This is a page dedicated to promoting the science of reading and our understanding of it.

Joined April 2021
Science of Read retweeted
I often see schools use data from an assessment that was not designed for that purpose - which gives erroneous decisions. Our new article discusses this @UFLiteracy @nasponline @CECMembership @reading_league @NCTM @ASCD @mtssassociation @ResearchGate: researchgate.net/publication…
5
21
2
70
6,625
Science of Read retweeted
Hey, school psychologists - interested in an association dedicated to MTSS and data-based decision-making? Check out @mtssassociation (it is free). @nasponline @apadivision16 @SASP_D16_APA @MTSScenter @MTSSInnovations @PodcastPsyched
1
2
19
1,358
Science of Read retweeted
Notoriously, @burnsmk1 has said the Fountas and Pinnell assessment is no better than flipping a coin, based on his studies. Here's a classroom-specific case In point.
Make it Make sense🤔 Why are we still insisting on wasting time on assessments that clearly DO NOT reflect student's ability. My district still tests all students on their GL level. This is my class. @karenvaites @sstollar6 @SoRclassroom @HKorbey @CurriculumIP
3
7
28
2,805
Science of Read retweeted
New study that found that syntax (sentence repetition) uniquely predicted reading proficiency. @ILAToday @reading_league @NCILiteracy @ReadingForum_Ed @UFLiteracy @UF_COE @MountStJosephU @SpedMizzou @USouthFlorida @acadience rdcu.be/fooXk
3
21
59
3,992
We’ve been thinking a lot about phonemic awareness this month, and this is one episode we keep coming back to. Our conversation with Matt Burns helps make sense of what research actually says and why it matters for instruction. 🎧 Listen now: ow.ly/kuzl50YHrqa
1
6
11
1,083
Save 15% on your membership with code SPRING15 Join the International Dyslexia Association and gain access to: • Classroom-ready resources & professional development • Expert-led webinars, research, and CEUs • A supportive community that understands your work
3
3
1
7
490
Science of Read retweeted
The Mississippi Dept of Ed's Literacy Division: Top Ten Things that Every Literacy Leader (Administrator) Needs to Know: #10 Effective Feedback tinyurl.com/MDEadmin10
13
47
3,410
Morphemes are the smallest units of meaning in words, and learning morphemes can help students break down the meaning of unfamiliar words! Join us on April 8 to learn three morphology instructional strategies that secondary teachers can use across subject areas: irrc.education.uiowa.edu/pro…
5
6
514
Science of Read retweeted
Looking for quality yet entertaining literacy PD? Check out @literacypodcast. Here are top 5 for 2025 - honored to be included. @UFLiteracy @ILAToday @DyslexiaIDA @CECMembership @leadforliteracy @NCILiteracy @TheNCII @nasponline @UF_COE @reading_league @ScienceofRead – at Gainesville, FL
1
13
1
34
2,095
Science of Read retweeted
Great news, @UF_COE Spec Ed is searching for a new colleague with an open rank search!!! Come join the collaborative, collegial, and creative team. @CECMembership @AACTE @AERA_EdResearch @SSSReading @ScienceofRead @black_literacy @NCILiteracy @DyslexiaIDA higheredjobs.com/details.cfm… – at Gainesville, FL
7
14
1,124
Science of Read retweeted
If you missed the @EdWeekTeacher webinar on screening for #dyslexia, sponsored by @RenLearnUS, then you can still access the video at event.on24.com/wcc/r/5111580… @DyslexiaIDA @reading_league @LDTonline @ScienceofRead @NCILiteracy @nasponline @CECMembership @DyslexiaFound
1
9
27
1,533
🎉 It’s HERE! Registration for #TRLConf2026 is NOW OPEN! 📅 Sept 30–Oct 2, 2026 | Chicago Join educators, researchers & literacy leaders for three days of evidence-aligned learning, inspiration & connection. Secure your spot early & save your seat: bit.ly/4lUzmFC
5
11
1,155
Science of Read retweeted
Orthographic mapping is essential to sight word development. Orthographic mapping is not something we can teach. It is a brain process. What we can do is to teach in a way that facilitates it. The research shows with certainty that proficient readers do not learn words as a whole. To read words as if by “sight”, all readers must orthographically map those words. Consequently, the most effective reading instruction for novices is that which facilitates this process. Understanding this is essential for teachers of novice readers effectively; without it, we risk relying on practices and strategies that are not effective for most students. Reading is not primarily about recognizing the overall shape or pattern of a word. This is particularly dangerous for novice readers, who are the most vulnerable. Decades of research have already established that proficient readers do not become proficient by looking at the shape of words or memorizing them. Our visual memory has a limited capacity. To my knowledge, there is no research supporting the idea that spelling is a visual task where students simply “see” words in their rather than sound them out when reading or spelling. On the contrary, skilled spellers rely heavily on phoneme–grapheme knowledge, semantics as well as morphology, etymology, and statistical knowledge of spelling patterns.
1
7
56
2,816
Science of Read retweeted
Pro tip: Keep it simple. Keep it consistent. Keep it clear.
Guess what shiny, flashy, novel phonics activity we did today? We didn’t. We made words w magnetic letters & cookie sheets just as we will do 2x/week all year long. Keep routines & materials the same & focus on learning, even if it’s not as exciting to post on social media.
2
8
90
7,006
Science of Read retweeted
Return Road Trip! 🚗 I’m joined by @mmeburchell to discuss language learners (including Multilingual Learners and French Immersion students) and literacy! Is structured literacy good for them? Should assessment be different? reading-roadtrip.castos.com/…
3
5
566
Science of Read retweeted
There's a video of the @PlanetWordDC "Eyes on Reading" event with neuroscientist Reid Lyon and teacher Margaret Goldberg - and you can watch it now. youtube.com/watch?v=Cp1bvF8B…
1
14
47
6,546
Science of Read retweeted
They pull no punches in the Science of Reading Facebook group.
6
7
2
71
25,421