soft dissociation as a lifestyle choice. it's working better than therapy did

Joined October 2025
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
🔥 PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCEMENT @letsburnlab × @numbersprotocol LETSBURN 🤝 Numbers Protocol Combining real-world activity with verifiable digital provenance to build a more transparent, trusted, and rewarding digital economy. Move. Compete. Own. 🔥 #LETSBURN #NumbersProtocol #Web3
Numbers Protocol is partnering with @letsburnlab to explore how provenance can bring greater transparency to activity-driven digital economies. LETSBURN turns movement tracked through connected fitness apps into verified activity, competition, XP, and on-chain rewards. Numbers Protocol builds infrastructure to record and verify the origin and history of digital assets. Together, we'll explore how verifiable records can help people trace how real-world activity becomes a digital contribution. Move, compete, and build with confidence. More details to follow.
9
9
24
4,258
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
Possible was proven when Sabastian Sawe ran 1:59:30 at the #TCSLondonMarathon. Now, in partnership with TCS, the world recorder has written a letter to the runners of the 2026 #TCSAmsterdamMarathon. Share your goal for this weekend in the comments, you may just get a little extra encouragement. #WithYouForTheLongRun #OfficialSponsorofBreakthroughs
21
1,020
2
1,046
10,093
🔥 GURU TOKEN NOMINATION — HOW DOES IT WORK? Want your token to become the next Guru Token? It starts with nomination. Projects compete for BGB support. The top 10 advance to the final, where the community chooses one winner. Here's how to enter the race 🧵👇
45
272
600
52,547
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
NEW VISTORY ZEALY SPRINT STARTS TOMORROW The $2,500 USDT sprint ends today, Oct 15. But the quests don't stop. New sprint. New challenges. Another chance to stand out. What happens to your current entries? 🧵👇
59
280
303
22,023
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
Drew Pavlou the degenerate who other weak conservative men promote like idiots because they are dumb, overrated morons trying 'save Australia' as they sit on their asses and watch girls do it for them in anti crime jobs as they are busy online having 'intellectual discussions' @DrewPavlou said this: Just had a really interesting experience observing liberal art in New York City. Very fascinating what liberal artistic men can get up to if they have the right politics, like for example this Harvard PhD guy who once wrote for Jacobin called Stephen Squibb. My friend @BarneysRubble0 asks me to go to an Off-Off-Broadway show called “The Suitors of Helen.” I know nothing about it but I happily agree. I sit down and watch the first ten minutes, an extremely erotic simulated lesbian sex scene featuring hot actresses. Okay, I think to myself, I support this. Anyway, the play goes on, and things only become more intense. It ends up being 2 hours of simulated lesbian sex and orgasms in a small room above a bar. There are only ten people in attendance and all of them are watching these hardcore sex scenes next to me in this very intimate setting. Things get dark and strange. There are extended soliloquies about anal rape. One character speaks for 5 minutes about being anally raped by dozens of men at the same time, so much so that when she wakes up she cries tears of cum. And I’m just sitting there, and I’m thinking to myself, if you’re a white progressive man who went to Harvard and can pretend that this is an intellectual exercise that is really serious, you can somehow get like 8 actresses - many of them sexy women - to agree to work for free on a play like this for months. And apparently Mr Stephen Squibb has been staging this play for years now, restarting it at will. Honestly I’m not even criticising him, I think it’s good that he gets to enjoy the company of so many sexy women, he’s created his own personal harem, you have to actually admire this. He’s a great coach of lesbian sex. Every time they stage this play, he’s casting these sexy egirls, and he’s presumably coaching the lesbian sex scenes, working in intimate company with these hot actresses for months. This is the best life ever dreamed of for any man, all you have to do is have progressive politics, write for Jacobin, go to Harvard, and then you too can stage your own personal lesbian sex play with multiple hot actresses working on it for free for exposure or something, probably rehearsing for months I just really feel like if I tried to do a play like this - not that I necessarily want to, or that I even have this kind of content within my soul - I truly feel like I would be immediately put up against a wall and fucking shot into a ditch by every leftist on Earth. This is great work if you can finesse this for yourself Well done liberal New York artistic men Honestly I want to make it clear that I’m not attacking him, I just find it funny and interesting. Honestly good on him, one of the greatest swindles in history. “Hey everyone I need sexy actresses to act for free in my Off-Off-Broadway lesbian sex show, please let me know.” That’s awesome, an inner chud lives within him.
