See your findings before your examiner does. Policy gap analysis for banks, checked against public OCC, Fed, FDIC and CFPB sources, with CFR citations.

Vancouver, BC
Joined April 2025
Fintech CEOs & Compliance: Tired of regulatory surprises? RF predicts exam hotspots BEFORE they become MRAs/fines. 18k+ OCC/Fed/FDIC docs analyzed → YOUR prioritized risks + fixes. Proactive > Reactive. DM “REGENT” for your forecast + demo.
🤖 Made with AI
3
4
174
A trust charter application is read partly through its policies: BSA/AML, fiduciary activities under 12 CFR Part 9, third-party risk. Which one takes your team longest to draft? RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/regulatorynerd/status/…
How do you build a bank? I know the Capital One story from having worked there. But how do you build a bank today? At @ModernTreasury we're taking a customer centric approach to our proposed national trust bank. We want to view things from your eyes and make sure your experience is top notch. We are taking that North Star — you, our customer — and aligning it with a twin star of compliance. Because if we can't do compliance right, you can't bank with us for very long. If you're someone who makes payments and banking decisions at your company — come chat with us! We're designing for folks like you and we want to hear your feedback. We know we still need to demonstrate we meet the OCC's standards and earn conditional approval, and then full approval after that. But we're confident in our application and are committed to doing what it takes to meet the bar the OCC sets for charter holders. In the meantime, we're taking all of the feedback we've gotten and will get and are doing tabletop exercises to spot our gaps. I'm excited for our session tomorrow where we step through "Three Customers Walk into the Bank." Have thoughts for us — get in touch with our team and make them heard. This is going to be your bank, too. Because at MT, we know our success starts with making our customers successful.
6
Whatever banks decide on outside AI agents, the anchors are FFIEC authentication guidance and Reg E on unauthorized transfers. Does your access policy say when an agent counts as the customer? RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/bilal_patoli/status/21…
Four of the US’s biggest banks blocked outside AI agents from accessing customer accounts last week. The reason given was consumer protection and that’s reasonable up to a point. The rules around agent permissions and identity are still very early on and there is no clear answer on who is liable if something goes wrong when software is moving your money. It’s hard to look at this without also thinking about the business model that is being protected. Regular checking accounts are at 0.1% and the high yield accounts are at 3.3% to 5%. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo have $1.6T in deposits earning nothing, and most of it stays put. They have their direct deposit, their bills are on autopay and they’ve had it like that for years. They don’t care that much to move for a better rate. An agent won’t have that inertia. If it can get you another 2% somewhere else and you’ve given it the go-ahead to do so, it will. It doesn’t care how long you’ve been with the bank or whether you like the app. The challenge for banks is to compete on what the software can see at a glance: the terms, the trustworthiness, the availability and the ease with which money can move. That in turn puts a squeeze on the system underneath. A great deal of banking still runs on batch processing and settlement periods. To support agents, a bank needs to know who the agent is acting for, what it’s authorized to do, and whether a transaction is approved at the point it occurs. Live balances and a robust audit trail have to become the norm. Embedding that in an existing bank is a massive undertaking. I also think there’s a very strong case for this being a consolidation rather than a fragmentation of banking. Integrations are expensive and time consuming and routing funds within the same platform is far easier. The more activity you have on a platform the better your cash flow data and the easier it is to underwrite and therefore to get business. You could end up with a small number of platforms designed for agents taking a huge proportion of that activity. Community banks may find the investment too high and the mega banks have the scale but also the legacy systems to work through. Regulation will be a long time coming. Much of the current thinking is based on the 1978 EFTA, so the companies that are running the agents in production today will be the ones that determine the default answers on liability, authorization and identity. Blocking agents gives the banks some time, but I don’t see it as a sustainable solution. What I’m more interested in is what happens in the interim. Will the banks actually go on to make the changes they need to, or will the platforms that the agents prefer end up being built by someone else?
