In 2018, researchers scanned more than 2,000 square kilometres of northern Guatemala using lasers fired from aircraft. They were looking for traces of the ancient Maya beneath the forest. But the results revealed something staggering: more than 60,000 structures. Homes. Palaces. Roads. Fortifications. Vast areas of modified farmland. Familiar archaeological sites turned out to be parts of a much larger, interconnected landscape. The trees had hidden the scale of what was there.

Divers just found Aboriginal stone tools beside a drowned freshwater spring, in landscapes swallowed by the ocean at least 9,000 years ago. Some stone originated approximately 23 kilometres away, demonstrating movement of valued materials across what is now seabed. Researchers believe this is part of a much larger submerged cultural landscape whose true scale remains unknown

In 1890, workers digging in a Russian peat bog uncovered a wooden figure covered in strange faces and geometric markings. It became known as the Shigir Idol. But nobody realised just how old it was. More than a century later, scientific dating placed it over 12,000 years in the past. Thousands of years before the pyramids, someone had carved this extraordinary object using stone tools. We still don’t know exactly what its markings meant. But its survival raises a bigger question. Stone survives. Wood usually rots. How much of the prehistoric world looks simple to us because its most extraordinary creations have disappeared?

In 1542, Francisco de Orellana took a small Spanish party down an Amazon tributary looking for food. But the current was too strong to return. They ended up travelling all the way to the Atlantic. What they encountered was extraordinary. Their chronicler described huge settlements, roads leading inland, abundant food and riverbanks so densely populated that one settlement seemed to follow another for miles. This was a landscape full of people. But later explorers found a very different Amazon. The enormous populations described in the account were nowhere to be seen. It was just jungle. For centuries, scholars dismissed the story as exaggeration or fantasy. But European diseases and colonisation had devastated Indigenous communities. The later explorers were seeing the aftermath. Now archaeology is revealing vast ancient settlement networks beneath the rainforest. Orellana’s expedition had glimpsed a world that was about to disappear.

This fossil is casting serious doubt on the Out of Africa theory. It’s part of a skull discovered in a Greek cave in the 1970s. Researchers initially thought it belonged to a Neanderthal. But a later analysis reached a startling conclusion. It appeared to be Homo sapiens. And it was at least 210,000 years old. Our species, in Europe, more than 150,000 years before the major migration out of Africa traced in our DNA. So how does that make sense? Well, we already had evidence of earlier journeys. Human fossils in Israel showed our species had ventured beyond Africa long before that major migration. But Greece was much further away. And this skull suggested a much earlier arrival. There is, however, a possible explanation. Your DNA tells the story of people who passed their genes down to you. But it can’t reveal every population that ever existed. Some may have travelled far, survived for thousands of years, then disappeared without leaving descendants alive today. Fossils can reveal those missing people. And perhaps that’s who this skull belonged to. An early wave of humans who left Africa, reached Europe… And became a branch of our family with nobody left to remember them.

The world's oldest shipwreck has just been discovered off the coast of Turkey Archaeologists dated it to 4,400-4,700 years old, which is around the same time that the Great Pyramid was being built.

We’ve always assumed we were the first advanced civilisation on Earth. But proving that is harder than you might think. In 2018, two scientists, Gavin Schmidt and Adam Frank, published a paper called “The Silurian Hypothesis: Would it be possible to detect an industrial civilization in the geological record?” They were exploring how we might find intelligent life on other worlds. But that raised a disturbing question about our own. If an industrial civilisation existed here millions of years before us… would we even know? Their answer? We’d be very unlikely to find anything. Cities. Machines. The remains of their world. Over millions of years, erosion, burial and the recycling of Earth’s crust could erase those recognisable signs. What might survive is something much harder to interpret: Unusual chemicals in the rocks. A sudden shift in carbon. Traces of a planet being transformed. But natural catastrophes can leave similar fingerprints. Now they weren’t saying an earlier civilisation existed. They were asking whether we could recognise one if it had. Because before we search other planets for vanished civilisations… How certain are we that we’d spot one on our own?

Something weird is happening in Turkey. For decades, people have claimed this enormous boat-shaped formation near Mount Ararat could actually be the remains of Noah’s Ark. Most scientists dismissed it as a natural geological formation. But recently, researchers scanned beneath it. And they say they detected strange linear and angular features underground. Now, that does not mean they found a buried ship. Radar can pick up completely natural geological structures. But this is where it gets interesting. In 2026, an officially authorised research project involving Turkish academics and with the approval of the Turkish government began investigating the site. And they've now drilled into it. Physical samples have been taken from beneath the formation and sent for analysis. If they find ordinary rock and sediment, this could finally settle the mystery. But if they find ancient worked timber, artificial material, or evidence that those underground structures really are man-made... Then we have a much bigger question. Because even though that wouldn't prove this is Noah's Ark, it would mean something is buried underneath it. And that could change history The results should be published later this year - keep an eye out