Co-Founder https://xitter.cf/t.co/8dgEgeQd5J
London, England
Joined February 2017
- Tweets15
- Following155
- Followers1.9K
- Likes60
Leo Guillot retweeted
If you’re a scientist and you want funding for appearance-related research, I’ve set up a fellowship program: qoves.com/research/research-…
We can provide funds, you can use our tech if it helps, and we have ~3M followers, so we can help you drum up big samples fairly easily.
Leo Guillot retweeted
Artificial intelligence is surprisingly good at ranking human beauty, but a new study finds it systematically overrates facial attractiveness. The findings suggest that AI might be too polite to be an objective judge of our looks. dlvr.it/TVd1Hq
Leo Guillot retweeted
Our latest research, covered in PsyPost.
Artificial intelligence is surprisingly good at ranking human beauty, but a new study finds it systematically overrates facial attractiveness. The findings suggest that AI might be too polite to be an objective judge of our looks. dlvr.it/TVd1Hq
Leo Guillot retweeted
We ran a study comparing the attractiveness judgments of 2,513 human raters to those of four commercial AI models (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok).
We found that AI models systematically overrate the beauty of human faces, rating most faces as above-average looking.
Read a summary of the study on our website: qoves.com/research/do-ai-mod….
Read the complete paper on arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2609.02512
Leo Guillot retweeted
More masculine faces are not always preferred by women.
Scott et al.'s (2014) cross-cultural study of 962 participants across 12 societies found that preferences for dimorphism (i.e., facial masculinity) vary across societies.
Blue, white, and pink indicate the proportion of each group that chose masculinized, neutral, and feminized faces as most attractive.
Leo Guillot retweeted
Beauty is in the AI of the beholder: MLLMs systematically overrate facial attractiveness
Santiago Grandas, Juan Sebastian Cely-Acosta, Mohit Mendiratta, Shafee Hassan, Macken Murphy
arxiv.org/abs/2609.02512 [𝚌𝚜.𝙲𝚅 𝚌𝚜.𝙷𝙲]
ALT Beauty assessments from Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly popular amongst users, companies, and aestheticians. This raises the question of whether these AI models can accurately reflect human judgments of attractiveness. In a pre- registered exploratory study, we compared the attractiveness ratings of 2,513 human participants to four widely used commercial AI models: Claude, Gemini, GPT, and Grok. Results showed that MLLMs systematically rate faces more favourably and within a narrower range than humans and, at the time of study, do not reproduce human ratings in absolute terms. However, MLLMs exhibit strong correlations with human attractiveness judgments, accurately tracking the rank-ordering of faces. MLLMs may judge faces by different cues than humans; only face age was a predictor of facial attractiveness in both humans and MLLMs, with inconsistent patterns across models for ethnicity and gender. AI models strongly agree with one another, except for Grok, w
Just opened the new Qoves office, which will be welcoming the product and research team.
@qovesstudio
Leo Guillot retweeted
BREAKING:
Superpower is now available for only $199
almost every American spends a few hundred $ per year on things like:
– Netflix
– Spotify
– Amazon Prime
– Dating or meditation apps
– Annual credit card fees
and never thinks twice.
but there has never been an accessibly priced,
canonical consumer membership for the most important thing of all:
YOUR HEALTH.
it’s our goal to build the most valuable, lowest price health membership in America.
and now it’s never been simpler to get started:
– full body health testing (100+ labs annually)
– one home for all of your health records, unified in one place
– a personal health LLM to chat with and make sense of it all
– plus a human medical team + marketplace for anything you need, like prescriptions, supplements, tests, or health answers – all at 20% cheaper than elsewhere
all for only $199.
it pays for itself. it’s taking control of your health.
“But Jacob — I have a bit more budget to spend on my health, this feels too cheap”
feedback we get often.
however it’s our belief the greatest consumer companies are built with low floors ⬇️ and high ceilings ⬆️;
accessible enough to welcome anyone in, yet expansive enough to grow with those who want to invest more deeply.
(eg. almost every American has an Amazon account, half of which pay ~$200/yr for prime, and 30% of which account for 70% of sales. our top superpower member has already spent over $30k on their health within the ecosystem)
this moment has been a long time coming
and couldn’t be more thrilled to unveil it to the world alongside such an incredible team.
ps – we’ve also just launched the mobile app, DM if you’d like the test flight!
Leo Guillot retweeted
IT'S TIME – announcing our most important launch yet.
Superpower is now only $199.
Almost every American spends a few hundred $ per year on things like:
– Netflix
– Spotify
– Amazon Prime
– Dating or meditation apps
– Annual credit card fees
Today, that's true for the most important thing of all.
Your health.
Leo Guillot retweeted
It’s official — @superpower's beta is LIVE!
Over the past 6 months, our waitlist has grown to 100k+
Today, we’re opening to the wider world.
We believe that everyone deserves access to a new form of healthcare.
So, we built @superpower.com
It’s all the things you wish mainstream medicine did but is not able to.
Test your whole body (100+ lab tests, gut, toxins, more).
View all your health data in one place, for the first time.
Access a private concierge clinical team.
All for only $499.
It’s been a long road here – the whole team working 7 days a week, sleeping in the office, making many sacrifices. But it’s been worth it.
Sharing more next week, so follow for updates.
And for early access, comment below and tag friends.
Welcome to a new era of personal health 🧡