Kevin Glaeske retweeted
Reminder that the neural impulses that go to the ears rather than eyes are just of a different type.
It's only a matter of time.
For deafness to be cured also.
🚨 THIS IS GOING TO BREAK THE INTERNET!
Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell:
“In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices. Even if you're 100% blind from birth, we're going to write directly to your visual cortex… and you're going to see.”
“And that's just the beginning. In the long term, you'll have ultra-HD resolution and real superpowers: you'll see in infrared, ultraviolet, and even radar. Literally like a superhero.”
The future is no longer science fiction. It's Neuralink.
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
Take a wild leaping guess into the shadows about why no one ever showed you this before.
Tariffs paid for 94.9% of the federal government in 1860 and still 44% in 1913. By 1920, after the income tax arrived, that was down to 4.8%. Today income taxes bring in about 60% of federal revenue, and tariffs were 3.7% in fiscal 2025, up from 1.6% the year before.
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
You want to pay attention to this, especially the 'falsifying lineages' part of it.
Most of the 'Royal Families' of Europe over the past 200 years are not who they tell you or want you to assume they are.
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
The best story I know is the time Groucho Marx was working in his garden.
Approached by a wealthy neighbor who had no idea who he was, with both of them living in a super-affluent community, she confused him for a hired gardener. When she asked him how much the lady of the house paid him, obviously interested in hiring him herself, Marx didn’t miss a beat.
He told her that no money changed hands, but the lady of the house occasionally took him to bed.
Now that might sound like a piece of standard Groucho schtick, but you have to understand, practically no one ever recognized Groucho Marx when he wasn’t working.
His distinctive eyebrows and mustache were greasepaint. His trademark glasses were a prop. He dressed like a normal person of his era, had a bog-standard haircut and had a perfectly ordinary walk.
So until old age, when he eventually grew a real mustache and needed actual glasses, he looked nothing like his vaudeville and screen image.
He was just a plain, ordinary looking person. And in this case, he was dressed down for gardening and was working in the dirt. So there was absolutely no way to tell it was him, a fact he used to hysterical advantage.
And obviously, once Marx made his quip about being paid in sex the woman trying to hire him got the point. Perhaps she was a bit scandalized, but she realized he wasn’t the gardener.
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
3回裏、2死走者なしで4-0とリードを許す場面で、マーフィー監督は9番打者のデビッド・ハミルトンにバントをするよう指示した。
何の思惑があるのか、その一見『意味不明なバント』の真意を読み取れた人はどのくらいいただろうか。その理由をマーフィー監督が明かす。もう本当に勉強になります。
マーフィー監督: ハミルトンにこう言ったんだ。「今日、バントをするんだ」
このリーグの連中は誰もハミルトンなんて知りやしない。彼はこれまでフルタイムの選手として出たことがないんだから。そうだろ?
「リーグの連中はみんな、お前がバント安打数でリーグトップであることは知っている」
彼はバントが特別うまいわけじゃないが、それでもリーグ最多のバント安打を記録している。なぜか? それだけ何度もバントを試みたからだよ。
「バントを転がせば、残りの打席で必ず打てる球が来る。俺が保証するよ」
それで彼は2アウト・ランナーなしの場面でバントをした。ひどいバントだったね。まだ上手くできないんだ。結局、一塁まで一歩半のところでアウトにされてしまった。
そして、その後の2打席で打てる球が来た。投手の心理としては、こんな感じなんだ。「次のチョーリオに回したくない。こいつには甘い球を投げておこう」
そしてハミルトンはそのボールを完璧にとらえた。
(実際に甘い球が来たのですね)
その通り。彼がその球を完璧にとらえたとき、世界で一番驚いていたのはディアスだったよ。「お前ら、こいつは打てないって俺に言ったじゃねえか」って顔でな。
だから、これもプロセスの一環だと私は信じているよ。
********************
この日、ハミルトンはバントした後の打席で、タイムリーとホームランを放ち、4打数2安打2打点と大活躍した。
バントは走者を送るためだけじゃない。ここまで緻密な心理作戦に持ち込める手段なのだと感服です。
#ブルワーズ #ドジャース
BUNTING MANIPULATES PITCHER APPROACH AND SETS THE TABLE FOR FUTURE MOMENTS
With 2 outs and no body on in the 3rd inning, losing 4-0, @Brewers Manager Pat Murphy told #9 hitter David Hamilton to lay down a bunt in a seemingly unimportant at bat.
