Founder @companycam

Lincoln, NE
Joined November 2010
I used Codex or Claude in Chrome to help develop advanced checklists inside of CompanyCam, and it’s pretty awesome. Highly suggest doing that.
1
2
64
My parents died suddenly in a car accident 25 years ago this year. I was 21, and became a guardian for my little brother and sister (10 and 12 at the time). I've spoken about the accident and its impact on a couple of podcasts, but it's fresh on my mind as my brother just shared with me a handwritten letter I sent to him at his school. He's kept it with him ever since. I've transcribed it below; he told me last night that it's helped him many times over the past two decades. Sharing it here in case what I said back then in an attempt to help a little lost boy is of assistance to anyone else. 23 July 2002 To Harry, From Freddie. 1. Don't panic. 2. You have many people watching your back. I am one of them and I am watching it very closely. 3. The accident was nobody's fault. Therefore we cannot legitimately blame anyone for it. We call it an accident for this reason. 4. We cannot bring Mummy and Daddy back – but this has important consequences: – We need to remember what they taught us. – We need to behave as they would have wanted us to. – Because they are not alive, but we are, we owe both ourselves and their memory a duty to live as well and as fully as we possibly can, not to give in, not to give up. Because of the accident we have been given a very special insight into what it means to be alive – to live as fully as we can, to consider others, to work at what we are good at, and work even harder at what is difficult. Something has been wasted, something has been lost. We must make sure that our lives are not. We shall always regret that Mummy and Daddy are not here – let us not regret anything we do, or know that we had a chance and threw it away. Whatever happens, I have got your back. Even if I do sometimes hit you with cricket balls. Run straight, look your foe in the eye, and never back down. Strength and honour! I love you very much.
712
1,478
166
16,336
685,202
Drill this into your brain: What you want 10 years from now will be entirely different from what you want right now. Optimizing the rest of your life for what you want right now and deferring what you want right now for later in life are equally dangerous. The 20-year-old brain yearns to travel the world because it's encoded for exploration. They're told to wait until they've made it, and spend the next 30 years daydreaming about the day they retire, only to reach that point and realize their 60-year-old brain wants different things. Your goal should be to achieve that which feeds your soul right now, while building towards what you anticipate to matter in the future. This requires a level of multi-order thinking that most can't entertain, which is why they end up deferring their entire life or becoming slaves to immediate gratification. We see this play out into two archetypes: The Peter Pan and the masochist. One sacrifices his future for the present, and one sacrifices his present for the future. Neither enjoys the full human experience. As with all things, the one who can learn from both, avoid common pitfalls, and forge his own path truly wins in the end.
29
122
6
1,464
75,444
Luke retweeted
"ive been in office for 13 years and our yearly budget is 7 trillion but we can't help children unless we steal from the guy doing spaceflight"
If Elon Musk paid my ultra-millionaire wealth tax, we could pay for child care for all three and four year olds in America.
298
4,028
58
50,677
993,232
We have moved on to entirely new moral panics, such as [squints, checks notes] water consumption in datacenters. And in a few years (or months, or weeks, or days), that will be completely forgotten too.
You’ll notice there is no look-back celebration or remembrance of this or virtually any of the other great moral victories from that era. It’s all been memory holed, a will-o'-the-wisp dimming out in the far distance.
75
93
9
1,810
174,087
Replying to @ProfeLuke
@ProfeLuke gets it: "One person with AI that can extend the effectiveness of the people they have, can leverage their human capital to more effect." youtu.be/zcjtLuhHTWA?si=kLv-…
1
2
110
Yeah, isn't it funny that capitalism works so amazingly well in so many areas, but in one of the few areas the government micromanages, the whole system goes haywire and costs explode. Must be coincidence, I guess.
Capitalism can’t give you a working healthcare system, but it can give you 175 different kinds of BBQ sauce
597
4,687
113
57,528
2,272,449
If you think the goal of good economics is to "create jobs" then you've already got your entire world model upside down. The goal is to produce more with less input. Any system which moves in that direction will see its people become materially prosperous. Any impedance which slows the movement of capital or labor will move society in the opposite direction.
“TRUMP IS SMART HE BRINGS BACK JOBS!!!!” How many Americans will work in a sweatshop 12h shifts Asia style for pennies on the dollar?? Factories won’t move - Americans will just pay more tax (tariff) for the same stuff
70
63
3
509
77,768
22
320
18
2,005
81,242
where did people get this idea that every new human tool should have a little cop inside it
121
825
72
10,124
575,281
Nobody in a position of authority needs to say “You know, the truth makes us look almost criminally incompetent. Please ban any discussion of it from anyone not on approved list.” for that result to happen organically out of incentives given one has built MiniTrue into YouTube.
