cool & unusual retweeted
talking about it is the methadone. you describe the project to a friend over coffee and feel the warm rush of having almost done it, the nodding, the encouragement, the sense of momentum, all of it real in the body and none of it on the page. the conversation scratches the exact itch the work was supposed to scratch, just enough, just often enough, that the pressure never builds to the point where you would have to actually make the thing to relieve it.
cool & unusual retweeted
Debussy: Music is the spaces between the notes
Miyazaki: A film of nonstop action—with no pauses to breathe—is just a commotion
Lao Tse: We shape clay into a pot, but it is the emptiness inside that is useful
Tiktok creators: Finally, we can remove all pauses from everything
cool & unusual retweeted
it’s common to refer to screens and the omnipresence of screens as “demonic”, something like hypnotism - for the internet, terms like “hellsite”, “doomscrolling”, all have this devilish lens to them.
regardless of what you think of his work, joseph smith is a uniquely american figure. i see utah hooked in on the earliest internet maps - arpanet and such things - this is presumably just a coincidence.
joseph smith famously had a seer stone which he allegedly used to bring forth the book of mormon. seer stones - i would file these under the folder of “scrying”, a practice where one looks into a physical item to see something beyond normal vision, has a long history. most people are familiar with crystal balls (which were actually used - polished selenite stones).
joseph smith’s personal stone has a long interesting history and chain of custody. allegedly after his death it was present at the consecration of an LDS temple - possibly in manti. i believe he had more than one, and at least one was named. an actual image of one of joseph smith’s stones was released by the LDS church relatively recently, you can see that below.
in some accounts of his translation of the book of mormon, he placed the stone into darkness, and it lit up (for him, personally). there is one tale where as a test, a friend switched his stone out for another, and upon placing this new false stone into darkness, smith remarks something like, “it’s dark as egypt in here”, meaning: it gives no light. then his friend is satisfied, and returns the real stone.
as a unique insight into the american spirit, in my opinion seer stones serve as a kind of extended metaphor in the mormon cosmology. some say joseph smith said every person had a seer stone waiting for them, but by grace these are not revealed to us yet, as we’re presently not in the state to receive them. i believe there is a tale about an angel or spirit looking into a white stone, or receiving their “true name” on a white stone (possibly misremembering this), and there is some account i picked up somewhere that in its perfected state, the earth would even resemble a large polished stone like this.
i am not saying all or many or any LDS people think this, or that i’m even recalling this accurately. i’m not an official source for such concepts, just a nerd who finds these things interesting. but i have often thought about this cosmos structure where everyone gets a seer stone, that has been waiting for them. once, i had a dream that i was in some pre-human state, and i was holding a stone, and it was kind of like a TV: i could look into and see life on earth, and was deciding what i thought about it - if it was good or evil, fair or unjust.
its not a huge jump to tie the concept of a luminous stone that shows you things to today’s screens. essentially, a warped version this odd ethereal vision has become true.
we all now possess the equivalent of a seer stone. show me a soldier dying. show me two people in love. what is the weather in berlin right now? i would like to hear a lecture by a harvard professor about the nicomachean ethics. show me myself twelve years ago today.
the screen-stones just do what we ask. yet, apparently we all view them as some form of evil. perhaps some harmonic of my recalled tale is true: that we shan’t have access to them, because of ourselves and our internal state.
don’t phones have stones in them? i’m honestly not sure. i never told one to tell me.
Alysa Liu recently went viral for her Teen Vogue rant on the state of the information environment and the population's cognitive resilience.
"We really are living in a cognitive wild west. Most people have near-zero memetic defenses or cognitive security suited for the online age". She adds, "any semblance of it is easily brute-forced by the onslaught of information & the situation is even worse when it comes to AI agent-orchestrated psyops."
cool & unusual retweeted
This dfw interview changed my life for that reason
Get talking with a group of writers and 9 times out of 10 they'll start in with the handwringing and the teeth gnashing about how the problem with their writing not selling is that they're just not good at marketing, nobody will give them a chance, distribution isn't good, people only want to buy erotica with vampires, etc. I don't think I've ever heard a writer take an honest assessment of themselves and say, "You know, my writing just isn't connecting with people, for whatever reason. I should get better at that." Because 99% of the time, that's the issue - not the fact the writer is some maligned genius that's being crushed and beaten down by the unfair world. The writers who recognize this fact tend to become more successful. The rest mostly just continue to wail and gnash and flail around about the "unfairness" of the world for decades while never improving.
cool & unusual retweeted
Replying to @nosilverv
substack.com/@andrsgmezemils…
Below are educated guesses for the percentage of people who are likely to reach each of the different epistemic ceilings.
