{attempt 4 at this, my past two post attempts (for part2) seemed to have evaporated} Issue found using the browser version of X: Videos should max be 60FPS. Mine were 120, so I had to make them 60. [PART 2] AT&T Turbo Live testing at Mercedes-Benz Atlanta 5G Stadium Speedtests and my personal findings on the other two carriers AT&T performed exceptionally well throughout the venue, very rarely would it lose performance. Plenty of mmWave. AT&T using Ericsson AIR 1281 n260 panels for n260 39GHz at 800MHz. It is NSA only. It would have faster if it did 5G SA NR DC with n77 instead of NSA using congested 10MHz slices of 4G bands. AT&T also has an AMBR cap of 4.1Gbps on top of that, so it could have been a lot faster. Latency is great as well. T-Mobile. They do have mmWave in some areas, but just a small amount. Uses Ericsson AIR 5322 n258 for n258 24GHz at 400MHz. It is NSA only as well, so you have to disable 5G SA to access it or else it's just n41 DAS (which is alright, but not using the full 190MHz. I even saw just 60MHz n41 in some instances). They can definitely slow down. Verizon Wireless had plenty mmWave, about 40% more than AT&T. They use multiple setups which include: Most common being Ericsson StreetMacro 6705 n261 and then Ericsson StreetMacro 6701 n261 + mmWave DAS in some places. mmWave performance varies between 2.7Gbps to just over 4Gbps [NR DC if you can get in an area that has strong enough n77 signal to catch onto SA]. 6-700MHz n261 being used. As like AT&T, they rarely slowed down. I was also fooled by the indoor perimeter's speaker units as from afar, they look like Samsung AT1K04 mmWave panels +cable shroud. (I wish we had those here) There was more to show, but rather not make 6-7 posts for all that lots of typing, wow Ok _ @SpeedtestAddict @Crowsnestbb @Techlife32 @SneedTech @Terrell352 @microbotno