Why?
Because Murphy knew Hamilton was known for bunting and they could set the table for a future at bat and big moment later in the game where he’d get a pitch to hit.
And that’s exactly what happened.
Hamilton bunted.
Hamilton got out.
But in the 5th, in Hamilton’s next at bat, he got a pitch in the heart of the plate and singled scoring a run and bringing the Brewers within 1.
And in the 9th, Hamilton did it again, homering on a get me over slider and extending the Brewers lead to 6-4.
You bunt to create future moments, and the Brewers did just that.
#BuntLife
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
Uecker knew it was his last game. He would unfortunately pass away a few months later.
The Brewers have to finish the job for Ueck!!!
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
Ueck probably just having an absolute time in heaven watching these boys have this much fun. 🥲 #Brewers
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
ドジャースが負けたのは必然。セイバーメトリクスのバグを突いたミルウォーキーが、戦術・用兵の妙で圧倒した。
①低いバレル率と外野にポトリと落ちるヒット
セイバーメトリクスでは守備位置などの偶然性を排し、「強い打球」を打てる選手を高く評価する。お金をかけてドジャースはバレル率の高い、強い打球の打てる選手を揃えている。当然のごとくホームランも増える。一方でミルウォーキーはリーグでも最低レベルのホームラン数ということからわかるように、強い打球が打てる選手が少ない。なので、2ストライクになるとほとんどの選手が徹底的にコンタクト重視の打撃で、スイングスピードを落として単に当てに来る。ものすごいスローな打球で外野の手前に落ちるヒットが増える。これをやるのは強い打球が打てない安い選手たち。
②過小評価されているリリーフ投手で、上澄みだけ集めるブリュワーズ
先発投手の最高レベルの年俸は上がりまくっている。それは三振がとれて長いイニングが投げられる投手がセイバーメトリクスでは高評価されるからだ。例えば、山本由伸は12年総額3億2,500万ドル(約463億円〜487億円)[投手としてMLB史上最高額・最長契約]で契約している。一方で低評価されているのはリリーフ投手。この低評価されているリリーフで最高レベルの投手を集めたのがミルウォーキーだ。リリーフのいい投手は年間70試合くらいに貢献できる。実はものすごく安い買い物だ。山本はシーズンでは28試合にしか登板していない。
③試合を速く進めるために2回しか牽制できないバグを使って四球やヒットを盗塁で「長打」にしてしまうスモール・ベースボール
いくら試合を速くしようと言っても、3回目でアウトに出来なければテイクワンベースというのはめちゃくちゃに盗塁するほうに有利なルール。セイバーメトリクスでは盗塁の多いチームが得点が多い訳ではなく、したがって勝利に結びつかないという統計データがあった。だから盗塁を試みるチームが減っていき、そんなに盗塁しないからルールも2回しか牽制できないように変えてしまえという乱暴な話になった。これは単なる四球を「長打」に変えてしまえるルール変更。このバグを徹底的に利用したのがミルウォーキー。
この3つのセイバーメトリクスのバグを利用しまくって、低コストでシーズン103勝を上げたのがミルウォーキーの戦略。ドジャースのようにベンチも分析チームも金があるから常識を疑わないチームが負けたのは必然。お金をかけて頭も使わないと頂点には立てない。アメリカン・リーグでも、スモールベールボールをやるタンパベイにヤンキーズが3連敗した。お金があるチームが陥るワナがここにある。
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
August 6, 1945. A 29 year old engineer is walking to work in Hiroshima on the last day of a three month business trip.
He's packed. He's going home to his wife and baby son tomorrow.
He looks up and sees a bomber high overhead. Something small falls from it.
Then the sky turns white.
