Stuart Lock retweeted
England is forgetting that education policy should be based on evidence and informed by experience - my first Substack piece
amvspielman.substack.com/p/g…
Stuart Lock retweeted
Shot / Chaser
This stuff isn't about "children talking in lessons". It's about whether or not politicians understand what improves outcomes for students. Pushing schools to groovy but nebulous ideas leads to worse results.
@LucyMPowell
h/t @StuartLock @Trivium21c
Stuart Lock retweeted
'Oracy' is principally associated with a school with negative Progress 8 and a programme that didn't show positive impact. It's a failed idea with a name that won't resonate with the public (cf. many don't know what *numeracy* is!)
Who is this meant to win over other than Hyman?!
Replying to @RealGeoffBarton @EducEndowFoundn
This is why definition are important.
I wouldn’t associate oral language interventions as meaning ‘oracy’
And given the disparity of the results from the screenshot above, to the one below, it’s clear that many things could be done in the name of ‘oracy’ have the desired impact
Stuart Lock retweeted
The Welsh National Curriculum guidance for English in 2008.
Anything stand out?
Stuart Lock retweeted
What a rallying cry! Maybe we're in for a period where it's "truth forever on the scaffold, wrong forever on the throne" - but reality wins in the end.
There's been a lot of talk in the last few weeks in edu circles about whether the trad education movement has failed, what it needs to do next, etc.
This article is just the latest in a succession of examples that shows how us edu-trads have not been nearly as successful as we hoped in altering elite consensus on education.
We have obviously seen with all the Labour party policies that we completely failed to convince Labour.
But actually, it's not like we've really convinced the Conservatives either. This is Dan Hannan, major figure in Brexit, major figure in Conservative politics, presumably has some idea of who Michael Gove is - and here he is in the Telegraph confidently asserting that we no longer need to know things because we can look things up.
(The ironies in this piece abound, by the way. He argues for lessons in spotting bad bogus arguments at the same time as building an article around the argument that memory doesn't matter any more. He argues that "identifying improbable claims" is a generic skill that can be taught in the abstract, at the same time as claiming that handwriting and geography are obsolete. He says that you can always just look up what you need, whilst signally failing to look up any of the evidence on the role of long-term memory...I could go on.)
I wrote a few weeks ago that there was some evidence journalists at the Financial Times were waking up to all the evidence on cognitive science, its implications for schools, the international test evidence.
But the elite understanding of this is a very thin layer, absolutely skin deep.
The mass of second-hand dealers in ideas are still distilling their frenzy from Romantic pedagogy.
Depressing. I honestly don't know what else we can do.
We wrote the books. We had the debates. We built the schools. We aced the tests.
And then it turned out nobody cared.
Right now it is definitely a bleak time to be a trad. It feels like we are on Athelney Marshes, beset by vandals without and dissension within.
BUT we have to keep the faith. Reality is an undefeated champion. Despair is a sin! What we do works!
It may well be that for now, the New World with all its power & might etc., is going to have to step in to save our bacon for a bit. Maybe the momentum is shifting to @ehanford and Sold a Story, @rastokke and Chalk & Talk, @jettybe3 , etc.
We have got to dig in. As Declan Rice said, it's not done!
Stuart Lock retweeted
There's been a lot of talk in the last few weeks in edu circles about whether the trad education movement has failed, what it needs to do next, etc.
This article is just the latest in a succession of examples that shows how us edu-trads have not been nearly as successful as we hoped in altering elite consensus on education.
We have obviously seen with all the Labour party policies that we completely failed to convince Labour.
But actually, it's not like we've really convinced the Conservatives either. This is Dan Hannan, major figure in Brexit, major figure in Conservative politics, presumably has some idea of who Michael Gove is - and here he is in the Telegraph confidently asserting that we no longer need to know things because we can look things up.
(The ironies in this piece abound, by the way. He argues for lessons in spotting bad bogus arguments at the same time as building an article around the argument that memory doesn't matter any more. He argues that "identifying improbable claims" is a generic skill that can be taught in the abstract, at the same time as claiming that handwriting and geography are obsolete. He says that you can always just look up what you need, whilst signally failing to look up any of the evidence on the role of long-term memory...I could go on.)
I wrote a few weeks ago that there was some evidence journalists at the Financial Times were waking up to all the evidence on cognitive science, its implications for schools, the international test evidence.
But the elite understanding of this is a very thin layer, absolutely skin deep.
The mass of second-hand dealers in ideas are still distilling their frenzy from Romantic pedagogy.
Depressing. I honestly don't know what else we can do.
We wrote the books. We had the debates. We built the schools. We aced the tests.
And then it turned out nobody cared.
Right now it is definitely a bleak time to be a trad. It feels like we are on Athelney Marshes, beset by vandals without and dissension within.
BUT we have to keep the faith. Reality is an undefeated champion. Despair is a sin! What we do works!
It may well be that for now, the New World with all its power & might etc., is going to have to step in to save our bacon for a bit. Maybe the momentum is shifting to @ehanford and Sold a Story, @rastokke and Chalk & Talk, @jettybe3 , etc.
