Supporters of the @NewCollegeofFL takeover cite the school's trajectory towards failure under the old model. And yet, despite millions more dollars, the school is getting worse. I'd rather fail while trying to do the right thing.
heraldtribune.com/story/opin…
Jennifer Stisa Granick retweeted
Delighted to be in conversation with the amazing Ben Fountain this Saturday @OrindaBooks 3pm. If you’re in the east bay, join us. Free. Registration recommended. Link in bio.
I subscribed to @404mediaco today because their reporting is so excellent. If you are a privacy or security expert, it's a mistake to miss their coverage. You should take a look.
ACLU hiring NPAD Senior Policy Counsel (for reproductive freedom): aclu.org/careers/apply/?job=… #jobs
Good ole JD Vance, always good for a larf, bless his heart.
independent.co.uk/news/world…
Cat Missing in Yellowstone Returns Home to California After an 800-Mile Trek nytimes.com/2024/09/22/us/ca…
The NACDL's 4AC is looking for a new Resource Counsel: nacdl.org/Content/ResourceCo… (deadline Oct. 4).
#jobs
The best thing is, now you get to debate the sufficiency of evidence, rather than admit that your credulous old man believes whatever he sees on the Internet.
Such an obvious tactic, but people keep falling for it because we forget that they aren't interested in what happened.
First, make something up and then demand that other people prove that nothing like it ever happened. Then, if there is no evidence of your thing, assert that it must be a cover up. Do whatever you can to muddy the waters.
Jennifer Stisa Granick retweeted
We're in the 9th Circuit today, arguing on behalf of Muslim Americans challenging unconstitutional religious questioning by CBP.
Border officers target Muslims returning home for irrelevant and intrusive questions like "Do you pray every day?" More here: aclu.org/cases/kariye-v-mayo…
"I like this baseless fantasy this man made up, why are you all assuming it's wrong? Let's pay someone to come up with something/anything so we switch from the embarrassing "hallucination" to "experts disagree over the (paid for post hoc) 'evidence '".