Level 1: Pre-epistemic / Authority-anchored (≈25–30%)
Truth is external and personal: it lives in authority figures, traditions, or social consensus. Disagreement feels like insubordination or disrespect rather than information. People at this ceiling can be intelligent and competent, but they do not experience beliefs as revisable objects. Updating happens via deference, not reasoning. This level is stable and functional in hierarchical or tradition-heavy environments.
Level 2: Narrative-coherent / Identity-protective (≈30–35%)
Truth is whatever preserves a coherent self-story. Arguments are evaluated based on whether they affirm competence, virtue, or belonging. Counterevidence is tolerated only if it can be assimilated without threatening identity. This is where most everyday “reasonable adults” operate. Debate is possible, but only within emotionally safe bounds. Many people never feel pressure to go beyond this ceiling because it works well socially.
Level 3: Instrumental-rational / Outcome-oriented (≈15–20%)
Beliefs are tools. Truth is what works, predicts, or optimizes outcomes. People here can revise views pragmatically but often stop short of examining their own framing assumptions. They are good at solving problems but may avoid meta-questions that destabilize efficiency. This ceiling dominates business, engineering, and applied science. It is epistemically powerful but not self-transparent.
Level 4: Coherence-seeking / Model-based (≈8–12%)
Truth is structural consistency across domains. Beliefs are models that must cohere globally, not just locally. People here enjoy tracking assumptions, resolving contradictions, and updating publicly. Disagreement is informative rather than threatening. This level supports philosophy, theoretical science, and systems thinking. Social friction often increases here because many environments cannot metabolize this mode without defensiveness.
Level 5: Meta-epistemic / Self-modeling (≈1–3%)
The epistemic process itself becomes an object of awareness. People here track how beliefs form, how incentives distort reasoning, and how cognition interacts with emotion and status. They can hold multiple models simultaneously and switch frames deliberately. This level often appears in advanced researchers, exceptional judges, or mature contemplatives. It is rare not because it is inaccessible, but because it is costly and poorly rewarded.
Level 6: Integrated epistemic humility (≈0.1–0.5%)
Truth, uncertainty, and selfhood are fully decoupled. Being wrong carries no identity cost. These individuals can engage deeply or disengage cleanly, depending on context. They neither dominate nor self-erase. This ceiling often emerges late in life, after repeated epistemic injuries are metabolized rather than defended against. It is stable, light, and unusually nonreactive.
cool & unusual retweeted
aesthetics are pure information compression and thus they run the world on all levels
platonic solids/fractals/etc. are compressions and embodiments of complex mathematical relationships and constraints
career choices & cultural movements too are aesthetic-first as "tech bro" or "trad wife" are high information density symbols that neatly package the qualia of the life you want to live
cool & unusual retweeted
going to strengthen this statement and say that if you are smart and don't meditate you are limiting your intelligence and overall ability to see things clearly, in part because your mind is filled with garbage data and zombie background processes you've never even noticed
cool & unusual retweeted
For reference, here are the words most commonly known by men but not women (left) and vice versa (right).
cool & unusual retweeted
Replying to @vividvoid
Love this take.
Eros pursuing Thanatos & Thanatos ensuing Eros are classic tropes seen all over art. A tale as old as time.
The Denial of Death is the Denial of Love.
cool & unusual retweeted
Nutrient Levels in Retail Grocery Stores, or Why You Should Be Buying Your Groceries from Walmart
I've done some digging into nutrient levels in retail grocery stores (specifically where I should shop if I want nutritious food) and learned some insane things. Longest post I’ve done yet, so for readability this is also linked in my bio.
1) It's a well-documented phenomenon that nutrient levels in produce have been declining for decades. The average mineral content of calcium, magnesium, and iron in cabbage, lettuce, tomatoes, and spinach has dropped 80-90% between 1914 and 2018. (Image by Workinger et al., 2018)
There are several reasons for this, but most of them are due to modern agricultural practices. These reasons include: selective breeding, soil depletion, synthetic fertilizers that provide basic nutrients necessary for plant growth but not others that would make them nutrient-dense, higher CO2 levels in atmosphere diluting nutrient content in plants, over-irrigation washing away nutrients from soil, and long storage times.
2) If all you care about is nutrient content, SPEED is the only factor that matters. That means time between being picked and ending up in your mouth. Price doesn't matter, organic doesn't matter, marketing hoo-ha about how fancy the produce is doesn't matter. Literally just speed. Fresh spinach loses almost ALL of its vitamin C within 7 days of harvest when stored at 68°F (20°C). When stored at 39°F (4°C) which is about fridge temp, it loses 75%. The apples you buy at the grocery store can be up to a *year* old since they've been harvested, especially if you are not buying them in season.
