Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83) header
Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83) profile picture

Habs. Patriots. Sports Fan. Big Brother is a guilty pleasure. Traveller (insta @whiff83). Business Dev Officer. Master of Economic Dev Candidate @uwaterloo.

Grand Falls-Windsor, NL, CAN
Joined October 2009
Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)Photo by Mark Whiffen (@Whiff83)
Refs steal another point there.
1
77
So, what you’re saying is that the media will be biased, twist the truth, misrepresent you, and selectively present information, all in an effort to shape public opinion against you and advance their own agenda? That’s quite a wild admission.
1
1
135
According to the Left, anyone that isn’t them is a danger to democracy. The irony of the virtuous Left…
55
Mark Whiffen retweeted
“The federal gov’t spent $19B on external consultants last year, despite a promise to cut back on its use of outside contractors… In last week’s budget… [it] said it had already taken steps to reduce spending on external management and other consulting services by 20%…”🤔
4
9
478
Mark Whiffen retweeted
“[In] September… Canadian residents made approximately 1.9 million return trips from the U.S. by air & automobile, up 6.8% from September 2025. It was the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year growth. ‘We need to remember the majority of snowbirds still go to the U.S.’…”🤔
8
40
3
136
2,402
But notice how flat the curves are! This is the game: every budget or update projects spending to flatline in out years. And every budget or update, the whole curve gets shifted upwards $10 or $20 billion.
Budget 2026 projects $108B more in expenses for 2026/27 than the 2021 Fall Update did. Greater spending discipline, even reducing overruns by two-thirds, would have eliminated the deficit.
22
10
1
62
9,794
PM @MarkJCarney’s budget sends money to the ridings of two MPs who crossed the floor to the Liberals, cash a pollster says could soften the backlash against them. The Toronto Star reports the budget also targets seats the Liberals barely won or narrowly lost. 🧵👇 (1/7)
48
109
16
307
22,742
Mark Whiffen retweeted
Pure joy in Cleveland!
91
226
22
4,722
32,636,376
Mark Whiffen retweeted
This chart explains a lot about Ottawa’s polling and priorities. Import a tax base to keep the rich babies happy.
This is one of the best graphs I've seen in a long time. It shows how much each Canadian receives from Ottawa, based on their age. I wish someone could create this graph for 1965, and show the demographic shift that has occurred in the last 60 years. 1/
24
30
2
277
12,193
Mark Whiffen retweeted
One of the most depressing parts was watching Bill Morneau, who wrote a book about the myth of Canada’s retirement crisis, being trotted out to defend the reversal
Reminder that Canada under the Harper government *did* raise the OAS eligibility age. Had Trudeau not reversed this courageous reform, we would be spending $11 billion less on OAS by 2029, according to the PBO. When OAS was created in 1952, the benefit began at age 70. Life expectancy was 68, and the ratio of workers to retirees was 8 to 1. Eligibility is now at 65, with life expectancy at 81, and the ratio of workers to retirees down to 3 to 1. The current system represents a massive, unjust intergenerational transfer of wealth which is obviously unsustainable.
37
18
1
311
24,764
Expert level: gaslighting Last year only "beat" his own bad forecast, thanks to surprise revenue from you. Next year: $62B+, and over $50B till 2030. The windfall is already spent. Debt interest > health care next year. Interest hits $85B+ by 2030. Those things are in the budget too.
16
92
1
548
8,708
New job numbers yesterday. The grocery bill doesn’t wait for the job market to recover. From January to October 2026, the U.S. added 861,000 payroll jobs while Canada had 45,900 fewer people employed.
93
497
66
1,409
49,999
Mark Whiffen retweeted
A sobering fact that is ignored by the Bank of Canada and the Economic Elites of Canada. The delusion in Canada needs to stop! The has Canada lagged the United States in population-adjusted employment growth from 2019 to 2024. Canada relied much more heavily on government-sector hiring, while private-sector employment failed to keep pace with its growing working-age population. Sure let’s hike rates.
Canada added no private sector jobs from 2019 to 2024 — U.S. did the exact opposite nationalpost.com/news/canada…
25
139
5
559
16,212
"We hear plenty about how many Canadians the federal government is helping. I long for the day when it can brag about how many Canadians no longer need its financial support."
Cheques from the federal budget help Canadians afford today’s grocery bill. A more productive food system makes tomorrow’s bill easier to manage. Link to full article: agrifoodanalyticslab.substac…
103
450
25
2,050
21,552
The next political wedge is going to be generational.
Public spending in Canada by age. When Ottawa looks for savings, it reviews the public service and operations. Most of that isn't on this chart. The elephant in the room is the bulge after 65: health care (red) and OAS/GIS (blue).
3
291
Mark Whiffen retweeted
Public spending in Canada by age. When Ottawa looks for savings, it reviews the public service and operations. Most of that isn't on this chart. The elephant in the room is the bulge after 65: health care (red) and OAS/GIS (blue).
Reminder that Canada under the Harper government *did* raise the OAS eligibility age. Had Trudeau not reversed this courageous reform, we would be spending $11 billion less on OAS by 2029, according to the PBO. When OAS was created in 1952, the benefit began at age 70. Life expectancy was 68, and the ratio of workers to retirees was 8 to 1. Eligibility is now at 65, with life expectancy at 81, and the ratio of workers to retirees down to 3 to 1. The current system represents a massive, unjust intergenerational transfer of wealth which is obviously unsustainable.
36
63
19
421
99,578
Mark Whiffen retweeted
The entirety of GST revenue the federal government will collect this year ($51.5b) PLUS the entirety of EI premiums they’ll collect this year ($34.3b) together aren’t enough to cover the near $90b cost of OAS this year. This problem will only get worse as the population ages.
Budget 2026 in one graph
38
22
3
203
9,432
Mark Whiffen retweeted
Canada’s dirty little secret
CBC’s At Issue buried the real budget criticism in the YouTube bonus In the online-only extra, Andrew Coyne finally said it plainly: “Moving in the wrong direction is they are going to increase and indeed entrench subsidies to the news media to our business. I thought this was a bad idea when they first introduced it… it was going to be this temporary emergency stopgap… Well, once we got our hooks into the public taxpayer, you’ll never get us off it. So in fact, they’re increasing the amount of and they’re going to make it pretty much permanent. And they’ve expanded it beyond just the newspaper business now into audio visual. This is not good for the future of the news business in this country.” The response? An immediate pivot from Rosie to “Your letter stamps are going up to $2… Canada Post isn’t doing well. 7% escalator after. Oh, dear.” A panelist on the public broadcaster admits the temporary media bailout is now permanent and expanding, and the room answers with postage rates. That is the entire engagement with the most obvious conflict of interest in the budget @acoyne @RosieBarton @althiaraj
11
47
2
189
16,708
Reminder that Canada under the Harper government *did* raise the OAS eligibility age. Had Trudeau not reversed this courageous reform, we would be spending $11 billion less on OAS by 2029, according to the PBO. When OAS was created in 1952, the benefit began at age 70. Life expectancy was 68, and the ratio of workers to retirees was 8 to 1. Eligibility is now at 65, with life expectancy at 81, and the ratio of workers to retirees down to 3 to 1. The current system represents a massive, unjust intergenerational transfer of wealth which is obviously unsustainable.
That OAS number is insane. While most developed nations have raised, or plan to raise, the retirement age, Canada leaves it at 65 for purely political reasons.
192
241
54
1,551
206,471