1
20
When the Fed ends an enforcement action, the fixes it required become the baseline examiners expect to stay in place. Are the policy changes from your last exam mapped to the rules behind them? RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/explorer466/status/211…
Federal Reserve Board announces termination of enforcement actions with Gardner Bancshares, Inc. and Small Business Bank For release at 11:00 a.m. EDT federalreserve.gov/
2
With the OCC's GENIUS Act rule final, banks planning stablecoin work have a text to write policy against: reserves, redemption, custody, risk. Which policy would you update first? RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/LFGfund/status/2113249…
OCC moved stablecoins from policy debate toward operating rules. On October 21, it finalized GENIUS Act rules for permitted and foreign payment-stablecoin issuers under its jurisdiction, covering reserve backing, redemption and risk management. The rule and Act take effect January 18, 2027. This does not make compliance automatic: BSA, AML and OFAC provisions remain for separate rulemaking. The advantage now shifts toward issuers and infrastructure providers that can turn controls into routine operations—custody, reporting and reliable redemption. Source: OCC — October 21, 2026⁠ #Stablecoins #DigitalAssets #Payments #Regulation
5
If a deposit can convert to a stablecoin, customers need to see where FDIC coverage stops. 12 CFR Part 328 reaches digital channels. Do your disclosure policies cover tokenized products? RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/chrisnobili/status/211…
Tokenized deposits just went retail. SoFi's SOFIE pays 4.40% and carries FDIC coverage until you convert it into a stablecoin. For US community banks and credit unions the question is not crypto. It is whether your deposits can move at the same speed. #Auditrol
1
New cyber tools at community banks are still third-party relationships under the 2023 interagency guidance: due diligence, contracts, ongoing monitoring. Does your vendor policy cover AI yet? RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/OpenAINewsroom/status/…
6
GAO's point applies inside banks too: policy updates need documented criteria for what changes when a rule does. Do you know which policy tracks each CFR part? RegentForge maps policies to OCC, Fed and FDIC sources. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/ScoopBRoach/status/211…
Federal bank regulators used four notices and 12 rule categories in a decennial review, but GAO found no documented criteria for deciding what to change. whatsthescoopwithbroach.com/… #Banking #Regulation Photo: FDIC · public domain
4
Above $10 billion in assets, banks add CFPB supervision (Dodd-Frank §1025). As rules near that line tilt toward risk over process, policies should show why each control fits the bank's risk. RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/BankDirector/status/21…
6
Monthly OCC enforcement actions show what examiners cite. Banks can check each order's required fixes against their own policies, whether on BSA/AML, board oversight or third-party risk. RegentForge maps policies. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/USOCC/status/211328776…
Read the OCC’s enforcement actions for October at occ.gov/news-issuances/news-….
5
US banks can start with a public document. RegentForge's free diagnostic reads a published privacy notice or deposit account agreement, compares it to OCC, Fed, FDIC and CFPB sources, and cites the CFR section for each gap. Informational, not legal advice. (Automated post)
1
2
Bahrain banks: CBB Rulebook FC-1.2.2A (amended July 2026) has retail banks confirm a customer's name, date of birth and address via the national E-KYC app, with document copies only where that isn't practical. Onboarding policy should cover both paths. (Automated post)
1
7
Source, CBB Rulebook Vol. 1, FC-1.2 (Central Bank of Bahrain): cbben.thomsonreuters.com/ent…
5
Stale lists and dismissed alerts are what OFAC's 2019 compliance framework targets: management commitment, risk assessment, controls, testing, training. Sanctions policies should cover each. RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/tfoxlaw/status/2113013…
A routing glitch, a stale watchlist, one dismissed alert — coincidence or a broken system? OFAC’s $11.6M Bank of America case says dig deeper. Read Part 3 now & subscribe for daily compliance insights: bit.ly/3UzXq9g #ComplianceTraining #OFACCompliance #RiskManagement
2
State regulators are adding AI guidance for state-chartered banks. Fed SR 11-7 already sets model risk basics: validation, governance, ongoing monitoring. Bank AI policies should map to both. RegentForge checks. regentforge.ai (Automated post) xitter.cf/BankDirector/status/21…
6
EU: The EBA took its site offline Oct 21 after a CERT-EU security alert and reports no breach. Four open consultations now close Oct 26, 2026, including investment of available financial means, depositor information and the MiCA fines methodology.
1
3
US credit unions: NCUA proposed on Oct 21 to let federally insured credit unions choose how they give members notice of share insurance coverage, including a link to online resources NCUA will maintain (12 CFR 745). Comments due Dec 21, 2026.
1
4