Open-source cleanup verification protocol. Pick up trash. Prove it onchain. Earn governance over real funding. Live on Base + Celo

Ko Pha-ngan, Thailand
Joined March 2024
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @kennyistyping
Creating digital Singapore - that’s the whole summary of this disaster Live in your Singapore dude, don’t impose this shit lifestyle to others
10
Replying to @nicky_sap
Coincidentally, we got our product off there a week or two before) And thanks for the hint about Juke, will see if it fits
1
14
bye FC just right on time we removed the miniapp from there 👋
Ok had some time to sleep on this. My problems with the new Balaji rules for Farcaster and why I voted no: - The consent is coerced. "Not now" and "Vote to leave" both make your account read-only. You either submit or lose your voice in the client you built your audience on. - It isn't really a vote. Voting to stay means handing the core team the power to rewrite the Network Code whenever they like, with no ongoing say for you. That's closer to a loyalty oath than to democracy, and the onchain NFT makes who signed public and permanent. Plus dangling an NFT to a web3 audience feels like an attempt to buy votes from degens who love minting NFTs. - The rules reach back in time. The new code applies to your past posts, written before any of these rules existed. I’ve seen countless reports of users being banned already the minute they log back in, from something they said years ago. - The standards are vague. "Starting or feeding fights," "low-quality posts," "clear hoaxes" and "hyping token prices repeatedly" can stretch to cover almost any dissent. HIGHLY subjective and becomes a kingdom, not a democracy. - "Rule of code" is mostly marketing. The prompts can change at any time, they admit to "manual judgment calls," and nothing mentions appeals or notice before a penalty. - Membership is ideological. The app is pitched as a community "for techno-optimists," and people who "don't like the idea of Singapore" are told to leave. That filters people by viewpoint, not conduct. And Singapore is a strange model to pick for speech, given its fake-news law and its record of defamation suits. I am a proud techno-optimist. But I am also a proud freedom of speech absolutist, and proponent of decentralization. Calling this approach “techno optimism” feels more like gaslighting and a power trip on Balaji’s part to me.
1
1
68
Replying to @LefterisJP
Those who recommend to go to Bavaria - nah thanks) uptight people who love alcohol more than weed 😆
313
yeah still surviving with our budget 🤞🤓 and hanging out there until the time is right to bloom
1
106
Was sceptical from the beginning for the payouts promised, plus it is really taking long time to receive them. But who are we to judge, health issues are not a joke and knowing Rene for a bit even virtually - he doesn’t look like a person who could fake the things in any way
1
79
Replying to @IrthuSuresh
No way, the legend is gone. Rest in peace fluffy friend
16
Replying to @WasabiNetwork
The way crypto gives grants is so stupid lol no outcomes just vibes things that could make a big difference probably cost less than 10k and one determined person, and yet millions go to groups of people by means of nepotism. sad.
1
56
But listen, sometimes things are temporary. We also came across Atlantis dao page shut off but then found it working again)
1
20
Couldn’t move on with the day without knowing who it was, so I did agent research who ended up showing me PGN chain as a result) so I guess if I really wanna know, I should do manual research. Or buy off the insider info from you, to satisfy the curiosity
1
1
20
Replying to @superdapp
Gm and to you too
1
Also in v2: a smart contract update, security hardening and an AI service upgrade, rolled out step by step in the open-source app. Tell us in the comments on Gardens what would make logging a cleanup more fun. app.gardens.fund/gardens/422…
5
Every cleanup gets a proof level: A · photos + verifier B · taken in Cleanup mode C · plus a bags or scale photo D · plus a second verifier or partner on site Level A stays valid. Higher levels unlock funding rounds.
1
8
How it works: tap Start and snap the before photo. Tap +1 bag as you go. Snap the after photo and the bags. Place, time and duration are recorded for you. Team members join by QR and everyone gets credit.
2
2
24
Gm all Methodology v2 is up for a community vote on Gardens Easier cleanups, stronger proof: · Cleanup mode: start, +1 bag, finish · Proof levels A to D · Smarter checks for verifiers · Better photo AI · Fairer verification · Honest numbers Vote here: app.gardens.fund/gardens/422…
4
3
5
98