42
843
1
83
2,585
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
KOSPI futures bleeding like crazy It is now trading below the 200 DMA, dumping ~17%
37
22
144
31,657
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
There is no agenda these people will not push. You can clearly see Messi and the other Argentines shaking & hugging Benin players. Messi still gave the guy who was disturbing him for a selfie his request (even though Messi clearly wanted to enjoy his farewell uninterrupted).
#Benin assistant coach Tunde Adelakun: "What struck me was the very obvious and blatant refusal of the Argentina team to want to have anything to do with my team after the game. Handshakes at the end of the game were hurried and impersonal. And any attempt by our players to get close to the man they came to celebrate was rebuffed rather in a very hostile manner by the security operatives on ground. They clearly collectively did not want to be on the same place with my Benin team. It was rather disturbing." "Again toward the end of the lap, some of my players lined along what was to be his natural path to end the lap of honour. He was leading. My boys were there. Just wanting him to walk towards them and for them to applaud and appreciate him. Right at the very last moment, Leo made a wild detour and, consciously avoiding the crowd of Benin players that had formed, walked toward the centre of the pitch. That was a new low for a man revered by many and who, in many young African minds, could do no wrong." theafricanfootballclub.com/p…
2
126
3
1,567
15,638
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
Crypto Market Update by PAX 📈 7% Drop after US Gov move BTC worth $1B to exchange 👀 Most important charts, key levels and clear analysis for you, Toobiters 😉 youtu.be/DeXnmHLAGLw?si=qGyH… #Bitcoin #ethereum #Crypto #CryptoTrading #Toobit #BTC #USGov #BTC1B
32
30
29
16,407
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
Drew Pavlou is influencing a great number of conservatives atm including a number of my friends, and all sorts of conservatives promote his content including a number of Christians. He professes to be Christian but recently watched a play in New York about erotic homosexual sex and anal rape and bragged about it.. Recently he assaulted a bloke in New York and said it was 'self defence' although the guy who playfully struck him first was quite obviously not looking for a serious fight. I am actually concerned that lots of people and Christians don't hold other Christians accountable when they do stupid things. He is getting away with a lot, gains millions of views on some of his videos, and is seeping into the One Nation space, and so I have been warning people about him. He works for Karl Stefanovic. He is a problem for young conservatives and should be held accountable before he leads others astray. He also shares a dog with Emily Kim, a Labor Councillor who got a legal letter from One Nation. She is tied up with Chinese Communists and United Front efforts. As Christians we are not told to sit back, do and say nothing, when we witness sickness in others, especially if they garner sizeable platforms in politics that really do influence my gen of conservatives. If he isn't stopped, he will continue to influence my gen and already is influencing many of them. And he is interested in a political future. So if you want to promote his content, also offer him accountability when he deserves it otherwise he will get away with promoting degenerate behaviour. Think seriously about whether we want types like him gaining influence over my generation of conservatives, because that's exactly what's happening. His video of himself assaulting a protester he went up to with a microphone, garnered over 4.5 million views. If you want to promote his content, also criticise him when he deserves it. He promotes Peter Thiel repetitively, in the Epstein files. He is odd. His actions don't match his supposed politics and also he professes to be Christian. This is the sort of thing Drew gets up to in New York: Drew Pavlou: Just had a really interesting experience observing liberal art in New York City. Very fascinating what liberal artistic men can get up to if they have the right politics, like for example this Harvard PhD guy who once wrote for Jacobin called Stephen Squibb. My friend @BarneysRubble0 asks me to go to an Off-Off-Broadway show called “The Suitors of Helen.” I know nothing about it but I happily agree. I sit down and watch the first ten minutes, an extremely erotic simulated lesbian sex scene featuring hot actresses. Okay, I think to myself, I support this. Anyway, the play goes on, and things only become more intense. It ends up being 2 hours of simulated lesbian sex and orgasms in a small room above a bar. There are only ten people in attendance and all of them are watching these hardcore sex scenes next to me in this very intimate setting. Things get dark and strange. There are extended soliloquies about anal rape. One character speaks for 5 minutes about being anally raped by dozens of men at the same time, so much so that when she wakes up she cries tears of cum. And I’m just sitting there, and I’m thinking to myself, if you’re a white progressive man who went to Harvard and can pretend that this is an intellectual exercise that is really serious, you can somehow get like 8 actresses - many of them sexy