On the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, it’s crucial to recognize the various ways women experience violence on Wikipedia. Let's start with some examples: Zoe Quinn, a game developer targeted during the GamerGate controversy, had her Wikipedia page repeatedly edited to include false and defamatory information as part of a broader online harassment campaign. Feminist critics like Anita Sarkeesian have faced death threats and targeted harassment. Their work is often attacked by trolls, who also spread false narratives to discredit them. Dana Parish shared that a fired government scientist stalked her and had her and her husband's longstanding Wikipedia pages vandalized and removed by paying off Wikipedia editors. Police and the FBI were unable to help due to alleged corruption within Wikipedia. It is also important to remember that violence isn’t always physical and can manifest in many ways, including symbolic extinction. An estimated 90% of contributors on @Wikipedia are men and only 17% of biographies are about women. This imbalance undermines the idea of the wisdom of the crowds and perpetuates systemic inequality. Wikipedia researcher @shlomitlir has described Wikipedia’s Vicious Circle, where anonymity, a negative reputation, and hostility foster toxic interactions, online harassment, and alienation. These conditions deter women from contributing, reinforcing male dominance and widening the platform’s gender gap. Her recommendations, including transitioning from anonymity to nonymity for accountability, integrating social media for connection, adopting inclusionist policies, and implementing anti-harassment mechanisms, remain unimplemented. Despite the need for reform, @Wikimedia has yet to make structural changes. Evidently, “Everyone can edit” does not include women.