💼 SaaS PM who likes movies 🍿 https://xitter.cf/t.co/QEjRZqDQoj 🎤 Opinions mine

Denver, CO
Joined March 2009
Closest thing to a definitive history of the first 23.21% of the 21st century
most of my writing just tries to understand the economy through cultural history—and vice-versa. but to understand this moment, i explored a different history this time: my own. a tale of two bank failures, and the most personal thing i've ever written: davidphelps.substack.com/p/b…
4
1,072
The two movies are about the exact same problem of a shattered social contract and the hell on earth aftermath
the concept of Christopher Nolan's nearly $2B grossing blockbuster about the most famous story ever told losing Best Picture to Nathan Fielder being a weird little freak
27
Sometimes, to create, one must first destroy
Why is the overall market so fixated on $CRWV's imminent demise? At the peak of the Dot Com bubble, $CSCO - the largest company in the world, and the $NVDA equivalent of the era - generated about 10% of its revenue from circular deals through vendor-financed startups. When those startups lost access to capital, $CSCO's revenue growth went from +66% to -30% within a few quarters, and the stock lost 80% of its value. The same story played out across the dot com supply chain, sending the Nasdaq down 80%. Today, $CRWV alone makes up roughly 8% of $NVDA GPU sales. Losing that demand is enough to nuke $NVDA's growth story all by itself. Oh, and $CRWV isn't an isolated example - every major neocloud is hemmoraghing cash and borrowing costs are going UP across the board. If you lose the neoclouds, you lose the incremental growth driver for marginal data center capacity, and the AI capex trade goes up in smoke. That's why we're seeing carnage across the entire AI supply chain, from $CAT and $GEV to $MU, $AVGO and more recently $NVDA. This is what the beginning of the end of a debt-fueled, circular-financed capex bubble looks like.
14
Guy whose boss prioritized healthcare over climate
EVERYONE SHOULD GO SEE DIGGER The election is important, but so is this
36
Without failure, you do not have markets
Wow, the potential $BMBL acquisition is for $1 BILLION. That's more than $6+ per share. (EDIT: after debt and dilution it's actually just a bit above $4.30 per share)
27
There is no single problem people whine about more while understanding less than inflation
Earning $100K in 2016 is inflated adjusted equivalent to earning roughly $140K in 2026 Within the span of a decade, we have seen 40% inflation. This is based on CPI numbers, which itself understates inflation across many key items that we buy everyday The reality is that the national debt levels have only left us with one choice. We must grow ourselves out of debt, which itself is inherently inflationary Unless you own assets, you will get left behind. There has never been a worse time to be a simple salary man with savings
1
45
We deserve everything we are getting
Sen. Chuck Grassley Files for 2028 Re-Election; Would Be 101 by End of Term
37
Tom Cruise wearing a flight suit during the scene where he has a break down over the purpose of his work as an actor … probably nothing
Snaps from the set of #DiggerMovie, straight from Tom Cruise. See it in cinemas now! 📸: Tom Cruise
17
265
22
6,723
126,888
Capitalism works if and only if all members see themselves as "pre-rich" or "feasibly-rich-if-they-wanted-it-badly-enough". Remove that and the system collapses.
421
1,121
143
9,592
386,116
We have never had an honest analysis of tradeoffs between the cheap goods of global competition/trade vs. the stable jobs and production control of mercantilist autarky. You cannot have low prices and protected jobs at the same time. Well, unless you innovate…LOL.
BREAKING: Inflation on many everyday items was entirely due to tariffs, NY Fed has said per CNBC
16
There’s a scene in The Unabomber where a character looks at a piece of paper, the camera then shows us the words, the character then says the words to himself.
Netflix are already making shows for "second screen" viewers. So plot lines have to be repeated and dopamine hits and action must occur every ten minutes. This is changing the way stories are written. Accommodating neurological damage & habit-forming addiction to smartphones.
1
31
‘DIGGER’ is actually set to lose over $250M for Warner Bros. (Via: @TheWrap)
12
286
9
3,187
32,738
Matthew Desmond concluded Evicted with a begrudging admission that private vouchers are the best option for homelessness a DECADE ago. Reading is hard.
The New York TImes: What’s one issue in politics that you’ve changed your mind about? Zohran Mamdani: The role of the private market in housing construction.
28
Digger’s point that we are deluded hypocrites to enjoy satire of global destroyers while we accelerate and adapt to global destruction is obviously correct. But it makes for very limited entertainment. Which is the point.
32
As long as it doesn’t give me fraudulent blood tests!
I really don't think you are ready for this doc
31
The more you cry about media in either direction, the more you infantilize the electorate and concede that the median voter cannot think for themselves and make informed policy decisions. This is a massive problem for a free society! Freedom ain’t free & we don’t want it.
idk how we're ever going to deal w/ how much of the public square is controlled by a couple billionaires who tweak the algorithm & allow disinfo to spread against the left all around the world. we have no way to combat it. these guys are spreading maga all over the world
1
50
The bull case is that A24, Neon, and other smaller independents get better distribution as reward for better quality than Skydance slop and theaters stay alive thanks to new innovative art made outside centrally planned massive corporate machines. And they don’t sell to Skydance.
If you want to know why I think Skydance is a nuke for Hollywood, here's why: They’re committing to 30+ theatrical movies a year while carrying roughly $80 billion in debt and billions annually in interest expense. They can finance those movies. That’s not the problem. The problem is whether audiences show up enough to justify producing, marketing and distributing a new movie every 12 days. Yes. Skydance needs to release a new movie roughly every 12 days. If Skydance floods theaters with movies that underperform, they hurt themselves first. Less revenue, weaker margins, more pressure on financing and more incentive to cut costs. But the damage doesn't stop there. Theaters depend on a steady flow of movies that actually make money. If enough Skydance releases fail to perform, theaters take that hit too. Marginal locations become harder to justify, screens disappear and the entire theatrical market gets weaker. Then Disney, Universal, Sony, Amazon and everyone else inherit the fallout. With fewer viable screens and a weaker theatrical marketplace, those studios become even more dependent on huge IP-driven movies to generate a return. Smaller movies become riskier. Original movies get squeezed. Budgets become harder to justify. That's the nuke. Skydance doesn't have to collapse to hurt Hollywood. It just has to stumble badly enough that everybody else gets caught in the blast radius...and die from the fallout.
73
Even our titans of industry lack the curiosity and focus to explore the implications of their very own ideas. Extreme wealth and constant digital stimulation destroy any reason to do the difficult work of thinking. Forget the question of whether AI thinks. WE don’t think.
My favorite part of this article is one of the visiting scholars pointing out that by Olah’s logic he is by far the worst slaver in history and he must immediately give up this abhorrent and immensely lucrative project, which anthropic people ignored.
27
The good news artistically is nearly all these brands have been cooked for years. Sheridan has left Paramount, all the news and reality is trash, 🏀 has left TNT… The only remaining concerns are Warner movies (Mike & Pam are out as of today), HBO shows, and Batman.
1
91
LETS GOOOOOOO
David Fincher has exited his deal with Netflix. The partnership lasted 13 years.
34
A perfect best of both worlds is theoretically possible, but no one has invested the creative effort in thoughtfully painting this picture. Everyone either doesn’t care b/c they already benefit, or doesn’t care b/c they think they’ll never benefit. Disincentivized to think.
A paradox in pro-AI rhetoric is that they want to tout the idea of massive productivity benefits (not just random slop) but deny massive labor market disruptions, when I don't think it's possible to have one without the other.
37