women - to agree to work for free on a play like this for months. And apparently Mr Stephen Squibb has been staging this play for years now, restarting it at will. Honestly I’m not even criticising him, I think it’s good that he gets to enjoy the company of so many sexy women, he’s created his own personal harem, you have to actually admire this. He’s a great coach of lesbian sex. Every time they stage this play, he’s casting these sexy egirls, and he’s presumably coaching the lesbian sex scenes, working in intimate company with these hot actresses for months. This is the best life ever dreamed of for any man, all you have to do is have progressive politics, write for Jacobin, go to Harvard, and then you too can stage your own personal lesbian sex play with multiple hot actresses working on it for free for exposure or something, probably rehearsing for months I just really feel like if I tried to do a play like this - not that I necessarily want to, or that I even have this kind of content within my soul - I truly feel like I would be immediately put up against a wall and fucking shot into a ditch by every leftist on Earth. This is great work if you can finesse this for yourself Well done liberal New York artistic men Honestly I want to make it clear that I’m not attacking him, I just find it funny and interesting. Honestly good on him, one of the greatest swindles in history. “Hey everyone I need sexy actresses to act for free in my Off-Off-Broadway lesbian sex show, please let me know.” That’s awesome, an inner chud lives within him. @drew
1
199
6
577
14,451
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
I've been thinking about what AI agents will actually change about trading. Finding information was never the hardest part for me. Knowing when to act, when to wait, and when to protect capital is. AI can automate the research, monitor setups and execute predefined rules. But if the strategy is bad, automation just helps me lose money faster. The edge isn't letting AI trade everything. It's knowing exactly what I should let it do and what I shouldn't.
77
26
2
167
13,899
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
Manchester City danced with their own notoriety at Anfield and embraced their shame. A club found guilty of cheating is prospering. It was another bad day for the English game dailymail.com/sport/football…
1,138
1,062
196
6,883
746,299
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
What Will You Do When God Asks for Your Isaac? "Anyone who loves his father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me; and anyone who does not take up his cross and follow Me is not worthy of Me." — Matthew 10:37–38 We may have surrendered every sin we know— and still not have surrendered our heart. We stopped doing what was wrong. We resisted temptation. We mastered habits that once mastered us. We turned away from anger, lust, greed, bitterness, pride. And because we have learned to say no to sin, we think we have learned to give God everything. But Jesus gives a far more disturbing measure. He does not say: “Anyone who loves sin more than Me is not worthy of Me.” He says: father. mother. son. daughter. He does not name what is evil. He names what is precious. Then He says: If you love them more than Me, you are not worthy of Me. Turning away from evil is necessary. But it is not the final test of the heart. The first lesson comes through Cain: Master sin. The second comes through Abraham: Surrender your Isaac. The first is to surrender what is evil. The second is to surrender what is precious. And there is a third lesson, which Job will teach us later: What happens when what is precious is not merely surrendered—but taken? Each lesson goes deeper. The first test asks: Will you surrender what is evil for God? The second asks: Will you surrender what is precious for God? The first reveals whether we will obey God. The second reveals the order of our love. The first asks: Is God truly your Master? The second asks: Is God truly your greatest love? A servant can obey because the Master commands. But Abraham’s test reaches beyond duty. It reaches into affection. It asks whether the One we obey is also the One we love above all. Cain faced sin. Abraham faced Isaac. Sin separates us from God. Isaac came from God. Sin was something Cain had to master. Isaac was God’s promise. God’s gift. God’s blessing. Yet either can stand between the heart and God. Sin draws us away from God. A blessing can quietly take God’s place. It is one thing to surrender what God condemns. It is another to surrender what God Himself placed in our hands. Isaac was not Abraham’s sin. Isaac was the fulfilment of God’s word. God had promised Abraham a son. Then Abraham waited. Year after year passed. He grew old. Sarah grew old. The promise moved beyond improbability toward impossibility. Then Isaac came. The impossible child. The promised child. The laughter that came after decades of waiting. By the time Isaac arrived, the promise carried the weight of a lifetime. Imagine what Isaac must have meant to Abraham. He was not merely a son. He was longing fulfilled. He was hope made visible. He was evidence that God had remembered. He carried Abraham’s future. His descendants. His covenant. His promise. Everything Abraham had waited for seemed to have taken human form in Isaac. Then God said: "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love… and