Taste, texture, and smell are not good indicators of nutrient content, because you can't tell how long it has been since it's been harvested. Modern shipping and storage methods can be deceptive, combined with practices like spraying strawberry fragrance on otherwise bland strawberries so you think you're buying the good stuff (yes some places actually do this).
In general, it can help to eat in season, but due to the globalized supply chain...it's always in season *somewhere*. But how long did it take to get to you? You don't know. Even if it's in season where you are, how do you know if that's not from *last* season? Again, you have no idea.
3) Think for a moment: what store do you think sells the most nutritious produce? Your local farmers’ market? Whole Foods? Trader Joe’s must be decent, right? Nope, it’s Walmart. Because of their scale and insanely efficient supply chain, they can get things from the farm (wherever it is in the world it's growing in season) to the store where you can buy it, really really fast. Oh, and for the lowest cost.
I wanted to believe every time I splurged on fancier produce, I was actually getting something better. But this is what the data comparing 18 major US retailers showed – Walmart consistently outperformed.
I learned this from talking to Brent Overcash, co-founder of a startup called TeakOrigin, which specialized in testing nutrient content in groceries from retail grocery stores. For years, every week, his team would walk into grocery stores, buy thousands of produce items the way normal consumers would, and bring them back to the lab to assess nutrient content. They’d go to Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, Costco, Wegmans, Sprouts, Waitrose, farmers’ markets, and many more retailers. The “winner” varied depending on the specific type of produce/brands/exactly what week it was, but Walmart tended to come out on top. The more important point is that price and taste and organic certifications had no impact on the actual nutrient density.
They raised ~$5M and did a decade of research with labs full of analytical chemists where they used a combination of molecular spectrometry, HPLC, GC/MS, TGA, and wet chemistry methods. With 800+ million data points, the USDA and FDA at one point told them they had the world’s largest dataset of dynamic nutrition data. They’re no longer around, but had branches in California, Boston, and the UK just a couple years ago.
It went out of business because no major grocery store wanted to partner with them, because the transparency would hold these retailers accountable for *so many things* the consumers aren't even currently aware of. Things like how Whole Foods centers their entire branding around fresher, higher quality produce that's better for you, but when he actually tested some expensive apples they were selling from a local orchard advertised with handwritten chalkboard signs, it had so little nutrient content it was barely detectable on their lab-grade machines. He called the orchard because he was curious, under the guise that he was interested in picking some apples for the season. They said, "Oh sure, you can do that, but our first harvest isn't for another 6 weeks." That means it had been a year since the apples he bought were actually picked. This is actually industry standard, made possible by storing them at low temperatures and spraying a gas called 1-MCP which blocks ethylene (a gas naturally produced by the apples that makes them ripen) by binding to the same receptors.
I asked him: Are farmers’ markets any better, since we're getting the produce directly from local farmers? And he said basically there's huge variance. If you walk into a booth and that vendor is selling over 5 types of produce, there's no way they all ripened at the same time. They may not even all be grown by them. Once, he actually saw a vendor at Boston farmers’ market selling carrots from Target! He could tell from the packaging because he used to work for them. Turns out when a produce delivery is refused by the grocery store, the truck owner is then responsible for getting rid of that produce, and they usually drive to a “food hub” where bulk produce is bought and sold just to recoup some of the costs. That is one possible source of the mysterious farmers’ market carrots they were pawning off as homegrown.
Now, I'm not saying you should *stop* shopping at non-Walmart places. There are a lot of factors other than nutrient density that influence a purchasing decision. The fancy, expensive produce might taste better, smell better, and be better for cooking. It may come from farms where there are better wages and working conditions. There might be fewer pesticides. But again, for nutrient content, speed is the only thing that matters.
I want to do something about this, but it’s an issue way bigger than I can tackle alone. From the way we do modern farming, to the complete lack of transparency on the retailer's end (and vested interests in keeping it that way), to the government's lack of interest in enforcing this transparency for the sake of consumers...the problem runs deep and I'm tired man. And so is Brent, who’s retired and doing woodworking in his studio these days, living the good life.
cool & unusual retweeted
If you want to dress well this fall, imagine yourself as Big Jim Collie, a Scottish crofter in the 1970s who lived alone in a bothy and rode a rickety old bicycle through the Lairig Ghru, the highest mountain pass in the highest mountain range in Britain.






















