His name was Tsutomu Yamaguchi. He designed oil tankers for Mitsubishi, and he'd been sent to Hiroshima to work at the company's shipyard. He was about two miles from where the bomb exploded.
The blast threw him off his feet. It burst his eardrums. It burned the left side of his upper body, his face and arms. For a while he couldn't see.
He spent the night in an air raid shelter in a city that no longer existed.
The next morning, badly burned, he found two of his coworkers who had also survived. Together they made their way through the ruins to a train station and got on one of the few trains still running.
They were going home.
Home was Nagasaki.
He got back on August 8, covered in bandages. His family barely recognized him. Doctors treated his burns. Most people would have stayed in bed.
On August 9, Yamaguchi reported to work.
He was sitting in the Mitsubishi office in Nagasaki, telling his boss what had happened in Hiroshima. How one bomb had wiped out an entire city. According to Yamaguchi, his boss told him that was impossible. That he must be out of his mind.
And at that moment, through the window, the room filled with the same white light.
The second atomic bomb had just exploded over Nagasaki. Once again, Yamaguchi was about two miles away.
The blast tore the bandages off his burns. The office was wrecked. And somehow, again, he lived.
He rushed home terrified of what he'd find. His house was destroyed. But his wife and son had survived too. They had gone out looking for burn ointment for him and were sheltering in a tunnel when the bomb hit.
Treating his injuries from the first bomb may have saved them from the second.
He was sick for a long time. His hair fell out. He had fevers and infections. But he recovered. He went back to work, raised a family, and lived a normal life for decades. He rarely talked about it publicly.
Hundreds of people are believed to have lived through both bombings. But in 2009, the Japanese government officially recognized Yamaguchi as a survivor of both, the only person ever formally given that status.
Late in life he finally started speaking out against nuclear weapons. He even addressed the United Nations.
He died in 2010 at the age of 93.
He was hit by the only two atomic bombs ever used in war. And he outlived the century they were dropped in.
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
Amazing true story about Nikola Tesla:
In 1884, a penniless twenty-eight-year-old Serbian immigrant walked off a steamship at Castle Garden, New York, with four cents in his pocket, a book of his own poetry, and a single letter of recommendation addressed to Thomas Edison.
His name was Nikola Tesla.
History textbooks reduce his life to a cartoon feud over light bulbs and alternating current, but they leave out the reality of how an uncompromising, fiercely disciplined mind conquered an empire of entrenched industrial cartels, and the lesson in sovereignty his life left behind.
Tesla did not arrive demanding handouts or grievance accommodations. When Thomas Edison reneged on a promised $50,000 bonus for redesigning direct-current dynamos—laughing that the immigrant "did not understand American humor"—Tesla did not file an administrative complaint or retreat into bitterness. He walked out the front door. For an entire brutal winter, the greatest engineering mind in human history dug ditches in Manhattan for two dollars a day just to pay for bread. He understood that hard physical labor stripped of dignity was the forge of character, not a reason to surrender self-worth.
His mind operated on absolute cognitive discipline. Tesla did not rely on physical blueprints or trial-and-error models. Because of severe eidetic memory and rigorous internal training, he constructed, tested, and ran entire machines inside his head for months before drawing a single line on paper. He could measure wear on imaginary gears purely through mental calculation.
When industrialist George Westinghouse recognized Tesla's polyphase alternating-current system and backed it, the entrenched establishment panicked. General Electric and J.P. Morgan mounted a vicious corporate smear campaign, electrocuting live animals to terrify the public into clinging to Edison's clumsy, central-monopoly direct current. Tesla destroyed their cartel not through political lobbying, but through undeniable technological superiority at the 1893 Chicago World’s Fair and the massive electrification of Niagara Falls.
Then came the moment that separated Tesla from every rent-seeking financier of the Gilded Age.
To stave off a Wall Street takeover and bankruptcy orchestrated by predatory financiers, George Westinghouse approached Tesla in private. Their contract entitled Tesla to a royalty of $2.50 per horsepower of AC electricity generated. Had Tesla enforced that legal contract, he would have become the first multi-billionaire on Earth, richer than Rockefeller and Vanderbilt combined.
