Using 2D photos to create a 3D model which can settle the question Was he offside?

Joined August 2015
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @messifan21
I promise I cannot do better than the system they have in place.
61
I don't doubt it likely went in, just that it isn't terribly definitive. Chances are it was a goal, but surely difficult for AR to see live and not clear enough for VAR
2
203
I use multiple angles so I can get an intersection in 3D to determine the position. I wanted to use the behind-the-goal angle but unfortunately the distortion on that image is so severe it limits its usefulness in these scenarios.
2
1
213
Will try to get to it, need to cook dinner now though 😁
5
379
Will try to get to it soon. Need to cook dinner now 😁
1
63
The first @PhilaUnion goal against @ColumbusCrew back on May 10, from the free kick? I have it as 8 inches offside. Honestly, a _lot_ closer than I expected. Still feel like VAR could have intervened but this info makes it look less obvious than I originally thought.
2
41
3,277
The @ATLUTD goal against @AustinFC back from almost a month ago? Sorry for the delay, but it looks like it was onside. Only by 3" by the model, but no reason to think it wasn't onside from this
2
4
1
90
6,910
The offside in El Traffico? That took @LAGalaxy's Gabriel Pec's goal off the board? I have it as 9-10 inches offside. That's with a relatively conservative guess on position of the 2LD, so could be more.
2
3
1
64
7,613
That @NashvilleSC goal line situation? I have it as 3/8" inside the goal. Given the difficulties of the model and esp. goal-line situations, I can't be sure that it was or was not a goal.
8
7
2
74
10,107
Yeah, I'm on this one. Unfortunately it is going to take a bit of effort, goal line situations are the most difficult.
1
84
Replying to @andrew_wiebe
Did you mean to use the "Obi WINE" version?
1
2
191
OK, so that St. Louis goal against Columbus called back? I have it as 6 inches onside. I will say that it's harder than it looks b/c 2LD here has his foot off the ground so it isn't as easy as just following the lines in the grass.
1
8
1,811
Hey all, I know I've been absent, and I know that @andrew_wiebe keeps sub tweeting me from #InstantReplay, but I'm back. I am now also on Bluesky (@offsidemodeling.bsky.social) So what do you want me to look at? And apologies for disappearing like that.
7
1
21
1,312
Replying to @MLSRefStats
Just tell everyone it was wrong due to camera distortion and update the values, always works for me.
14
248
Replying to @DanielCluley
If I've learned anything in my soccer fandom it is this: Never listen to commentators for accurate interpretation of the laws, and never rely on the freeze frame they use when showing offside calls.
1
30
It is very difficult to evaluate because they don't show a second line parallel to the goal line (only show the midline). Still, the center circle lines up so nicely that I would be surprised if the error would end up with him onside.
1
1
298
Should I make an Offside Modeling/Soccer Photogrammetry Bluesky account?
54%Yes, but keep this one
24%Yes, move entirely
16%No
5%Cheese 🧀
91 votes • Final results
1
2
1,555
Trying to put me out of the job, are you? Oh wait, I don't get paid... Right
2
57
Replying to @andrew_wiebe
Most important thing here is the complete lack of a second line to give you a vanishing point for that offside line. I had to use subtle grass lines and the center circle lining up. Without that, really difficult to get your bearings.
3
453