@jcanfil

Assistant Professor @CarnegieMellon ■ Fmr @BelferCenter @CFR_org @Princeton ■ PhD @Columbia ■ science & tech competition, arms control, int’l security, 美中关系

New York
Joined November 2009
Pinned Tweet
1/ Technology is always advancing. So what does it take to future-proof the law? My latest research in @IntOrgJournal argues that efforts to maximize legal clarity can actually undermine the law’s resilience. cup.org/4bX6mKJ
9
17
3
56
7,373
52 delegations raised space security at UN #FirstCommittee last week. #Gabon warned of an arms race already underway. The #UK warned of a return to competing diplomatic tracks. Can diplomacy keep pace with military competition? Via @RCW_ reachingcriticalwill.org/ima…
1
7
12
1,046
@mchorowitz and I have found it most helpful to think of every weapon as fitting into one of 5 possible types. There are 3 basic types: unguided, semi-autonomous, and autonomous. Semi-autonomous and autonomous weapon systems can then ea be either supervised or unsupervised
1
7
8
423
jkc retweeted
Why do states wait to govern emerging technologies? In @ISQ_Jrnl, CMIST’s @jcanfil identifies an "opacity trap" in which the mutual secrecy needed for technological competition delays recognition that competition may be counterproductive. academic.oup.com/isq/article…
1
1
112
I've been spending a lot of time thinking about how to talk about international law so the public will listen. With colleagues, I organized a conference on this topic co-sponsored by @CarnegieEndow, @asilorg, and @LexIntl_org. Read all about it here: carnegieendowment.org/resear…
23
2
71
6,154
jkc retweeted
1/ Article now officially out in @ISQ_Jrnl! Every day, we hear about how disruptive technologies are "breaking" international security. AI. Quantum. Biotech. Hypersonics. If alarm bells are sounding, isn't it time to regulate? Yet policymakers almost always wait. 🧵
2
12
1
26
1,530
This is so cool!
Teaching Jurisprudence at Cambridge for the very first time tomorrow! Cannot wait to get the students started on HLA Hart - and move beyond. If you want a flavour of what that’s like, here is a quiz I built last year with Claude. jurisprudence-quiz.netlify.a…
184
1/ Article now officially out in @ISQ_Jrnl! Every day, we hear about how disruptive technologies are "breaking" international security. AI. Quantum. Biotech. Hypersonics. If alarm bells are sounding, isn't it time to regulate? Yet policymakers almost always wait. 🧵
2
12
1
26
1,530
7/ The paradox is that we may need to compete in order to learn that we would have been better off cooperating. By then, the technology we hoped to master may have already found its way into more dangerous hands. Read Open Access in @ISQ_Jrnl: academic.oup.com/isq/article…
1
1
106
Ironically, this paper took a full 9.5 years from first circulation to publication, a fitting fate for a paper on why the problems we see coming can still take years to address. Special thanks to the editors, some great reviewers, and to @sawada_hiroto & @aybukedere for excellent research assistance. Hiroto is on the job market this year! If you're hiring in IR, give him a look!
4
103
🚨 New paper 🚨 Are your participants using AI to take your study? We conducted the first study directly observing AI assistance in online research, spanning 700K+ Prolific submissions. We found very rare, concentrated AI use, but gaps in safeguards. arxiv.org/abs/2610.09279
3
13
3
43
3,044
Finally made it out to Duxford
161
"Given the enormous uncertainty around the development of this technology, what would justify assigning a 10 percent risk, rather than say 30, or even 1 percent?" buff.ly/eBOlGEl
6
8
1,063
"The uncertainty is not just about how likely a catastrophic event would be but also the mechanisms through which those outcomes would emerge." writes @sekreps in her new piece on AI risk. buff.ly/eBOlGEl
9
14
1,509