Carmelite Monastery

Fr. Ripperger: Ecumenist And Deceiver Exposed - And Why He Was “Silenced” (New Video) youtube.com/watch?v=gjfrn1ww…

CMRI Supporter Blatantly Denies Defined Dogma In this clip a CMRI supporter blatantly denies the Catholic Church’s defined dogma on salvation. He explicitly states that they’re not saying that all Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus are damned and that “we don’t know” if such people are saved. Well, the Church has already settled this issue. It has dogmatically defined that all who die as Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus (i.e. as pagans) are lost (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”) and that the Catholic faith is required for salvation. People like him are simply not Catholic, even though they purport to be staunch traditionalists when they aren’t. This is also why such heretical groups (and the heretical rogue priests who lead them into heresy) have such an animosity toward true Catholics who actually believe in the Church’s teaching on salvation and baptism. “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”, 1441)

16th Century Theologian: Pope St. Siricius & St. Gregory Nazianzen Rejected “Baptism Of Desire” Fr. Juan de Maldonado was a Spanish Jesuit theologian who died in 1583.  He admitted that Pope St. Siricius and important Church father St. Gregory Nazianzen (who is named the Theologian) rejected “baptism of desire”.  The fact that they rejected “baptism of desire” is obvious to any honest person who reads what Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory actually wrote on the matter.  However, many John 3:5 mockers are so dishonest that they won’t even admit that Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory the Theologian denied “baptism of desire”.  Hence, a statement from a theologian who acknowledged this is noteworthy.  Note that Maldonado presumes that the aforementioned individuals believed that martyrdom could replace baptism, but there’s no proof for his assertion and his statement on this point can be disregarded.  The Church’s teaching demonstrates that all the martyrs in Heaven received the Sacrament of  Baptism (see Pope Benedict XII, Benedictus Deus) and that no one is saved without rebirth of water and the Spirit.  See our video: 2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity. Fr. Juan Maldonado, Opera varia theologica, Vol. 1, 1677 (De Baptismo, Q. 4), p. 59: “Among the ancients there were some who insisted on baptism itself so strictly that they thought everyone perished who died either unbaptized or not by a martyr’s death.  Of this opinion was the author of the book On Ecclesiastical Doctrines, chapter 74: ‘We do not believe that a catechumen has life, even if he died in good works.’  So also Pope [Siricius] in his letter to the bishop of Tarragona, and Gregory of Nazianzus in the oration on holy baptism [Oration 40].” Also, it wasn’t just Pope St. Siricius (in his decree to Himerius) and St. Gregory the Theologian who rejected “baptism of desire”.  The early Church itself did, as we showed in the aforementioned video by citing Pope St. Leo the Great, Pope St. Zosimus, and more.

Joe Heschmeyer (“Shameless Popery”) Confronted By Bro. Peter Dimond About Vatican II - New Video youtube.com/watch?v=PVeCJ9Q2…

You really have no idea what you are talking about. This video covers in detail the shocking things that John Paul II said about Assisi and the (false) religions that were represented there. By defending the abomination of Assisi, you implicate yourself in mortal sin and idolatry. John Paul II blasphemously taught that all the pagans and idol worshippers at Assisi actually worshipped God and that their prayer was necessary and inspired by the Holy Spirit. You are heretical and totally deceived. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

Are you actually calling him a saint? If so, that's a mortal sin and a denial of the Catholic faith. See our recent video on Assisi for many other shocking things Antipope John Paul II said about it and about the false religions represented there. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

“St. Paul The Apostle” – NYC “LGBT Catholic Church” Exposed (New Video) This is one of the worst Vatican II Sect churches in the country. youtube.com/watch?v=vVNOpizf…

He’s not the pope, but an apostate antipope, as our material explains.

Every pope in history recognized that the death penalty is acceptable for certain crimes. Leo XIV is not a pope but a notorious heretic and an antipope, as our material explains. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21090100…

Antipope John Paul II taught that Hindus worship God and that the Holy Spirit inspires people to worship as the Hindus. That's apostasy, of course. See this video: xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

Because the Catholic Church teaches that notorious heretics cannot be valid popes. The video above proves that he was without any doubt a notorious heretic. Many other facts prove it as well. The current situation in Rome was prophesied, as our material explains.

18th Century Dominican Cardinal (Vincenzo Gotti): Protestants Cannot Be Martyrs Cardinal Vincenzo Lodovico Gotti (1664–1742) was a Dominican theologian, prior, provincial, and inquisitor of Milan under Clement XI.  He wrote an apologetic work on the Church against the Swiss Calvinist Giacomo Picenino. Cardinal Vincenzo Lodovico Gotti, O.P., Vera ecclesia Christi signis, ac dogmatibus demonstrata, 1748, Chap. 3 (#6), pp. 78-81: “Protestants neither have martyrs nor can have them... I likewise most gladly yield to you your martyrs of France, who died not for Christ but for the faith of Calvin. Nor would I say more about them, except that you dare even to compare them with the ancient martyrs and to treat the cause of both as one and the same. Our ancient martyrs died for the unity of the Church; yours died for schism against that unity. What common cause, then, is there?... The Calvinists and the other sectarians did not suffer for justice, because they did not die in the faith. Nor in charity: if they had possessed it, they would not have torn apart the body of Christ, which is the Church. Therefore they are not martyrs.”

He's an antipope, and the current situation in Rome was prophesied. It proves that traditional Catholicism is true. See this video: xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/20438325… Protestantism is definitely false.

St. Robert Bellarmine On How All Catholics Support The Death Penalty St. Robert Bellarmine, De Laicis, Chap. 21: “John Hus (Article 14, read out in the Council of Constance, Session 13) asserted that it is not licit to hand over an incorrigible heretic to the secular power and permit him to be burned.  Luther likewise (Article 33) asserted the same. Nor is the error new, for even the Donatists taught the same, (men such) as Parmenianus, Petilianus, and Gaudentius – as Augustine testifies in Book I of Against the Writings of Petilianus (Ch. 10), in Book 2 of Against the Letters of Gaudentius (Chs. 17 & 26), and Epistle 50 to Bonafacius.  All Catholics teach the contrary… Therefore we will briefly show that incorrigible heretics, and especially relapsed ones, can and should be cast off by the Church and punished by the secular powers with temporal punishments, and even with death itself…” For more, see our article called: “St. Robert Bellarmine On The Death Penalty And Heretics”

You are actually implicated in the mortal sins committed there because you venerate as a saint the notorious apostate and idolater, Antipope John Paul II, who organized it. That's the spiritually deadly bad fruit of your false position on the Vatican II antipopes. John Paul II also blasphemously taught that all the (idolatrous) worship at Assisi was inspired by the Holy Spirit, as our recent video showed. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

Because Leo XIV is an apostate antipope and the Vatican II Sect is not the Catholic Church. See our most recent video on Assisi.

Almost no one realizes just how bad Assisi actually was. For what really happened, the shocking things that John Paul II said about it, and its true significance in the Great Apostasy, people need to see this video: xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

The Vatican II Sect is not the Catholic Church. See this video and our channel and website for a full explanation. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/20438325…

That's widespread in the Vatican II Counter Church, as our material explains. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/20952658…