David Davison retweeted
this is just factually untrue and a spit in the face of all the people who know folks who never recovered from COVID
David Davison retweeted
i would like to live in a society where it would be unthinkable - utterly inconceivable - for people to go to work/ school while sick
David Davison retweeted
Going from a socialist to a Republican in a handful of years because of Israel is crazy, do you realize how Islamophobic you have to be to do that lol
I admire Democrats making this choice.
I’m supporting Rogers because he is not an extremist. As a father, public safety matters to me. I don’t trust Abdul El-Sayed, but I trust Mike Rogers on the issues that matter most.
Mike Rogers has shown he’s willing and ready to work with local Democrats on achievable bread-and-butter issues to improve life for Michiganders. I respect that.
David Davison retweeted
At a certain point we have to just be honest and say that if you are a single-issue pro-genocide voter (to the extent you will even sacrifice American democracy itself towards that end!), you do belong in the GOP. This is just rational sorting, and unavoidable ultimately.
David Davison retweeted
There’s much about this that’s false but on the issue of “terrorism” it’s worth highlighting again that in the past 30 years Israel had killed more American civilians than Hezbollah and Iran combined and it’s not particularly close.
David Davison retweeted
Sally Rooney is an experimental novelist, you guys are just misogynists
If you aren’t capable of telling the difference, you have no right talking about how they’re the same. I can’t express how little I esteem someone’s taste if they can confuse the two writing skills here.
Rooney is one of the most subtle, affect-sensitive writers in the language.
These two passages depict the same subject matter in an identical style.
One is from Fifty Shades of Grey. The other is from Sally Rooney’s Normal People.
I bet you can't even tell which is which.
If we have the sensibility to dismiss one as a trashy romance novel, then why do we continue to celebrate the other as serious literature?
(The Rooney passage, for one, is almost inarticulably sad: the charged missed connection of lovers who are seeking contradictory forms of self-creation via sex. The other has almost nothing besides plot going on. A “critic” thinking they’re the same is so embarrassing it hurts.)
David Davison retweeted
It is even worse than this. Biden dropped the Covid plan he ran on, put a hedge fund manager in charge, and ignored medical recommendations. This led to hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths, turning Omicron into a mass disabling event, and making Covid the number one chronic disease in children.
David Davison retweeted
The truth remains that most academics, includ some disabled faculty, hate disabled ppl, seeing them as part of unwashed masses who should be excluded from higher education and who, by being “allowed” into higher ed, make everyone else’s experiences and working conditions worse.
David Davison retweeted
I really do think large portions of the world only ever learned to motivate themselves using shame and fear and are terrified that self-love might actually be a better tool they don't know how to access so when they try they fall into disarray and return to shame as motivation.
David Davison retweeted
I cannot imagine the horror of going to your execution, experiencing severe pain, and then waking up and finding out you lived and that you have to go to your execution again. Hard to imagine what it means for something to be cruel and unusual if that isn’t it.
David Davison retweeted
wtf do you mean "from walmart.ca" who is funding these things whats going on
David Davison retweeted
wow an american who thinks that treaty obligations should be violated who could have possibly predicted this
Nearly every discourse we have online falls apart if you stop believing in a unified individual self.
Inside every person, there are parts that have done good things and parts that have done bad things, all in blocs—but there is no unified "person" there to subsume moral agency.
Does a system accrue moral responsibility? Yeah, probably: since for harm to be done outside, usually internal parts must also fail to intervene. But without the soul as a moral bank account, processing debits and credits, that responsibility gets complex fast.


