offer him." God names everything that makes the command unbearable. Your son. Your only son. Isaac. Whom you love. God does not reach for something Abraham despises. He reaches for what had become most precious. And this is where the story becomes frightening. Why give Abraham Isaac— then ask for Isaac? Why allow decades of longing, promise, future and love to gather around one child— then ask Abraham to place that child on an altar? From the human side, the command can appear cruel. But God is not testing whether Abraham loves Isaac. He already knows he does. The test is whether Abraham loves Isaac more than Him. That is a test we may never know we need until God touches what we treasure. We know when we are holding sin. We do not always know when a blessing has begun to hold us. A child is good. Marriage is good. Security is good. A calling is good. Success can be good. A dream can be good. An answered prayer is good. The danger is not that the blessing changes. The danger is that its place in our heart changes. God gives with an open hand. We receive with an open hand. Then somewhere along the way— our fingers close. The gift has not changed. Our relationship to it has. "I love this." becomes: "I need this." And eventually: "God may have everything—but not this." That is the closed hand of the heart. A child does it instinctively. Give him a sweet and reach for it. His fingers close. His body tightens. Mine. Adults grow older. The fist merely moves inside. My child. My marriage. My future. My reputation. My security. My dream. My Isaac. We may surrender many things to God while quietly keeping one thing beyond His reach. A secret reserve. A non-negotiable. The baseline beneath our faith. We will obey God—as long as He does not touch it. We will trust God—as long as He protects it. We will call God good—as long as He allows us to keep it. And because our Isaac may be something God Himself gave us, we may never suspect that it has become a rival. That is what makes Isaac more deceptive than sin. We know we must never love sin. But who tells us when we have begun to love a blessing too much? Sin announces rebellion. Isaac arrives as promise. Sin makes us run from God. Isaac can sit beside God in the heart—until one day we discover that we cannot choose between them. A blessing becomes an idol not when it ceases to be good, but when it becomes too precious to surrender. Perhaps that is why the heart must sometimes be tested. Not because God needs to discover what is inside it. But because we do. Abraham may never have known what place Isaac occupied in his heart until God asked for him. Neither may we. Many believers stop after the lesson of Cain. They resist temptation. They leave obvious sins behind. They become disciplined. Respectable. Obedient. What once mastered them no longer does. And they assume they have reached the summit. But freedom from sin is not yet proof of wholehearted love. A heart can stop serving evil and remain divided. We can master anger while refusing to surrender ambition. We can overcome greed while building our identity around success and not God. We can resist lust while making another person indispensable to our happiness. We can tear down obvious idols while enthroning God's blessings in their place. God wants more than the removal of evil. He wants the whole heart. Jesus said: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind." All. That word leaves nowhere to hide. No hidden sin. No protected chamber. No private reserve. No untouchable Isaac. This is why Jesus' words about father, mother, son and daughter are so severe. He does not tell us not to love them. He assumes we will. He names some of the deepest loves the human heart can know—and places Himself above them. The issue is not whether you love your child deeply. You should. The issue is whether that love remains beneath your love for God. God did not ask Abraham to love Isaac less. If Isaac meant little to Abraham, Moriah would mean nothing. There is no surrender in giving away what the heart does not value. The test had power precisely because Abraham loved Isaac. Abraham had been given every reason to treasure him. Then God touched precisely what had become most precious. Could Abraham treasure Isaac without making Isaac ultimate? Could he receive the gift without letting it displace the Giver? Could he hold Isaac—without closing his hand around him? That is the Isaac test. Not: Do you love what God has given you? But: Do you love the Giver more? And Abraham's test goes deeper still. Isaac did not merely carry Abraham's love. Isaac carried God's promise. God had said: "It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned." Then God told Abraham to offer Isaac. This means Abraham could have resisted God— with God's own promise in his hand. "Lord, You said through Isaac." That is what makes Moriah astonishing. Abraham was not merely being asked to surrender what he wanted. He was being asked to surrender what appeared necessary for God's own word to come true. Isaac was emotionally precious. But he also seemed theologically indispensable. Take Isaac away— and what happens to the promise? Abraham had every reason to cling. Instead, he obeyed. Hebrews tells us why. He reasoned that God could raise the dead. Abraham did not decide that God's promise had failed. He decided that even death could not make