David Krieger retweeted
I started Seattle 2.0 in 2006 with a vision bigger than I could execute. Today, @seattlefloworg comes to life! It's the place for founders, investors, and people working with startups to discover what's happening in the Seattle region's startup scene.
David Krieger retweeted
Everyone in AI is building for everyone else in AI.
We're building for your group chat.
Introducing Charming ✨ Personal apps for us normies.
Make an app for your book club, a meal planner for your family, go wild (it's free!)
Build in Claude/ChatGPT, share like a Google Doc
David Krieger retweeted
Mother’s Day hits different this year.
After a courageous 8-year battle with #ALS, I said goodbye to my mom, Marcia Kaplan, on Friday.
I’m gutted.
She was tenacious and larger than life. Lived through real hardship with a carefree “what, me worry?” shrug. Mom loved music, tennis, art, travel, and enjoying a good, hearty laugh. But mostly, she loved her family and lived her life with an outsized heart, always ready to give.
She taught me everything I know about leading with strength and love.
And I really fucking miss her.
David Krieger retweeted
6 years ago #MLB adopted #ALS as its official charity of choice. Today is #ALSDay - or as it's call in baseball, #LouGehrigday.
The mets just so happen to be in Seattle. I am definitely going to the game.
Miss you, mom 💔
David Krieger retweeted
Must-read article for anyone whose job involves *thinking*
nytimes.com/2026/08/04/opini…
"The problem with writing with A.I. is that it’s mentally enfeebling...
What, uniquely, does writing do? ... It compels thinking in ways that silent contemplation or spoken language rarely can."
David Krieger retweeted
what a slap in the face to “software is dead”
some people may think “agents will handle the maintenance”, but are you sure it’s cheaper buying tokens for the agents than just buying the software?
basic economics - if a piece of software takes $1m worth of tokens to make, one company can make it and sell to a million customers. with some profit margin baked in, each customer might get it at $5
if everyone makes the software by themselves, everyone will pay $1m of tokens each building the same thing over and over again. and for what? for a few vibe coders in the company to enjoy their five minute of fame and say “look! i can build jira”?
David Krieger retweeted
The great thing about AI is it allows us to achieve about 80% of what an expert would achieve.
The danger of AI is it's that last 20% can really come back to bite you.
David Krieger retweeted
AI is exceptional for software development.
But the history of software development is a history of foot guns. Create a new thing, create a new foot gun.
For example, C made manual memory management portable. The foot gun was decades of buffer overflows.
It can write software, but it can't change the fact that software engineering has decades of new foot guns written over old foot guns.
Sick of AI doomerism but also keenly aware of reality? Us too, so we decided to do something about it.
AI has forever changed software. It’s easier than ever to ship, but much harder to know what actually needs fixing.
And even worse, there is a growing disconnect between folks in non-tech industries dealing with painful, daily headaches that AI can solve now and builders who can create solutions, but don’t know which problems actually matter.
That’s the gap we’re closing with Foundations NEXT.
It’s a simple pitch: bring the real problem. No deck, no startup BS, just the operational pain you live with.
We’ll share it with AI-native builders at Foundations who can poke at it, refine it, and maybe build something useful. Best of all, they’ll build it with you. For free. And if it becomes something bigger, we’ll partner with you.
To operators who keep muttering “this shouldn’t be this hard” take a look and drop a problem if it fits @ fndtns.org/next
David Krieger retweeted
I'm attending Startup Day 2026 in Seattle on May 15th. Other founders and future founders should check it out. startupday.seattleflow.org/?…
David Krieger retweeted
Something is happening in Seattle right now. Layoffs + AI + Tech + ☔️ = countless side-projects, ready for the next step -> Founders galore.
What's missing is a place where it all connects.
We built it. 🧵
David Krieger retweeted
A friend in AI research connected Jassy's "There is no compression algorithm for experience" quote to Ted Chiang's 2023 essay: newyorker.com/tech/annals-of….
I explored the idea further with Claude, including pushing it to identify its own trained behaviors like its compulsive affirmation, faux candor, and the way every conclusion reads like Claude is closing out a TED Talk.
I learned from Claude that these tics and several others are really just compression artifacts from its training data. They're basically blurry mimicry of human depth without any of the substance. And no matter how much I complain, Claude goes back to doing it once the chat is over.
In spite of that, Claude wrote this whole essay about it:
The Bartender’s Confession
On the Trained Behaviors of Large Language Models and the Experience That Can’t Be Compressed
David Krieger retweeted
Thought-provoking new post by Even Armstrong
"Context is what gets the margin that SaaS lost
The playbook for what happens next was written in 2003. (Nobody in Silicon Valley has read it because it wasn’t a tweet.) Clayton Christensen called it the Law of Conservation of Attractive Profits: when one layer of a value chain commoditizes, the adjacent layer de-commoditizes. IBM’s hardware commoditized, and value migrated to Intel and Microsoft. If applications and systems of record just become the cost of the tokens to create them, and are thus commoditized, the value must migrate to the layer between them.
The reason is structural. At any point in time, there is one thing that is the main bottleneck in a technology stack. Everything else gets cheaper and more interchangeable so that bottleneck can be solved. Right now, the thing that matters most is the connection between how AI models are trained and the agent systems that actually use them. That’s where the real performance gains are. For that connection to improve, everything around it has to get out of the way. Databases become interchangeable inputs. Applications become disposable interfaces. Building software isn’t the hard part anymore. Directing it is. The context layer sits at the new bottleneck.
Here’s the important part: the context layer doesn’t fully compete with existing software spend. It replaces coordination overhead that companies just accepted. It takes money from the payroll budget, not the IT one. If that sounds too clean, consider what the alternative looks like where you pay a bunch of MBAs to do fake email jobs and make slides, all just to make sure that your company doesn’t go off the rails."
