Are you guys interested in a case study how a clipper from EXPOSURE made 2k$ in just two weeks of clipping? Let me know (FREE)
This could be you in 2–6 months if you take clipping seriously today.
Most people will scroll past this and be in the exact same position 6 months from now.
A few will decide to learn a skill that can actually pay.
I've helped people go from making $0 to their first payouts through clipping, and I'm looking to personally help 100 people who are willing to put in the work.
Comment "COACH" below and I'll DM you the exact roadmap I would follow if I were starting from scratch today.
Life after you start making $300-400 a day with content rewardsw ith only one hour of effort every day
(free guide included)
This quoted post is unavailable.
Jay Shankar retweeted
i gave adaptive ai one prompt and it replaced my entire content team.
here's what the agent does every single day without me touching anything:
- scrapes trending hooks and formats in your niche every morning
- writes ugc scripts, slideshow copy, and ad creatives in your brand voice
- schedules everything across tiktok, reels, and shorts automatically
- personalizes replies to comments the second they drop
- spots your best performing creatives and draft them into a list in your email/slack
- kills what's not converting and scale what is
every step from hook research → booked clients runs by itself.
reply "SETUP" + RT and i'll send you the agent.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Jay Shankar retweeted
8 months ago cluely bought a $375,000 times square billboard.
last month we rented the most famous billboard in canada for $5,000. yonge-dundas square. 24 hours.
then ran the same $5,000 through content rewards the same day.
billboard: 24,311 views
content rewards: 64,562,883 views
$205 CPM vs $0.06
62 people scanned the QR code from the billboard. the creator campaign drove 11,000 clicks. for every 1 person who scanned, 177 people visited through content rewards.
cluely's $375k at that CPM would've gotten them around 1.8 million views. that same budget on content rewards is 6 billion.
we counted the billboard views ourselves btw. installed cameras at every angle around the intersection and ran the footage through a vision model with no estimated foot traffic numbers, actual faces counted.
and this isn't a one off. in 4 months content rewards has run 2,000+ campaigns and delivered 80 billion views for brands. paid out $13,000,000 to creators.
the outdoor ad industry spent decades getting CPMs to $5. creators are doing it for six cents and most brands still haven't noticed.
the billboard ran for 24 hours and it's done. the creator clips are still getting views weeks later.
that's the difference between both.
Jay Shankar retweeted
the AMOUNT of teens about to stumble into political campaign budgets without ever talking to a single campaign official is actually unreal.
trump. charlie kirk. zohran mamdani. spencer pratt for LA mayor.
every single one ran paid clipping infrastructure.
$0.50–$3.00 CPM on content rewards.
$50k bounty pool = up to 65 million verified views.
a $50k television buy in the same market = 2–4 million passive impressions.
that's a 10x reach gap before you even factor in that clipping views are completion views, not background noise.
the creators making $290/day off single viral clips weren't campaign insiders. they were independent contractors chasing bounties. the campaign gets plausible deniability. the creator gets a direct deposit.
$17 billion went into political advertising in 2024. most of it was television buys that nobody watched. the campaigns that won didn't outspend. they out-distributed.
the regulatory frameworks still haven't caught up. the bounty pool paying a teenager in philippines $100 for a clip that hits 400k people doesn't clearly fit any existing disclosure requirement.
this isn't a 2028 problem to solve. it's a 2025 infrastructure play.
the next election cycle isn't far.
Jay Shankar retweeted
i wanna push back on something i've been saying a lot as part of my marketing
"paid ads are dead"
but honestly, they're not.
meta ads still work. google ads still work. for certain objectives, paid is still the right channel
but there's a difference between "works" and "scales"
paid ads are essentially a dial. turn the budget up, get more impressions. fix it with new creatives when it breaks.
but paid has a trust ceiling
no matter how good your creative is, the viewer knows someone paid for them to see it. there's a sponsored tag. there's a label. there's a feeling
that awareness creates friction between the viewer and the message
organic creator content has no ceiling b/c there's no friction
when 500 different people post about your product from their personal accounts, there's no ad label. no sponsored tag. no visual cue that money changed hands
the viewer processes it as "a lot of people are talking about this"
and that perception
is manufactured social proof
and it's something you can NEVER buy through paid channels
you cannot buy the feeling of "everyone is talking about this"
that feeling only comes from volume
hundreds of creators
thousands of clips
even ugc videos
the algorithm picks it up as organic cultural activity and amplifies it
not to mention: a good meta CPM is $20
a good content reward CPM is $0.10
completely different ceilings
that's why brands are pouring hundreds of thousands into this model.
not bc ads stopped working. they most likely always will
but because organic scales in a way that ads never will
and as nick said: if you wanna cover all your bases, do both.
Jay Shankar retweeted
A CHINESE STUDENT ALLEGEDLY TURNED $0.90 INTO $408K ON POLYMARKET WITH A BTC 5-MIN SCALPING BOT
