Westinghouse laid the balance sheets bare: paying the royalties would crush the company, leaving AC power to be confiscated by Wall Street syndicates who would throttle its deployment.
Tesla looked at the industrialist who had risked his own fortune to back American manufacturing. He did not call a team of corporate lawyers to liquidate his partner’s assets. Tesla tore the royalty contract in half with his bare hands.
"My work is not for the present," Tesla told him. "It is for the future." He voluntarily walked away from generational billions to protect the independent production capability of American industry.
In his Manhattan laboratory, Tesla proceeded to invent the modern world. Long before the corporate state weaponized bureaucracy to stifle innovation, Tesla patented radio transmission (a patent the Supreme Court had to strip from Guglielmo Marconi and restore to Tesla), built the first radio-controlled naval drone in 1898, invented neon lighting, and laid down the foundational architecture of radar, robotics, and wireless communications.
He maintained absolute sovereignty over his instincts. He practiced celibacy his entire life, believing that creative and spiritual energy could not be squandered on fleeting physical appetites. He slept barely two hours a night, maintained an impeccable physical standard, and viewed his body as a machine consecrated to divine order and natural law. When J.P. Morgan later pulled funding on Tesla’s Wardenclyffe Tower—realizing that wireless power transmission could not be metered, taxed, and privatized into an administrative tollbooth—Tesla refused to bend his principles to appease financial oligarchs.
When Tesla died inside room 3327 of the New Yorker Hotel in 1943, federal agents from the Alien Property Custodian office rushed into his quarters within hours, seizing trunks of his notes, designs for directed-energy weapons, and frequency dynamics before burying them in classified archives.
The enduring value of Nikola Tesla’s life is clear: real power is never granted by institutions, boardrooms, or monopolies. Real power is forged through voluntary hardship, uncompromising standards, and a mind that builds rather than parasitizes. True sovereignty belongs to the producer who refuses to sell his soul to the cartel.
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
In 2008, Malcolm Gladwell explained why some people succeed and some don't in a single 1-hour talk.
This will permanently change the way you think about talent, effort, and success.
Bookmark & watch today, no matter what.
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
This is an important morning, and an important day.
I'd like to take a moment to thank Pat Murphy and the Milwaukee Brewers for SAVING Major League Baseball.
Since Billy Beane and Moneyball, Analytics Nerds have tried to aggressively take over our game. They never played baseball, and they told us it's okay to strike out, just walk and hit home runs. "We don't care about base hits," they say.
Well... the Brewers just SWEPT the Los Angeles Dodgers, who have a trillion dollar payroll if they didn't do all this Ohtani referral nonsense.
And what do we need to know about these Brewers?
- They were FIRST in MLB in batting average - you need hits to win!!!
- They were 28th in Home Runs!!! One of the worst Home Run hitting teams in all of baseball
I'd also like to thank the Tampa Bay Rays, who are currently battling in the ALCS.
- Rays batters struck out the LEAST of any team this season.
Baseball hasn't changed. If you want to play the right way, you need to have scrappy at bats, you need to have heart and grit, you need to PUT THE BALL IN PLAY (no strikeouts!) and get base hits.
Now watch how the Analytics Nerds will change course.
Last year, nobody was too interested in Luis Arraez (who gets hits).
Watch him get more money this offseason.
All of the trends will change. The Nerds are just learning about baseball, today.
“They may have a bunch of Hall of Famers, but we have a bunch of gamers. And the gamers won this week.”
@Brewers manager Pat Murphy after his team swept the Dodgers
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
This is what “feel” is. From a man who spent his entire adult life passionately learning by successes and failures. Seeing things most people don’t see. Learning the nuances of the game. This is what analytics will never capture. Analytics are void of this xitter.cf/todd_rosiak/status/211…
In 2019 a mathematician from MIT named James Howe spent 7 months building a blackjack betting strategy with a proven mathematical edge. Win rate 58%. Positive expected value on every single hand. He walked into a Las Vegas casino with $40,000 and grew it to $210,000 in 4 months.
