Kitna ganda attire h
#WATCH | Bhuj, Gujarat: Members of the Ahir community gathered in large numbers wearing vibrant traditional attire to celebrate the annual Garbi festival during Navratri. (15.10)
Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśī retweeted
Among the sons of Rāv Jaimal Rathore, the legendary defender of Cītoṛ: Viṭhaldās and Rāmdās died fighting the Mughals at Haldīghāṭī. Dvārkādās and Kesodās died fighting for the Mughals against Ahmadnagar. Surtān died in Bihar fighting under Rājā Mān Singh against the Afghans.
Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśī retweeted
All that irrelevant rant, and you still couldn’t answer a single question written in such simple English. That tells you a lot about the comprehension skills of these dolts.
The question was simple: you’re criticising a community for supposedly never producing anyone comparable to Prithviraj Chauhan. Fine. But when asked who in your own community was comparable to Prithviraj, you had no answer. Instead, you wrote an entire irrelevant thread without addressing the question.
If producing someone like Prithviraj is the criterion, then where do the Dikhits stand? Because I don’t see anyone comparable to Prithviraj in Dikhit history either.
So, improve your reading comprehension. Spamming irrelevant historical snippets won’t help you dodge a straightforward question
I wasn’t the one who started this comparison, I’m just playing along. So, in this entire thread, please point out where the answer to my simple question is
Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśī retweeted
The Rājpūt who captured Sultān Mahmūd Khiljī and took him prisoner for Mahārāṇa Sāngā was Nārāyaṇdās Hāḍā, who was so infamous for his opium addiction that most of the time he would pass out while performing day to day activities, until his wife had to beg him to stop.
Baap dada khud ko rajputon se nikla btatate mar gaye beta yaha steepe bkchodi kr raha h @RorRajanyagana
Karnal district Gazzeter page 119
Sapne suhane madarchod ror ke dekho
Yeh bsdke suar jaat wale ko sirf bkchodi krwa lo bc khud ki jhantu jati ke naam puri indian history main ek dhang ka paragraph nahi hoga per bkchodi ko dekho iski
What kind of superiority are you talking about? Your people were literally a peasant class and your entire community was enslaved by Rajputs for thousands of years.
You have neither a history nor any achievements of your own. Only Koula Pujan is recorded history of your race
Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśī retweeted
I am reminded of this whenever I see our noble King. This is apt for India today.
Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśī retweeted
These classifications exist in almost every community and are a result of material realities of that time. One clan/subclan may achieve primacy through expansion/prosperity and vice versa.
One should avoid fabricating theories out of thin air to whine about them on the internet.
इस किताब का स्रोत नामालूम है मगर इसमें दिखाया गया जम्मू-राजपूतों का उपवर्गीकरण (subcategorisation) एक ऐसे सामाजिक नासूर की तरफ़ इशारा करता है जिसने राजपूत कौम को बरसों तक दर्द दिया। ऐतिहासिक तौर पर राजपूतों का धार्मिक होना ही उनके विरुद्ध इस्तेमाल किया गया। मनुस्मृति के अनुसार क्षत्रियों को सिर्फ़ योद्धा होना था; इस लोहे के पिंजरे जैसी व्यवस्था से अगर कोई अलग होना चाहता, तो इस व्यवस्था के झंडाबरदार उसका "जनेऊ-संस्कार" बंदकर उसका सामाजिक मानभंग कर दिया करते जैसे आज हुक्का-पानी बंद करके किया जाता है। किसी क्षत्रिय ने अगर अपने पारिवारिक भरण-पोषण के लिए तलवार त्यागकर हल उठा लिया तो उसकी सामाजिक अवनति (घोषित) कर उसे निम्न कोटि का राजपूत बना दिया जाता। ऐसा करके राजपूतों में भी ऐसा वर्गभेद और फूट डाली गई जिसका असर आजतक समाज में दिखाई देता है। आम राजपूत के धर्मभीरू होने का फायदा जिन ताकतों ने उठाया, अफसोस कि राजपूत आज भी उन्हीं की खींची लीक पर ही आँख मूंदे चल रहे हैं और आपसी भेद में फँसकर अपने हित बिगाड़ रहे हैं जबकि समाज और राजनीति में दलित-पिछड़े-आदिवासी-अल्पसंख्यक जैसे वर्ग एक होकर अपना शक्ति प्रदर्शन कर रहे हैं। शायद अपनी इसी कमज़ोरी के चलते ही राजपूत समाज "राजपूत कभी एक नहीं होते" जैसी थोपी गई धारणाएँ तोड़ नहीं पाता।

