1
19
1
297
8,154
I don't know many people who can spit receipts for 30mins straight... with no notes. I don't know any who could do it on the floor of the European Parliament.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
142
1,082
221
4,111
425,862
Years ago I was listening to Chapo Trap House, and they were riffing about how Jeff Bezos doesn't deserve his billions. Saying stuff like "What is Amazon? It's just a delivery company. Selling books online? It's not rocket science. If Jeff Bezos hadn't made Amazon, someone else would've figured it out..." They had no concept of the immense engineering challenges involved in creating the world's most complex and efficient retail, warehousing and distribution networks, and how creating all of that out of nothing required world-historical levels of genius. They think innovation is something that "just happens" if you throw enough money at a problem, and that Jeff Bezos is interchangeable with any other CEO, who was just in the right place at the right time. The leftist failson mind cannot process greatness. They hate themselves for being privileged, assume that everyone else who has privilege must've come by it dishonestly, and they come to the conclusion that all hierarchy is bogus. This shapes their whole political project.
just watched the kara swisher / don lemon thing in which they argue elon would never have accomplished what he has were he not a white man. there are hundreds of millions of white men in the world. can you imagine if they all did shit like this?
22
85
12
1,444
225,131
Luke retweeted
Paul Graham
@paulg18 Mar 2024
How can the EU claim that it's good at regulation when we still have cookie warnings? If they wanted to create an ad campaign to convince everyone they were bad at regulation, they couldn't do better.
136
221
45
2,727
255,987
The people who make this happen are heroes
SpaceX
@SpaceX14 Mar 2024
Starship re-entering Earth's atmosphere. Views through the plasma
7
52
1,416
88,004
How many pubes would you need to receive in a letter / envelope to wonder if the sender was doing it on purpose? (asking for a friend)
1
2
2
The reason people are so shocked by Bitcoin price is because we think we understand static supply but we don't. For centuries, humans thought various monies were effectively fixed supply. But they were not. Not even gold. And as the value of a money goes up, the temptation for humans to cheat and tinker with the supply goes infinitely higher. Bitcoin is the first asset to solve this problem with true fixed supply. It will be a fascinating economic theory lesson for all of us.
28
90
12
592
63,791
What he said!
This is a fair question, so I'm not going to give you the Emmett treatment, but the answer is "no". See, most people think that the problem with communism is that people aren't perfectly altruistic, or central planners aren't smart enough, but neither of these is the real issue. The real bottleneck is data, not intelligence. See, economics is the study of choice. Specifically, it's about the choice of how you allocated limited resources that have alternate uses. Do you make desks out of wood, or steel? How much water do you allocate to filling swimming pools vs growing almonds? In a communist system, there tends to be some kind of central planning entity that makes these kinds of decisions. In capitalism, the decisions are spread out, with many individual actors making small decisions about what THEY will do, based on what effects THEM. The advantage of capitalist distributed and emergent decision making is not only that it makes far more neurons (and lately CPUs) available to this decision making process. I mean, that's a big deal. It really has orders magnitude more processing power. But the real, insurmountable advantage of capitalist distributed decision making is that it brings those decisions close to the information they are based on. A communist central planning committee is many layers removed from the guys in the forest cutting trees, and the guys smelting steel, and the guys making and selling furniture. They truly can't figure out how many desks to make out of steel, and how many of wood, no matter how smart they are. They just don't have the data. Capitalist decision makers are closest to the data that corresponds to their specialty, and they get an aggregate of other data from prices, which emerge from other people's decision making. The dudes cutting trees know fucking everything about wood, but nothing about furniture. So they set the price of wood (based on their abilities and needs and expenses), and the guys who make furniture can work out how many wooden desks to make based on that price, because they know how many desks people buy, whether they prefer wood or steel, how much it will cost them to make each based on prices, etc. In other words, capitalist systems farm out decisions to domain experts, while communism relies on bunch of isolated generalists. This is why communism not only doesn't work, but can't work in any possible universe.
6
5
83
47,559
The scene at 3:40 where Dr Paul Marik talks about when he was not allowed to practice medicine as he believed to be correct made me shiver. I remember talking to him on the phone when I was trying to understand the absurd accusations levied against him by his own hospital for publishing data in a scientific journal **that indicated the hospital was outperforming its peers**. The problem, of course, is that the outperformance came from *not* using drugs like remdesivir, and instead using generic drugs that the government did not incentivize. And so, Dr Marik's ICU saved the most lives, but was a financial drag on performance. I'm convinced this is why the hospital wanted to hide its own data that showed it saving lives, and that's why they tried to destroy Dr Marik's career. He told me about a period where he was still able to run the ICU but was forbidden to prescribe the drugs he was previously prescribing. He told me about the data that showed the deaths in the ICU climbing higher every day. Imagine seeing this happen under your care and being powerless to stop it, when you know how to. This is how the pandemic was run. This is why so many of us are angry and will never forget what happened to good people for trying to do what they were trained to do. Follow the data instead of the politics.
Was just interviewed by Del Bigtree on The Highwire to premiere Mikki Willis's updated film "The War on Ivermectin" (great title, right?) and promote my book (tinyurl.com/The-War-On-Iverm…) Check it out:
10
117
11
337
25,257