lno1pg98w6tvd33kchmpwf43ugznq2wnnj5hcnf8rtufy6608lkr0ga2s7672wpjnpzl9lrkz3h69q

UK
Joined March 2009
A new release candidate of Bitcoin Core, v32.0rc4, is available for testing. This is a new major release, and follows v31.1. Work-in-progress release notes are here: github.com/bitcoin-core/bitc… Binaries are available here: bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-…
12
22
1
83
7,337
32.0rc2 testing binaries are now available bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-… Includes the new getopenrpcinfo RPC (shoutout @willcl_ark). It returns a machine-readable OpenRPC spec of the entire RPC API, useful for generating client code and docs or diffing between releases.
2
12
31
1,119
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
KYC = kill your customer
Did you get an email from @Revolut mentioning that your data has been leaked? If so my condolences and ... well the trove of data in this case seems quite very bad.
19
175
10
1,263
60,719
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
By default, fork.observer now shows the block pools are mining on. Thanks you @boerst for providing the stratum.work data!
7
19
1
95
3,113
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
Please do not direct your agent to burn down issues on someone else's open source project. Reviewing your "contribution" is actually more work for a maintainer than it is for them to direct their own agent to fix the same bug. So you are actually creating work, not helping.
27
37
4
553
28,332
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
TIL: this block by an Ocean miner was the first block in >6 years that didn't claim the full subsidy+fees reducing supply by 0.00342 BTC. Looks like the miner forgot about the 171x 2000sat in fees. mainnet.observer/charts/bloc…
10
7
4
62
15,767
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
You can now minimize the number of nixpkgs you pull into the multiverse. Best news is that it doesn't need a solver like z3, the algorithm is simple! You can now access every version ever using the smallest possible nixpkgs set. fzakaria.com/2026/08/17/nixp…
1
4
20
926
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
Replying to @C4R3Bear
That is correct - have verified code paths for all versions of firmware that dice rolls are mixed in via hash to seed. 99+ rolls is good.
6
13
8
72
6,300
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
2 and 1/2 years, 5 PR takes, 1284 review comments, 1 protocol change and countless force-pushes and CI runs later, we made it to the finish line and the Silent Payments (BIP-352) module has finally landed in libsecp256k1! 🤫🎉 #1471 → #1519 → #1698 → #1765 🏁✅(→ #1792 🏷️⛔)
7
34
5
151
26,813
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
I submitted a Bitcoin Core pull request implementing the BIP 54 soft fork (Consensus Cleanup), without mainnet activation. The Consensus Cleanup was first proposed in 2019. Since work on it resumed in late 2023, it slowly matured into a robust proposal addressing several long-standing vulnerabilities and quirks in Bitcoin's consensus protocol. Along the way it gathered support from a broad range of Bitcoin developers and technically minded Bitcoin enthusiasts, and this milestone marks a natural point for the broader community to start discussing a possible future activation. I strongly believe Bitcoin would benefit from adopting this soft fork as a straightforward measure to mitigate some long-term risks, and i hope Bitcoin users come to the same conclusion. I also want to emphasize that while BIP 54 fixes real security vulnerabilities, i do not believe those to be immediate existential threats to the network. There is no rush, and we can afford time for everyone to carefully consider the proposal.
20
63
10
248
19,159
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
Thanks to all the work done by @fjahr and pinheadz, libevent is no-longer a dependency of Bitcoin Core, This means a minimal bitcoind, now only has a single, header only, external dependency; which is Boost MultiIndex. Work is ongoing to replace this too.
7
28
3
122
11,908
Quick update. GitHub has decided our open-source project has been permanently banned with no explanation and no option to appeal, pointing to a ToS that clearly does not cover anything we’ve ever done. I guess it’s time for Bitcoin projects to leave @github.
We’ve had a few similar cases recently. Worse, our org currently has no CI because GitHub wrongly flagged a contributor (not admin/maintainer, just someone new who opened a few PRs). We’ve escalated it through corporate account managers and still basically nothing.
43
80
27
433
96,844
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
What's better than #nix #nixos #nixpkgs ? How about any derivation from #guix inside of Nix ! This was an idea I have had for a while. Who wants to make a MetaPkgs ? fzakaria.com/2026/06/05/the-…
1
4
12
608
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
I never thought this would be possible, but: I built a bitcoind binary with Nix that is bit-by-bit identical to the Bitcoin Core v31.0 Guix-built release binary for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Big win for reproducible builds across different toolchains. b10c.me/projects/027-bitcoin…
18
50
5
246
35,694
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
Fully-static, reproducible, release binaries for Bitcoin Core, have been a long-time goal of mine, and we are getting are closer to making them a reality. I've produced test binaries from a PR of mine (#25573), and am looking for feedback, questions, and hopefully testing on various systems or obscure platforms.
7
22
2
104
12,959
added some ASN lookups to the data from xitter.cf/willcl_ark/status/2037… hover to see some AS details willcl-ark.github.io/dnsseed…
Node count ≠ independent support. Data from my Bitcoin crawler shows that of 3,312 “good” (listening + connectable) BIP110 nodes, 3,058 are concentrated within just 12 /16 IP ranges (~255 per range), suggesting possible single-operator control. Excluding them leaves 254 (listening + connectable) BIP110 nodes. For comparison, applying the same method flags 1 Bitcoin Core node and 0 Bitcoin Knots nodes. willcl-ark.github.io/dnsseed…
1
4
21
1,605
Node count ≠ independent support. Data from my Bitcoin crawler shows that of 3,312 “good” (listening + connectable) BIP110 nodes, 3,058 are concentrated within just 12 /16 IP ranges (~255 per range), suggesting possible single-operator control. Excluding them leaves 254 (listening + connectable) BIP110 nodes. For comparison, applying the same method flags 1 Bitcoin Core node and 0 Bitcoin Knots nodes. willcl-ark.github.io/dnsseed…
33
35
20
152
30,013
Updated the charts to use /24 for sybil "detection", instead of /16. Also just noting here, the figures in OP (and all "sybil" charts) exclude Tor nodes.
1
11
940
wi͛llcl-ark retweeted
The Bitcoin Block Arrival Time dataset has a website now. bitcoin-data.github.io/block… Feel free to contribute timestamps you might have from running node or some other service that has accurate block arrival times.
10
1
37
1,752