CEO @getqbench. prev: 5th employee @reverb (acquired by @etsy)

Minneapolis, MN
Joined November 2008
Nicholas Evans retweeted
We’re on a roll! Three quarters running as G2’s Momentum Leader in LIMS, plus our first Momentum Leader win in Lab Inventory Management! 🏆🏆🏆 Ready to see why labs trust us as their most mission-critical system? [Link in next post]
1
1
6
474
Nicholas Evans retweeted
👀 We've been working on something pretty big! We're thrilled to share our inaugural industry event for Vertical SaaS CEOs: VSaaS Collective Live!
1
1
2
404
📊 The @tidemarkcap team is excited to share the release of our 2024 Vertical & SMB SaaS Benchmark Report! We collected information from nearly 250 Vertical SaaS operators to provide data that no one has publicly gathered before (e.g., attach rates, revenue lifts for various expansion products, etc.) to help Vertical SaaS leaders make data-driven operational decisions. You can check out the full report below. ⚙️ If you’re a Vertical SaaS leader looking for a more customized consultation where we can guide you through our proprietary data and tailor it to your business priorities and key questions, we'd love to chat with you! You can reach out to us directly or at [email protected].
At Tidemark, we know the opportunity in Vertical SaaS is just starting to unfold. And today, we have some pretty big news to share 👇
1
8
910
Look out! There's a team of business athletes out there making waves in the lab software market. 🥇
🥇 While it isn't quite the Olympics, QBench won the proverbial gold in the G2 Summer 2024 reports. 🥇 We were awarded the Momentum Leader badge and continue to hold the #1 spot on G2's Top LIMS in North America list. qbench.com/blog/qbench-climb…
3
6
234
Nicholas Evans retweeted
If you're a CEO you should always have $50K for a good idea. Don't cop out, don't kill creativity, don't disempower yourself, don't position yourself as a hostage to the budget. "Hey, I've always got $50K for a good idea, so tell me your idea. If it fixes a key problem, I might go find it."
6
3
1
55
14,218
This is the way
Completed our 2nd board meeting where we did a 6-page memo rather than a deck. Has worked so much better than I expected. I highly recommend it. Here is the rough outline for our board memo: 1. Top 3 things going well 2. Top 3 things to improve/watch 3. Main business/user KPI charts 4. 2-3 deep dive topics 5. At the end of each deep dive topic have open ended discussion questions 6. Appendix (pages 7+) - full of the more usual status updates that the board needs to be aware of. Send it out 3 days before and everyone reads it before the board meeting. Spend all the time in the board meeting focused on the most important discussions. Unexpected benefit: I am a lot more proud of the board memo than I was of any of our board decks. The memo is well thought out and structured and explains all our thoughts without needing to be talked over.
3
436
Nicholas Evans retweeted
🙏 My complete guide to Competitor Research and Strategy is out for those waiting. All for free - including every tool, calculator, email/survey copy, etc I use. Enjoy!
really excllent “Complete Guide to Competitor Intelligence & Strategy” by @Patticus that emphasizes customer awareness of competitive alternatives, and related “Market Command Matrix” — super useful & actionable advice. #marketing patticus.com/2023/12/16/comp…
23
19
5
198
58,561
Just had a great convo with someone who recently acquired a testing lab about us helping them get a LIMS in place. Would love to connect with more lab owners/operators to share insights. If anyone on here runs a testing lab, please DM me.
1
3
690
Nicholas Evans retweeted
Pricing is both an art and a science, a balance of growth and profit. There is no right answer or one-size-fits-all approach, so we talked with former @ServiceNow exec Alex Saghatelian about the strategic frameworks you can use and the questions you should ask: 1. Pricing is cross-functional: you'll touch almost all aspects of a company's success. For example, in sales lead motions, there is no perfect list price given deal packaging and discounting at play. In PLG motions, you have to iterate to optimize price points and packages. 2. Pricing should align to value: when pricing and packaging to value, it is critical to keep the customer benefits at the center, with an understanding of their next best alternatives and the degree of choices you provide. Perhaps even more valuable than frameworks is knowing what questions to ask about pricing... Which features to package and price: what is a feature vs. a product? What degree of innovation fencing is reasonable to support the expansion of customer lifetime value? How do you decide what is included in the product package and what is left out? 3. Multi-product value complications: how much should you anchor on pricing and packaging consistency when selling multiple products, each with its own value proposition and value drivers? What if there are multiple customers within a given function or net new functions and buying personas that emerge? How do you use pricing and packaging to facilitate cross-sell across the portfolio? 4. Frequency of pricing changes: as you move into multi-product, when do you raise the level of your pricing across your portfolio lineup? When do you change the unit of measure of the pricing and or introduce a new package tier? If you sell to multiple customers, should you maintain the same pricing levels and structures? How do you move install-based customers along the journey as you make changes—carrot or stick? 5. Other big questions: when you’re launching a new product, do you bias toward simplicity and adoption with the pricing model out the gate, or do you do more diligence to create a durable pricing model that balances simplicity, value capture, and change management? How many packaging choices do you give—a la carte vs bundle vs tiered options? As AI impacts accelerate, how do you quantify the value drivers to support, making it a tailwind vs headwind for growth.
1
1
4
532
Nicholas Evans retweeted
One of the most challenging multi-product questions is how to verticalize GTM. @ServiceNow went with a radical choice: expanding from one to five teams in a month. We interviewed Kevin Haverty, the former CRO and current Vice Chairman, on how they did it. The TL;DR ⬇
1
1
1
2
2,454
If you run a SaaS biz and you do customer interviews to discover insights for product improvements/extensions, here’s a great series of questions to ask: What work is being done in spreadsheets? How frequently? How much time does that take? Who else works with you on that?
1
212
Nicholas Evans retweeted
There is a new tax rule that is terrible for the software industry. Section 174 may make your unprofitable startup owe tons in income taxes! If you hate taxes as much as I do, then you need to keep reading.
2
3
8
1,395
Calling all businesses that invest in R&D. Please sign!
This quoted post is unavailable.
5
704
Workflow gravity…iykyk
This quoted post is unavailable.
3
461
This team is rollin 🙌
QBench earns the top spot in multiple G2 Fall 2023 LIMS Category Reports! See why QBench took home the Best Results badge, Best Relationship badge, and multiple High Performer awards. 🏆 👏 qbench.com/blog/qbench-award…
2
323
Gotta get in the game!
I talked to a super smart 20 year old this week. All the potential in the world, but had a major major flaw in his thinking. This flaw is becoming the most common mistake I am seeing young people make early in their career. Let's break it down:
3
356
Nicholas Evans retweeted
*NEW SAAS BENCHMARKS (n = *1,880*) from @rayrike + @Benchmarkitai before getting into excerpts, wanted to flag *interactive* capabilities here: saasbenchmarks.ai/widget/saa…
2
6
1
39
9,082
My conversation with @davelyuan Everyone says he’s one of the few people to talk with on the topic of building and investing in vertical market software businesses I especially loved the case studies that I’d never before encountered Enjoy! joincolossus.com/episodes/83…
8
14
18
186
122,165