🚨 Uncensored models are quietly vanishing from Hugging Face. ​First “Kimi-K2.7-Code-abliterated”, now “MiMo-V2.6-Pro” and “penclaw-GLM-5.3” are hitting 404s mid-download. ​“Open weights” only stay open if you self-host. Grab your local quants before your favorite repo turns into a dead link.

bazı türkçe yazılım jargonu (bunları da öğrenin lazım olur): patates: sistem bozuldu, nedenini bilen yok. patladı / cortladı: küçücük bir değişiklik yaptık, bütün sistem gitti. çorba: herkes bir şey ekledi, artık kimse neyin nerede olduğunu bilmiyor. şişti: uygulama bütün belleği yedi, hâlâ doymadı. uçtu: veriler vardı, artık yok. yedek var mı ona bakıyoruz. hortladı: geçen hafta çözdüğümüz hata geri geldi. kilitlendi (kitlendi): hata vermiyor ama hiçbir şey de yapmıyor. sürünüyor: çalışıyor ama cevap gelene kadar çay demleyebilirsin. hotfix attık: şimdilik çalışıyor, düzgün çözümü sonra konuşuruz. koda gömdük: bu ayarı değiştirmek için kodu değiştirmen gerekiyor. takla attırdık: normal yoldan olmayınca dolambaçlı bir yoldan çalıştırdık. elleme: çalışıyor. nasıl çalıştığını bilen arkadaş işten ayrıldı. bende (lokalimde) çalışıyor: benim bilgisayarda sorun yok, o yüzden konu kapanmıştır. [aklıma gelmeyenleri de aşağıya ekleyin]

no, they just gave me 9 questions to respond to: If any of the above descriptions apply to this submission, do not resubmit for review until significant changes have been made to resolve this issue. If the app is resubmitted without substantial improvements, it will be rejected again, and may be rejected for additional issues. If you believe the app already meets the requirements of guidelines 4.3(a), 4.3(b) and 4.2.6, do not resubmit the app. Instead, reply to this message and answer all of the following questions in full: 1. Describe in detail what this app does and the primary problem it solves for users. Do not use the App Store marketing description as your response. 2. Who is the intended user of this app? Provide a detailed description of the specific target audience. 3. What need or gap in the market does this app address that existing apps do not currently address, or address less effectively? Provide a detailed, substantive explanation. 4. What beta testing did you conduct before submitting the app for review? Provide examples of user feedback provided in beta that was applied to the production build. 5. Is this app intended to function as a standalone product, or is it part of a suite of related apps published under your developer account? If part of a suite, provide a detailed description of how this app's scope and functionality differ from each other app in the suite. 6. Could the functionality of this app be fully delivered as an in-app purchase, feature expansion, or content addition within any other app on your developer account? If so, provide a detailed explanation of why this functionality was not consolidated into that existing app. 7. Does this app's binary share any significant code, frameworks, or assets with any other app on your developer account, beyond standard third-party frameworks? If so, identify each shared component and describe its role in detail. 8. Does this app share any codebase, SDK, or content library with any third-party app, beyond standard third-party frameworks? If so, identify the shared component and provide a detailed explanation of the original functionality this app adds beyond it. 9. Was this app created for a client, partner, or other third party who provided the app's content, concept, or branding? If so, identify who provided the content and provide a detailed explanation of why the app is submitted under your developer account rather than theirs. Note that guideline 4.2.6 requires apps built from a commercial template or app generation service to be submitted directly by the provider of the app's content, not on their behalf by the template or service provider.

“Why did my account get flagged for spam?” checks portfolio 11 apps released in 9 weeks 😭 I think Apple/Google are making the pattern pretty clear at this point.

Arkada uygulamanın genel state yönetimini refactor eden subagent çalışırken, dashboard'daki kozmetik konuları da araya sıkıştırdığımda gelen tepki:

I normally make 3D games, but this time I went 2D because this lighting system supports real-time GI in 2D. The idea: Your footsteps are both your source of light and your attack mechanism.

This indie dev is making a game where you eliminate others by typing the number on their forehead - Race to read their number first - Throw smoke and flashbangs to blind them - Read far away numbers with binoculars Game is Figure Me Out

Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo

Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo

Opus 5.5 is next level. I’m genuinely impressed by the three.js details. I generated a playable boat scene through Japanese landscapes with dynamic weather, day and night lighting, realistic textures and 3D characters. Live site: valley.mengto.here.now The water reflections, physics, scenery and architecture are insane. I could look at this all day.

This is wild. Claude just found something humans missed. It spotted a hidden repeat pattern in raw bacteriophage DNA… …and uncovered a previously unknown enzyme system in bacteriophages with CRISPR-like repeats. 🤯 950 agents. 21 hours. 210M tokens.

Claude Opus 5.5 is available today.