muslim world to be upon disbelief for ruling by man-made, ṭāghūtī legislation. However, an inconsistency arises when one considers how they treat the Ottoman Empire.
Many of them view the Ottoman Empire to be legitimate. They call it the last caliphate. They declare Sharīf Ḥusayn and Ibn Saʿūd rebels against the legitimate caliphate who allied with the British imperialists to destroy it during the Great War. However, this position is a double standard, because the Ottoman government had replaced the Sharīʿah with man-made, ṭāghūtī legislation, the very act they declare modern-day governments to be disbelievers for.
It is said that during the 19th century, Ottoman “Islāmic” jurisprudence regarded interest on loans to be permissible as long as it was not “excessive”. In other words, they made tabdīl of the Sharīʿah — not just istibdāl, which is replacing the Sharīʿah with man-made legislation.
In 1852, a sultanic firman declared that a 12% annual limit on interest was lawful in the Ottoman Empire. In 1864, the firman was amended. The new text explicitly stated that any document which created an agreement under which interest was to be charged in excess of 1% per month or 12% per annum would be rejected by the commercial courts.
In September 1860, a qāḍī in Ruse, Bulgaria, judged over a debt dispute. According to Ottoman law, one of the disputants was obligated to return a debt on interest. The qāḍī explicitly ruled that although this was against the Sharīʿah, since the case was tried under the new Ottoman Commercial Law, the disputant was forced to return the debt on interest.
This is textbook istibdāl which the ʿulamāʾ declared disbelief by consensus, to legislate a law that contradicts the Sharīʿah and force the general population to seek judgement from it instead of the Sharīʿah, thereby giving it precedence over the Sharīʿah.
Yet according to many Ḥarakīs, Sharīf Ḥusayn and Ibn Saʿūd illegitimately rebelled against a legitimate Muslim ruler despite him replacing the Sharīʿah and ruling by man-made legislation, while hypocritically calling for rebellion against all modern-day governments with the justification that they’re disbelievers for replacing the Sharīʿah and ruling by man-made legislation!
