Truth, justice and the freedom to wear shorts in winter without judgement. Lucy Letby is innocent. All views my own.

Joined March 2026
Alex Cutter retweeted
The entire story of the Lucy Letby catastrophe in a dozen tweets. 1. Beginning June 2015, Chester hospital’s Neonatal unit experienced a spike in admissions and of particularly vulnerable babies. The situation was beyond its ability to cope.
3
40
1
96
3,208
In this video on the Lucy Letby case, I conclude my examination of the promotional film made by Cheshire Police on Operation Hummingbird. Lucy Letby: Cheshire Police Ramp Up The Incompetence: youtube.com/watch?v=yEdFnW0K… #LucyLetby #LucyLetbyInnocent
5
20
1
53
1,600
Alex Cutter retweeted
🚨 Dr. Stephen Brearey, the lead neonatal consultant at the Countess of Chester Hospital said he should have gone to police sooner about Lucy Letby. He didn't because there was no crime until the clinical negligence was flipped into let's frame Lucy Letby as a murderer.
12
20
95
2,169
In this video, I examine the recent BBC Radio 4 interview of Dr. Stephen Brearey, and the commentary of the Today programme on the Lucy Letby case. Lucy Letby: NEW Dr Brearey BBC Radio 4 Interview Analysis: youtube.com/watch?v=wY3tqc0Z… #LucyLetby #LucyLetbyInnocent
6
34
2
81
3,024
In this video on Lucy Letby, I begin assessing some new notes on the case which have been passed to me by a microbiologist. I delve into the records at the Countess of Chester Hospital and the trial of Lucy Letby, examining whether the hospital conducted adequate testing and if the court ever heard about this. Lucy Letby: New Microbiologist Speaks Out youtube.com/watch?v=5jogzsKV… #LucyLetby #LucyLetbyInnocent
2
15
52
1,029
Alex Cutter retweeted
considering even the prosecution own expert witness prof Owen Arthurs says it should be picked up post-mortem. Not even 1 single case picked up by all 3 pathologists? They are all incompetent and need to be FIRED?
1
3
26
331
Alex Cutter retweeted
Explain to me please. Thirlwall report has NO CRITICISM of pathologists Shukla, Kokai, and McPartland for failing to diagnose air embolism in ANY Lucy Letby cases, when both Ravi Jayaram AND Dewi Evans who did not even perform post mortem apparently BOTH able to diagnose it...
9
17
3
83
3,214
No joke! Caroline Cheetham was secretly working as a police publicist while pretending to be a neutral journalist covering the Lucy Letby trial There is no universe in which a journalist covering a trial should be secretly getting paid by the police force whose case is on trial
3
34
4
151
6,820
Replying to @lizhull
Is your co-host, Caroline Cheetham, ever going to address the secret publicity payments she took from Cheshire police, in the middle of Lucy Letby's trial, which the two of you did a podcast on (without acknowledging the secret police payments)? Or nah? xitter.cf/LucyLetbyTrials/status…
Periodic reminder that Caroline Cheetham, the co-host of the Daily Mail's podcast about Lucy Letby, took secret payments from Cheshire police while the trial was ongoing. She never disclosed this to the public, or to her bosses at the Daily Mail. telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05…
6
37
2
154
3,124
Alex Cutter retweeted
'Anyone who knows anything about alleged miscarriages of justice knows that they do not just go away because the existing system or prevailing forms of power say that they should' Dr Michael Naughton of @EmpowerInnocent #CCRCNotFitForPurpose
12
26
524
A new interview that I have recorded with DataLawOnline has gone live today. They previously interviewed Lucy Letby's barrister Mark McDonald. You can see this interview here: youtube.com/watch?v=cdMaq09u… #LucyLetby #LucyLetbyInnocent
2
21
2
59
2,938
In this video, Dr. Martyn Pitman and Dr. Gordon Caldwell discuss the prosecution theory of air embolism, explaining why it is untenable. Lucy Letby: Leading Doctors Destroy Prosecution Theory: youtube.com/watch?v=BRG-WnBq… #LucyLetby #LucyLetbyInnocent
1
36
2
77
2,366
"here's proof from the Thirlwall Inquiry that #LucyLetby is guilty as hell" - the Inquiry that was conducted on the assumption that her guilt could not be questioned? The writer needs education in basic logic, quite apart from law and science
1
9
277
Alex Cutter retweeted
For the last 14 years I listened to people calling me guilty. For the last year I listened to people saying I was not exonerated and we won on a technicality. Well Friday changed that. The case in law we were subjected to was so egregious it could not even withstand a guilty plea
25
65
5
261
14,783
Alex Cutter retweeted
A curious thing - some Brits seem to believe criminal courts make no mistakes EXCEPT when an appeal is successful and a miscarriage of justice thus exposed. They also seem to believe they have a God-given right to state this publicly. I wonder how the courts will treat them.
Replying to @ACLMoss
Problem is, nothing on the Internet is gone forever..
9
1
64
1,244
Alex Cutter retweeted
Here is another person who has no idea of the import of the decision to set aside a plea of guilty. I sat in that appeal and the bench agreed the case in law (my case too) lacked the necessary elements to constitute an offence and therefore the plea was redundant.
It’s got nothing to do with your legal status given I’ve stated you got off on a technicality. Legally you’re not guilty. If the judge hadn’t made an error there was “ample evidence” that could have led to a guilty verdict.
10
6
69
2,299
Alex Cutter retweeted
I will DM you to get your contact details so my legal team can contact you.
4
1
2
40
1,740
Alex Cutter retweeted
Prior to the decision of the CACD on Friday you might have had a point. They decided that a conviction of a guilty plea guilty on an identical indictment was not safe. Why was that? Because they recognised the case we faced lacked the elements to make it criminal.
2
3
46
989
Alex Cutter retweeted
Replying to @NickBarberX
Would you, Nick, and Dewi Evans, be prepared to hold a private three way conversation about statistical issues in this case? I’m happy to come to London to meet you both.
3
17
157