In month five he increased his bet size from 1% to 5% of capital to accelerate profits. Working Note No. 10 contains the exact formula that predicted his outcome before he placed a single large bet. The probability of total ruin at those parameters was 26.3%. He did not know that number existed.
Here is why a mathematical edge does not save you without risk management -
The risk of ruin formula contains no expected return at all. P_ruin depends only on position size, win/loss ratio, and the number of consecutive losses needed to reach zero. James had a 58% win rate - better than most traders and gamblers in the world. At 1% position size his risk of ruin was 1.1%. When he moved to 5% it jumped to 26.3%. He changed zero entry rules. He changed one parameter - and multiplied his probability of losing everything by 24.
What happened next [Table 1, Equation 3] -
James hit a streak of 14 consecutive losses. Statistically rare but completely normal over enough hands. At 5% of $210,000 per bet he lost $73,500 in a single evening. Instead of reducing position size he continued - the standard psychological error the document calls compounding losses. By end of month his account read $0. A strategy with a 58% win rate produced complete bankruptcy in 31 days.
The formula that decided his fate [Kelly Criterion, Equation 4] -
f* = (bp - q) / b. At win rate 55% and reward-to-risk 1.0 the correct Kelly position size is 10% of capital. Half Kelly for safety - 5%. But James was already at 5% with worse parameters than the table assumes. The document states it directly: even a correct strategy collapses when variance is high and capital is limited. The edge over the casino was real. The math confirmed it. Risk management was absent - and that turned out to matter more than the edge itself.
"A positive expected value does not guarantee survival. Variance and limited capital can lead to ruin."
Working Note No. 10, May 2026
Probability, Risk and Capital Management Series
save this
Daenerys Targaryen: “Tell me, Jon. If I were not a queen, if I had no dragons, no army, no claim to the throne… would you still have come to me?”
Jon Snow: “I came to you before I knew who you were.”
Daenerys: “But now you know. You know what my father was. You know what my family has done. And you know what I am destined to become.”
Jon: “I know what you’ve suffered. I know what you’ve lost. And I know that somewhere beneath all that fire, there is a woman who wants to be loved.”
Daenerys: “And if that woman must burn the world to protect what she loves?”
Jon: “Then I would stand beside her and beg her to stop.”
Daenerys: “Even if stopping me meant betraying me?”
Jon: “I would rather have you hate me for telling you the truth than watch you become someone you can no longer recognize.”
Daenerys: “You speak as though love makes you brave.”
Jon Snow: “No. Love makes me afraid.”
Daenerys: “Of what?”
Jon: “Of the day I must choose between the woman I love and the world I swore to protect.”
Daenerys looks away, fighting back tears.
Daenerys: “And if that day comes, Jon Snow… will you choose the world?”
Jon: “I pray to every god I don’t believe in that you’ll never make me choose.”
Daenerys: “And if I do?”
Jon Snow: “Then, Your Grace… I hope the queen remembers the man who loved her before the world learned to fear her.”
Was Jon Snow the only person who could have saved Daenerys from becoming the very thing she swore to destroy; or was her fate sealed long before he ever met her?
Kevin Glaeske retweeted
BUNTING MANIPULATES PITCHER APPROACH AND SETS THE TABLE FOR FUTURE MOMENTS
With 2 outs and no body on in the 3rd inning, losing 4-0, @Brewers Manager Pat Murphy told #9 hitter David Hamilton to lay down a bunt in a seemingly unimportant at bat.
Why?
Because Murphy knew Hamilton was known for bunting and they could set the table for a future at bat and big moment later in the game where he’d get a pitch to hit.
And that’s exactly what happened.
Hamilton bunted.
Hamilton got out.
But in the 5th, in Hamilton’s next at bat, he got a pitch in the heart of the plate and singled scoring a run and bringing the Brewers within 1.
And in the 9th, Hamilton did it again, homering on a get me over slider and extending the Brewers lead to 6-4.
You bunt to create future moments, and the Brewers did just that.
#BuntLife






