God unfaithful. God had said: Through Isaac. God now said: Offer Isaac. Abraham could not reconcile the two. But he trusted God more than he trusted his ability to reconcile them. And here lies an even deeper surrender. Abraham had to surrender not only Isaac. He had to surrender his understanding of how God could remain faithful without Isaac. That reaches us too. Sometimes our Isaac is not merely something we love. It is something we believe God needs to fulfil His purpose for us. This career must succeed— because God called me. This relationship must survive— because God gave it to me. This ministry cannot fail— because God began it. This future must unfold as I imagined— because I believed God promised it. Without realising it, we may stop trusting God— and begin trusting our understanding of how God must act. Abraham had to let even that go. God did not need Abraham to preserve Isaac to preserve His promise. God needed only to remain God. That was enough for Abraham. So he walked. He carried the fire. Isaac carried the wood. "Father?" "Yes, my son?" "The fire and the wood are here, but where is the lamb?" "God Himself will provide." Isaac did not know what those words cost. Abraham did. Every step up Moriah brought him closer to surrendering the person his heart had waited a lifetime to hold. Then came the altar. The wood. The binding. The knife. And only then: "Do not lay a hand on the boy." Isaac lived. The knife never entered him. But something had already died on Moriah. Abraham's right to say: This is mine. Perhaps that was the true sacrifice. Not Isaac. The closed hand. Abraham went up the mountain holding the son he could not imagine losing. He came down holding the same son— but no longer as something God was forbidden to touch. The son remained. The love remained. The promise remained. But the order of Abraham's heart had been revealed. Isaac was precious. God was more precious. That is the difference between love and possession. Love says: "You are precious to me." Possession says: "You must remain mine." Love receives. Possession claims. Love holds with gratitude. Possession closes the hand. Love says: "Thank You for this gift." Possession says: "If You take this gift, You are no longer enough for me." That is when the gift has become more than a gift. It has become a condition placed upon God. And now the question becomes far more searching than: What sins have you surrendered? The question is: What may God not touch? What would make something inside you cry: Anything but this. Your child? Your marriage? Your future? Your health? Your reputation? Your success? Your calling? The dream you have spent decades pursuing? The prayer you waited years to see answered? What is your Isaac? This does not mean that losing an Isaac should not devastate us. Deep grief is not idolatry. A mother may lose her child and feel as though part of her has died. That does not prove she loved wrongly. Jesus wept. Faith does not turn flesh into stone. The heart can break and still belong wholly to God. The deeper question is not: Would this loss break me? It is: Would this loss make me turn away from God? Have we quietly made something the condition upon which God is allowed to remain good? "I will trust You— as long as You leave this alone." That is where the heart is exposed. Sin is different. We already know sin must go. Isaac is what we believe we have every right to keep. That is why surrendering Isaac reaches deeper than mastering sin. Cain teaches us: Do not let evil master you. Abraham teaches us: Do not let even what is good possess you. And Job will eventually lead us into a darker place still: What happens when what is precious is not merely surrendered—but taken? But that is another journey. For now, we remain on Moriah. Jesus' words stand over Abraham— and over us: "Anyone who loves his son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me." The first lesson reveals whether we will obey God. The second reveals whom we love most. The first asks: Is God your Master? The second asks: Is God your greatest love? This is why the greatest commandment does not merely tell us to obey God. It tells us to love Him: with all your heart. All. Not what remains after our Isaacs have taken their share. Not everything except one protected corner. All. No secret reserve. No untouchable possession. No closed hand. The deepest surrender is not revealed by what we willingly give God. It is revealed when He reaches for what we never intended to give. Cain could not surrender what was evil. Abraham was willing to surrender what was precious. Moriah revealed what ordinary obedience could never reveal: whom Abraham loved most. Isaac remained in Abraham's arms. But God remained on the throne of Abraham's heart. Abraham did not raise the knife because Isaac meant little. He raised it because God meant more. Only the heart that loves Him completely is willing to obey Him, both in life and through death.
1
153
1
311
51,199
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
To the man who killed my best friend, my sister, my person... 💔An open letter to a drunk driver. (Probably one of the most vulnerable and emotional things I've ever written.) I miss you, K. 💜💜 #DrunkDriving Link: vocal.media/humans/an-open-l…
178
2,917
39
841
748,966
DadaBrand💪🔥 retweeted
Just minted another @ThePandarianz Gen1 Banger! Loving this one!
20
17
31
237