Matt retweeted
Replying to @GenocideSmurf
More likely: Vance thinks the Crackpot Coalition will give him the numbers he needs to fend off a challenge from the old coalition of traditional limited-government conservatives and free-market types in the primary.
He has more or less stated as much in his tirades against "Fusionism 2.0" and his conspiracy theories about the "libertarian donor network" that supposedly controls the right.
Vance's strategy right now is to build up the Crackpot Coalition as a preemptive buffer against an expected challenge from the mainstream right. This includes:
- Use Tucker Carlson and other "influencers" to normalize racists and desensitize the public to them through bigotry-fatigue, so that by 2028 "normie" voters are not immediately repulsed by their outsized presence in the Vance coalition
- Stack the administrative state, the postliberal think tank scene, and the political apparatus of Trumpworld with radical-reactionary intern types who are intentionally selected and curated for edgelord bigotry and personal loyalty to the postliberal cause. Vance-controlled groups like American Moment have made this their explicit mission, along with keeping out free-market and limited government types.
- Deploy the hyperonline Vanceguard activists to harass, bully, smear, and cancel anyone who criticizes Vance, no matter how valid, and to cultivate a public perception that Vance is the inevitable heir apparent to Trump. This is the whole grifter scene's mission at the moment around Posobiec and similar trashcasters.
Matt retweeted
This is just embarrassingly incompetent "economic" reasoning.
Tariffs affect a consumer surplus transfer to the beneficiary industry by specifically and intentionally raising prices. Wishcasting about some future price decrease in their wake is not a serious argument.
Tariffs of this sort don't aim at raising prices for their own sake, but on establishing incentives for investment in American industry which, once productive, has its own reasons to reduce prices. | @michaelbd
nationalreview.com/corner/no…
Lutnick is a menace. He reportedly also caused problems with the Canada deal a few months ago. He intervened and disrupted it at the last minute because he thought Greer’s framework was too generous to Canada. Continuing the trade war with Canada is one of several dumb, self-inflicted wounds that have hurt Trump and the GOP.
"Lutnick Throws the Future of U.S.-Mexico Trade Talks Into Further Doubt" share.google/YCB36qc3EcCd3ow…
"A senior Mexican official said that every time both sides get close to a deal, the Trump administration brings up something else that it wants"
Matt retweeted
I found the NatCon tariff protectionist version of the Marxist randos who come onto my feed and declare "You haven't read Marx!"
Replying to @PhilWMagness
Yo Phil, America has had tariffs for 237....that's TWO HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN years. You might want to do a little research before you post something stupid.
Matt retweeted
Inflation, which was the major complaint MAGA had against Biden, is now accelerating.
And MAGA is silent.
Pathetic hypocrites, the lot of them.
Matt retweeted
You guys remember when Republicans used to criticize Democrats for imposing costly, convoluted taxes and then giving some Americans their own money back?
I remember.
insidetrade.com/daily-news/h…
Matt retweeted
Thanks Trump.
Inflation on many everyday items was entirely due to tariffs, NY Fed says cnb.cx/4hxR5nA
Matt retweeted
“The protectionist never bothers to ask what are the domestic industries that contract or even disappear because of his protectionist measures.”
- Donald Boudreaux 👀
Matt retweeted
The trade deficit, which is not a problem, was a reason that Trump imposed his moronic tariffs. The initial levels were even based on bilateral deficits. A year and a half later, the deficit is higher, prices are higher, and US buyers bore the tax burden. Very Trumpian.
The trade deficit hit a 17-month high — 18 months after historic tariffs were supposed to fix it.
Tariffs can't fundamentally alter the trade deficit, which is driven by macroeconomic factors, including government deficit spending, explains Cato's @scottlincicome on @MSNOWNews.
Historic tariffs didn't fix the trade deficit – Scott Lincicome
Matt retweeted
Running record deficits during non-crisis times: bad idea.
The federal budget deficit totaled $2.0 trillion in fiscal year 2026, the Congressional Budget Office estimates, $218 billion more than the deficit recorded in fiscal year 2025. cbo.gov/publication/61985
Matt retweeted
Congress just passed a law giving Trump the power to impose new tariffs on major buyers of Russian oil & gas.
Can America tariff America?
Matt retweeted
"U.S. Budget Deficit Jumps to Nearly $2 Trillion" wsj.com/politics/policy/u-s-…
"budget experts expect the deficit to surpass 6% of GDP, compared with 5.8% in fiscal 2025."
Silver lining from @djheakin: "They could have blown it up worse, and they wanted to, some of them" 😭
J.D. Vance accidentally comes out as a socialist reason.com/2026/10/08/j-d-va…































