Law professor @EmoryLaw researching health law, admin law, and addictions.

Atlanta, GA
Joined January 2014
Replying to @marknevitt
@marknevitt and I have been shouting for almost a year now that the long-term military appropriations in the OBBA (the ones that will steal the next House's influence over foreign affairs) are unconstitutional. Cool to see @DemocracyFwd file a complaint raising that claim.
1
1
3
164
Matthew B. Lawrence retweeted
NEW PAPER: Now up on @SSRN, my and @danielledonfro's "Constitutional Rights and General Private Law," forthcoming in @HarvLRev. Check it out! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
1
14
61
4,573
This is huge news...devil will be in the details. The history of settlements leading to public health benefits is murky, and industry standards can wind up benefiting industry in long run. A reason for those concerned to pay more attention to tech harms now, not less.
Breaking News: Meta reached a landmark settlement of up to $17.1 billion with 47 states, D.C. and U.S. territories and has to make major changes to its products over claims it endangered children with addictive social media platforms. nyti.ms/3UiXTfE
1
4
501
A great article on public health and settlements, but there are many others: law.stanford.edu/publication…... Also I joined Lubin and coauthors in discussing what a social media settlement ought to look like here: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4037…
2
79
Matthew B. Lawrence retweeted
To prevent a potential September government shutdown, Congress is considering legislation that would automatically fund the government if appropriations lapse. @mjblawrence, @marknevitt, and Amelia Powell highlight a potential constitutional problem with this legislation.
1
2
3
3,069
Matthew B. Lawrence retweeted
Replying to @RichardMRe
IMHO downsides of long articles are worth it because they enable law review editors, newbies, and lawyers outside particular "fields" to participate in legal scholarship, bringing diversity and innovation. This dilutes the power of elites in subfields, but that's feature not bug.
1
2
5
401
Wow, thank you Emily Hammond for a very thoughtful review of "Second-Class Administrative Law"! adlaw.jotwell.com/putting-a-…
3
17
1,330
Matthew B. Lawrence retweeted
And in long: I think this confusion just shows again how fundamentally broken our scheduling system is. Congress needs to step in and fix it, as Dave Pozen and I suggest in the Harvard Law Review: harvardlawreview.org/print/v…
1
1
17
1,228
Matthew B. Lawrence retweeted
Yes, sometimes it takes a change agent like President Trump to get things like cannabis more normalized in our society. Schedule I --> III is a big deal my comments on @thehill TV this morning
3
5
36
2,004
Matthew B. Lawrence retweeted
Some thoughts on the administration's move to reschedule marijuana.
10
7
2
47
2,750
(Continuing thread on marijuana rescheduling, I am bad at twitter): So--what did DOJ (Trump Admin) do today if it hasn't finished the lawful rulemaking process for rescheduling?
3
2
1
16
4,897
In short: You have a major step--the scheduling of the hearing in June--along with a clear signal that the Trump admin is going to reschedule. We also get this interim order that seems to be effective now, though it might be unlawful and might get enjoined...if it gets to court.
1
8
1,001
I'm a law professor, worked at DEA (during Biden) and OMB (during Trump 1), and just read through the marijuana rescheduling order. I'm going to share my preliminary thoughts about what is going on and what is next.
6
8
1
53
14,529
So how did this order today reschedule marijuana if it didn't follow the formal rulemaking process set out by law in 21 U.S.C. 811?
1
10
2,141
Thread continues here (I'm bad at twitter): xitter.cf/mjblawrence/status/204…
(Continuing thread on marijuana rescheduling, I am bad at twitter): So--what did DOJ (Trump Admin) do today if it hasn't finished the lawful rulemaking process for rescheduling?
2
1
6
3,474