Independent journal of legal scholarship, published and edited by students since 1887.
Cambridge, MA, USA
Joined April 2009
- Tweets2.7K
- Following373
- Followers46.9K
- Likes349
Pinned Tweet
This month, we published Issue 6 of Volume 139 at harvardlawreview.org/archive…!
Our April print edition feature a @tannerallread article titled “Indigenous Constitutionalism" (harvardlawreview.org/print/v…).
Harvard Law Review retweeted
Terrific (and admirably concise) analysis by Alex Zhao about why access to the Anthropic models is probably not a technology release under relevant export control laws.
harvardlawreview.org/blog/20…
Harvard Law Review retweeted
Just published! @HarvLRev's print symposium "Judicial Review in Jeopardy?"
It's been a highlight of my career to help lead this collaboration.
Here's the start of my intro, "To Keep Government Generally Within the Bounds of Law," an homage to Fallon. See the full issue🔗 below!
Harvard Law Review retweeted
"Overextension of IEEPA and the resulting strengthening of judicial responses to assertions of IEEPA authority have consequences for the government’s litigation position in 𝘓.𝘊. and the sister cases."
—Opinion by Professor @ElenaChachko via @HarvLRev: bit.ly/4vUfuYJ
Harvard Law Review retweeted
New for @HarvLRev blog on the litigation against Trump’s ICC IEEPA sanctions. The case of Francesca Albanese, designated under those measures, is currently before the D.C. Circuit:
"Overextension of IEEPA and the resulting strengthening of judicial responses to assertions of IEEPA authority have consequences for the government’s litigation position in 𝘓.𝘊. and the sister cases."
—Opinion by Professor @ElenaChachko via @HarvLRev: bit.ly/4vUfuYJ
And the second is “Who Decides How to Decarbonize? Environmental Justice and Democratic Decisionmaking in California Climate Regulations” by Law Review Fellow Amelia Keyes (harvardlawreview.org/forum/v…).
In addition, the Forum published two new Essays this month. The first is “The U.S. Supreme Court and the ‘Inferior’ Courts: Siblings or Distant Cousins?” by retired Judge Diane P. Wood (harvardlawreview.org/forum/v…).
Chapter Three discussed the decline and fall of the state executive council as a widespread institution (harvardlawreview.org/print/v…), and
Chapter Four explored home rule and the balance of power between states and municipalities (harvardlawreview.org/print/v…).
Chapter One explored the "history and tradition" of substantive due process in state constitutions (harvardlawreview.org/print/v…).
Chapter Two detailed the enforcement of state constitutions through constitutional torts (harvardlawreview.org/print/v…).
The April issue is a special one for student writing, including four brand-new chapters of our “Developments in the Law” series. This year, the series focused on state constitutional law.
It also featured a review of Professor @Akhil_Reed_Amar’s book, Born Equal, by Professor Evan D. Bernick (harvardlawreview.org/print/v…).
March's HLR Forum is live at harvardlawreview.org/forum! It features essays from Michael Dreeben and Hagan Scotten on the continued relevance of Justice Robert Jackson's famous address, "The Federal Prosecutor."
Harvard Law Review retweeted
Grateful and a little surprised to see my forthcoming HLR Forum piece on vaccines and religious freedom included in Adam Liptak’s “What I’m Reading” in @nytimes
nytimes.com/2026/03/12/us/th…
Professor Jonathan Glater explains the federal law surrounding university accreditation and its relationship to recent events. Read "Controlling Higher Education Through Accreditation” here: harvardlawreview.org/blog/20….
Issue 5 is now live at harvardlawreview.org/archive…! This issue features What is a Tort? by Prof. @ketanrama; a review by Prof. Jonathan Glater of Prof. @mvadams12's The Containment; five student notes; and three student case comments.
An Essay by John “Yahya” Moore and Harvard Law Review fellow Thomas Roberts, “The Finley Failure: An Empirical Account of How Finley ‘No-Merit’ Letters Foster a Culture of Unethical Lawyering and Undermine the Rule of Law,” is now available on the Forum:
harvardlawreview.org/forum/v…
We are excited to publish two new pieces on the Forum! Professor Hiroshi Motomura has written a Response to “Federalism and the New National Security.” Read “The New National Security and the Old Federalism: Finding a Path Forward”:
harvardlawreview.org/forum/v…
Harvard Law Review retweeted
Hot off the presses, Dave Pozen’s and my new piece in @HarvLRev on what is broken in how we regulate marijuana, kratom, opioids, and other drugs—and how to fix it. Admin law meets public health meets LPE meets drug law meets harm reduction. Check it out!
harvardlawreview.org/print/v…
Issue 4 is now live at harvardlawreview.org/archive…! This issue features an article by Professors @mjblawrence and David Pozen on Drug Scheduling as Institutional Design; a review by @granick of @OrinKerr's The Digital Fourth Amendment; two student notes; and three student comments.