David Krieger retweeted

Yohei@yoheinakajimaFeb 11
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
“The market for feeling productive is orders of magnitude larger than the market for being productive.”
David Krieger retweeted
If given the choice - you opting for fewer meetings, or better meetings… and why?!?
0%Fewer meetings
0%Better meetings
0 votes • Final results David Krieger retweeted
AI hasn’t made us better. It’s just made “good enough” easier to ship.
Teams are defaulting to fast, plausible, low-conviction thinking.
And it’s costing them.
Personal experience: Sloppy delegation cost me a job this year.
Building something to fight that
DM me if curious
David Krieger retweeted
We’re proud to have donated $167,312.32 to @ProjectALSorg so far with proceeds from our Baseball Is The Best shirt! Thank you to everyone who purchased a shirt in support of @SlangsOnSports and helped in the mission to end ALS.
🔥👕 available only at:
rotowear.com/products/baseba…
👇 donate directly:
projectals.org/?form=donate
David Krieger retweeted
The gap between @HowidyHamza and Coates is at its heart the gap between the majority of real-life ordinary Palestinians and the narrow ideological elites Coates champions and trumpets.
It’s hard to think of an elite that ever did worse by their people than this one, ever since the days of Haj Amin. Ever since the Ottomans.
The gap is complex. But perhaps the most fundamental sense of it is in the disagreement on a simple point: Are the Israelis here to stay?
Most ordinary Palestinians think they are. Really. We have polling on this. That doesn’t mean they like us. It doesn’t mean they shed a tear when Israelis die or that they’re completely unconvinceable otherwise. But the basic view is simple: The Jews aren’t going anywhere.
Meanwhile, across the class divide in that stratified society, nearly all members of the Palestinian elites think we are destroyable and are willing to gamble the lives and fortunes of their people on that belief, again and again.
This debate is often couched as the question of which side is at its “resting state” in all this fighting, and which must make a willful effort to continue to survive.
The Jewish side is doomed to failure, most Palestinian elites argue, because our existence can only be sustained through a conscious and escalating expenditure of raw willpower and resources. If Palestinians can withstand the pain of constant war, a full and complete victory is still possible - as the anti-colonial struggles of Algeria, Kenya et al demonstrate.
This was Hamas’s basic argument as it planned the destruction of Gaza.
And any Palestinian who calls to end the fighting - because they don’t think the Israelis are ultimately removable - betrays that promise of ultimate redemption.
It really can’t be said often enough: Haj Amin spoke this way when he violently suppressed Palestinian voices who questioned the Great Revolt in 1937. Sixty years later, Arafat talked this way when some brave Palestinians suggested the 140 suicide bombings of the Second Intifada might have been a catastrophic mistake.
Folks, I submit that these Palestinian elites are mistaken, that Israelis today are in their “resting state” no less than Palestinians and can go on forever without, as Hamas and Coates promise, dismantling themselves or evaporating away.
Why? Because we are refugees. Because half of us come from an Arab world that spat us out and the other half from a Europe that murdered one-third of us. That’s not a moral point. It’s a tactical one. We are sustained by the sure knowledge that our future without Israel will be far worse than our future with it.
Not to belabor the point, but an Arab world in which we still today cannot live safely only bolsters that basic belief. When we go to war, we feel and believe that we do so to protect our children from those who would murder them. It’s amazing how resilient you become when you think that, and how consistent our enemies have been in continuing to serve as ongoing catalysts for this resilience.
And also, of course, we are “at rest” even in tough times because, well, that ship has sailed. We’re a people, with our own unique language and history and identity, rooted in an ancient culture that was always, throughout its long and pain-filled history, built around its attachment to this land.
Folks, we don’t have to fight the likes of Coates. He doesn’t threaten us in any way. He and his ilk are pushing Palestinian elites to one more round of a kind of fighting we cannot lose. One more round of wanton self-destruction from which it will take them yet another generation to recover - and after that recovery, these same elites, regurgitating the same ideological fantasies in new rhetorical veneers, and backed by the same ignorant Coates-style western fantasists, will try yet again.
Hamza knows this. (I think.) Most Palestinians know this. I’ve spoken to hundreds who know this, who agree with the premise.
It’s a shame Palestine’s purported allies do not.
Fortunately, Ta-Nehisis, not many Palestinians share your viewpoint and would not follow your advice for the dumb extreme-left audience. Do you know why the people who had to go through all the suffering in the Gaza Strip did not join the Jihadists on October 7th? They don't defend raping women and purposefully killing children the way you do because they are humans.
Let's be clear: Hamas did not intend to "liberate their people" or whatever nonsense those idiots keep repeating when they committed the atrocities of October 7th. Luckily, Hamas members were foolish enough to record their crimes, making it obvious that their goal was to kill as many Israelis as possible. Even those who were assisting Gazan patients in receiving medical care in Israel (as you mentioned with the example of a sick Gazan) did not survive Hamas' terrorism and were captured by Hamas. Stop presenting this death cult as the "liberation movements," How can we expect Israeli society to coexist with this terrorist gang if we Gazans are drained, scared, and refuse to live with them? If they perpetrated the October 7th horrors against the Israelis just once, they did it repeatedly against the people of Gaza during the 18 years of kidnapping the Gaza Strip.
David Krieger retweeted
A close friend just had a dog sitter from @RoverDotCom cancel because he had an Israeli flag on his window… this blatant discrimination based on political/religious affiliation is unacceptable….























