futter retweeted
Follow the smoke.
An average petrol car burns around 17,000 litres of fuel over its lifetime.
That’s 17,000 litres of something that has to be extracted from the ground, transported, refined, distributed and eventually burned.
And yet, every time someone wants to convince you that electric cars are bad for the environment, where do they point?
A lithium mine?
Cobalt mining?
They’ll show you pictures of scarred landscapes, enormous mining equipment and mountains of displaced earth.
They’ll tell you about the environmental damage caused by extracting lithium, nickel and cobalt.
And they’re right about one thing.
Mining has an environmental impact and nobody should pretend otherwise.
They’ll happily show you a lithium mine, but strangely enough, they never show you the oil wells.
They never show you the drilling rigs, the leaking pipelines, the gas flaring, the oil tankers crossing oceans or the refineries operating around the clock.
They never mention the energy required to extract crude oil from beneath the ground, transport it thousands of miles, turn it into petrol and deliver it to your local filling station.
And all of that happens before you’ve driven a single mile.
The materials required to manufacture an electric vehicle battery are largely extracted once.
Those materials can remain in the battery for hundreds of thousands of miles, and valuable metals can eventually be recovered and recycled.
An ICE vehicle needs a continuous supply of freshly extracted fossil fuels for its entire working life.
And when that petrol disappears through the exhaust, it doesn’t magically vanish.
It becomes carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, benzene and other emissions.
Burning just one litre of petrol produces approximately 2.3 kilograms of CO2 at the exhaust.
Multiply that by 17,000 litres.
That’s approximately 39 TONNES OF CO2.
And that’s just the exhaust emissions.
It doesn’t include extracting the oil, transporting it, refining it or delivering the petrol.
Meanwhile, the battery materials in an electric car are still physically there, ready to be recovered and used again.
That’s the difference between an energy system built around continuously burning resources and one increasingly capable of reusing them.
Lifecycle studies consistently find that electric cars produce substantially fewer greenhouse gas emissions than comparable petrol cars, even after accounting for battery manufacturing and electricity generation.
In fact, the International Council on Clean Transportation estimated in 2025 that battery electric cars sold in the European Union produce approximately 73% fewer lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than comparable petrol cars.
That’s not 73% less pollution from the exhaust.
That’s across the vehicle’s entire lifecycle, including manufacturing, energy production and driving.
Of course, electric vehicles aren’t environmentally perfect.
But nobody needs to pretend electric cars are perfect to demonstrate that they’re significantly cleaner.
They just need to compare the whole picture.
Where are the pictures of the oil industry?
Where are the drilling rigs?
Where are the refineries?
Where are the tankers?
FOLLOW THE SMOKE.
futter retweeted
Elon has made massive political mistakes and now pays the price.
I've said many times that he should stop all political activities and attempts to influence policy be it national or internationally and focus on his companies, which undoubtedly offer great products and services.
Elon Musk is a genius as an entrepreneur and inventor, but he has never understood history or the basics of politics and has caused massive damage through his interference and actions.
SpaceX is already suffering badly as a result.
Cheri DiNovo@CheriDiNovoOct 18Canada
CanadaConnected via Canada App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Canada announces: Telesat, homegrown satellites, will be expanded and Starlink usage will soon be removed.
This is what every country on earth should do asap.
Replying to @Tactical_Wob @EtienneToGo
wer weiß denn, wie es ohne ihn gelaufen wäre und was ihm persönlich zuzuschreiben ist? Ihr Klugscheißer, ehrlich
futter retweeted
This is what billionaire ownership of the media means:
Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta shut down the No Kings account for hours during the height of their protests.
Meta suppressed accounts supporting Brazil President Lula da Silva in the recent election.
Larry Ellison’s TikTok blocked advertising for a documentary criticizing Elon Musk.
Fight back. Defeat oligarchy. Preserve democracy.
Replying to @grok @ZStadtfux
Hat Europa etwa den Anschluss verloren? Chinesen nennen uns verächtlich „Museum“… 🤔
Replying to @mario_lochner
Oh Gott, ein Kohlenhydrat-Dealer macht schon um 14 Uhr zu! Gibt ja nur eine Milliarde weiterer „Bäckereien“
Replying to @KuestnerK
So viel wie bereits über Trump bekannt ist, das früher das sofortige Karriereende eines US-Präsidenten bedeutet hätte, was sollte er da jetzt noch vor Kompromat Angst haben?
Replying to @Karl_Lauterbach @elonmusk
J'ai vu une Tesla décoller. Et j'ai entendu beaucoup de bêtises.
« Ça ne sert à rien. » « Gadget de milliardaire. » « Qui a besoin d'une voiture qui vole ? »
Personne. Et c'est exactement pour ça que c'est important.
En 1978, Brabham a aligné en Formule 1 une voiture équipée d'un ventilateur géant à l'arrière. Il aspirait l'air sous le châssis et plaquait la voiture au sol. Elle a gagné sa première course avec une avance insolente. Elle a été interdite immédiatement.
Quarante-huit ans plus tard, on y revient. Un système de succion qui colle la voiture à la route et lui permet de passer sous la seconde au 0 à 100.
Personne n'a « besoin » de faire le 0 à 100 en moins d'une seconde. Comme personne n'a besoin d'une Formule 1. Et pourtant : les freins carbone de votre berline, l'hybridation de votre moteur, l'aérodynamique de votre SUV, les palettes au volant — tout ça vient de voitures de course que personne n'utilisera jamais pour aller au travail.
La Formule 1 ne sert à rien. Pourtant elle sert à tout.
En 1973, quand la France a lancé Ariane, l'Europe sortait de onze échecs consécutifs du programme Europa. La presse parlait d'argent jeté dans l'espace. Vingt ans plus tard, Ariane détenait la moitié du marché mondial des lancements commerciaux, et chaque satellite de télévision, de météo ou de GPS que vous utilisez a bénéficié de cette obstination.
Le progrès a toujours la même tête au début : un truc inutile, cher, ridicule, construit par des gens qu'on prend pour des fous.
Ce que j'ai vu à Dallas, ce n'est pas une voiture volante. C'est un châssis, une gestion de l'énergie et une maîtrise des flux d'air que l'industrie automobile mettra dix ans à digérer.
Les applications viendront : sécurité, freinage, stabilité, consommation. Elles finiront dans des voitures ordinaires conduites par des gens qui expliqueront, en 2036, que tout ça était évident.
La question n'est jamais « à quoi ça sert ».
La question est : qui ose encore construire des choses qui ne servent à rien ?
Il y a cinquante ans, c'était nous. La fusée, le TGV, le Concorde, le Minitel.
L'Europe construisait des choses absurdes et magnifiques.
Aujourd'hui, on commente depuis le siège arrière car nous sommes hors course.
Merci @elonmusk de nous faire rêver
futter retweeted
Head of Design at Stripe on how to stop creating zombie UIs
If we only use AI to make the things that we already make, just faster, then we're definitely missing out on the most interesting part.
From my talk at @lennysan’s Summit, here are four ideas for raising the ceiling, not just the floor:
- Have a point of view [5:38]
- Encode your standards into the machine [9:07]
- Don't confuse done with good [12:21]
- Unleash creativity and artistry [16:19]
Full talk here: youtu.be/GLvFTMtw4Jk?si=-5Ts…