We have got to dig in. As Declan Rice said, it's not done!
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannanOct 17United Kingdom
United KingdomConnected via United Kingdom App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
The school curriculum has been painfully slow to adapt to the implications of AI. But @LucyMPowell is spot on about one thing: we need to teach kids to express themselves better. Paywall down.
telegraph.co.uk/gift/5ac93c4…
Stuart Lock retweeted
The Secretary of State can not mandate oracy any more than he or she can mandate formative assessment, or peer tutoring, or anything else in the EEF T&L toolkit. The SoS can use the levers at their disposal: Ofsted, KS2 tests, National Curriculum, and GCSE specs. 🧵
Stuart Lock retweeted
I don't know Mouhssin, but his frustration at the changes in the direction of education policy has been obvious for a while now.
The world-leading education system in England is now in crisis because the politicians have utterly lost the plot.
I have formally resigned from the City of London Academies Trust.
This has been a difficult and carefully considered decision, reflecting concerns about the Trust’s future direction and its alignment with the educational principles that have guided my career.
I remain firmly committed to a traditional ‘warm/strict’ approach to education, founded on high expectations, exemplary behaviour, academic rigour and personal responsibility. I believe these principles are essential to securing exceptional outcomes for all pupils, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Recent decisions have prompted me to reflect on the Trust’s future educational priorities and whether the approaches that have contributed to sustained school improvement will remain central to its strategy. These concerns are heightened by wider shifts in national education policy, which I fear may weaken established practices that have consistently raised standards and improved outcomes.
I want to be clear that my decision is not a reflection on the current Chief Executive, for whose leadership and contribution to the Trust I have respect.
Ultimately, my resignation reflects a difference in educational philosophy concerning the Trust’s future direction. Having consistently championed these principles throughout my career, I believe it is right to step aside when I can no longer be confident that they will remain at the heart of its approach.
Stuart Lock retweeted
Today our Chief Executive, @StuartLock, is speaking at the @CSTvoice Annual CST Conference, sharing his leadership insights and expertise as part of an inspiring panel discussion. A fantastic opportunity to contribute to the conversations shaping the future of education.
Stuart Lock retweeted
I want one school, just one, with:
High P8/A8
Above 45% fsm
A focus on oracy
There should be loads of case studies to learn from.
Stuart Lock retweeted
Oracy is the snake oil that refuses to die. It's everything I can't stand about the progressive view of education - trifling, evidence free, tried and proven to not work.
Stuart Lock retweeted
This is a superb appointment for our Trust. Welcome to the team, Simon.
We’re delighted to announce the appointment of Simon Knight to a senior leadership role at Advantage Schools, bringing valuable expertise in inclusion to strengthen our commitment to ensuring every pupil has the opportunity to thrive.
Read more: advantageschools.co.uk/about…
Stuart Lock retweeted
We’re delighted to announce the appointment of Simon Knight to a senior leadership role at Advantage Schools, bringing valuable expertise in inclusion to strengthen our commitment to ensuring every pupil has the opportunity to thrive.
Read more: advantageschools.co.uk/about…
Stuart Lock retweeted
I said this about a year ago and received a LOT of hate. Unfortunately, in many contexts, the default is to try and seek a label to explain typical behaviours. This doesn't help anyone, and results in those that need the most support losing out.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crkg…
Stuart Lock retweeted
What a mess.
DfE announces
NEU says "this is great, and it was all our idea"
Headteachers are like "um this doesn't add up"
A month later journalists blow it open
Not great
Stuart Lock retweeted
For a very long time, I was optimistic about the future of education in this country.
This time last year, @amymayforrester and I predicted that when the next round of PISA results came out, England would tick up. There had been 15 years of positive change in the sector, and we thought that would pay dividends.
That then came to fruition. England is doing well, especially compared to countries that are similar in many demographic and social respects, but have different education systems.
But now, I am worried. There are lots of things going on that I think are problematic. The current government and DfE seem hell-bent on reforming a sector that does not need reform, and introducing changes that will row back some of the gradual improvements we have seen. Ofsted seem stuck in a mire of unpopularity, and are unable to convince the profession or the public that they are a force for school improvement. Big, respected, organisations that hold government contracts and an important place in the sector do not seem to be delivering. None of these groups are bad actors, and I really do believe they all want what's best, but that isn't always enough.
Alongside that, we seem to now lack the public discourse infrastructure to adequately challenge these issues. The 2012-2019 years on Twitter were ones of fierce debate and criticality, and ideas could be well-tested before, during and after implementation.
That doesn't exist any more. The debate seems so much flatter. That's partly a numbers game: social media has become a less popular place. But also, politically and commercially, more and more "big voices" find it harder to make public statements and take strong positions on things. It's easier to get in line and bend with whatever winds happen to be blowing at the minute, and you often see people taking surprising and contradictory positions. Critically, I don't exempt myself from this, and know that there are things I would have said 5 years ago that I won't now.
For the first time in a while, I'm worried. I am certainly no longer optimistic.




























