Yes, we feel that these comments are made in bad faith. And we need to know what the tatics they are using When some RadioaOnco are losing their argument to against FT, they often refuse to concede. Instead, they resort to distraction and try to exhaust the other side. One tactic is the Gish gallop, they are throwing out a large number of weak, tangential, or untenable arguments in a single round, so that the other side cannot possibly address them all. Another tatic is repeatedly raising an argument that has already been clearly explained, they donot seek clarification, but simply to wear down the person they are debating. And to @LondonProstate1 please do not follow that tempo. That tempo is designed to waste your time. What you should do is to continue accumulating evidence and improving the FT technical aspects. If FT truly opens the door to better options for patients, their post do not need to be defeated. They will eventually lose their footing on their own. @FocalSociety ,@RSanchez_Salas @MichaelGrand1