Ile-de-France, France
Joined December 2022
Demo of my mythological cultivation game: 30m using Astra6 + Gemini (for HUD) and TripoAI for 3D char gene. It took just a 1prompt with 1 ref image—with GPT and Gem collab—to complete the project after two 5h cycles on GPT+. #GPT6Astra #Blender #AI #indiegame #vibegame #tripoAI
88
Demo of my mythological cultivation game: 30m using Astra6 + Gemini (for HUD) and TripoAI for 3D char gene. It took just a 1prompt with 1 ref image—with GPT and Gem collab—to complete the project after two 5h cycles on GPT+. #GPT6Astra #Blender #AI #indiegame #vibegame #tripoAI
98
Anh Nguyen retweeted
They called it the "American Dream" and exported it to every corner of the earth. The dream: work hard, play by the rules, and you will succeed. Your success will be proportional to your effort. Your failure will be proportional to your inadequacy. The system is fair. The system is open. The system rewards merit. This dream required a specific kind of blindness to function. It required not seeing that the rules were written by the people who already had everything. It required not seeing that the "level playing field" of American capitalism was built on stolen land, built by enslaved labor, maintained by the systematic exclusion of entire populations from the wealth they generated. It required not seeing that the prosperity Americans enjoyed throughout the twentieth century was directly connected to the extraction of resources and labor from the rest of the world, enforced by the military power and financial architecture of empire. It required not seeing that when poor countries tried to write their own rules, tried to nationalize their resources, tried to redistribute land, tried to build welfare states that served their own populations rather than American investors, those attempts were systematically destroyed. The dream was real for enough people, enough of the time, to function as proof of concept. But the dream was also a management tool. It told working Americans that their interests were aligned with the wealthy Americans who owned the system. It told them that the enemy was not the domestic billionaire class but the foreign ideology that threatened the system in which they too might one day succeed. It turned solidarity with the poor of the world into a threat to be feared rather than a kinship to be claimed. The Vietnamese rice farmer who wanted land reform and the American factory worker who wanted a union were natural political allies. The empire's greatest domestic achievement was ensuring they never recognized each other. Instead, the factory worker was taught to see the rice farmer as the threat. And sent to kill him. And came home broken. And the man who sent him got a library named after him.
47
593
35
1,186
17,442
Anh Nguyen retweeted
The most honest thing ever said about the American War was said by a Vietnamese colonel to an American colonel after the war ended. The American colonel, Harry Summers, told his Vietnamese counterpart: "You know, you never defeated us on the battlefield." The Vietnamese colonel, Nguyễn Đôn Tự, thought about it and replied: "That may be so. But it is also irrelevant." That exchange contains the entire war. The Americans won battles. They won firefights. They had superior firepower in almost every conventional engagement. By their own metrics, body counts, kill ratios, territory controlled, they were often "winning." And they lost the war. Because wars are not won by body counts. Wars are not won by kill ratios. Wars are not won by the number of bombs dropped or the cost of the weapons deployed or the technological sophistication of the killing machinery. Wars, especially wars of occupation, wars of colonial imposition, wars fought against people defending their own land, are won by will. And on the question of will, there was never a contest. The Vietnamese people had been resisting foreign occupation for two thousand years before America arrived. Fighting was not a policy position. It was a cultural inheritance. A collective understanding of who they were and what they would do when someone came to tell them how to live. America arrived with the most powerful military in human history and a firm belief that sufficient firepower could substitute for legitimacy. It cannot. It never could. It never will. Irrelevant. That one word, from a Vietnamese colonel to his American counterpart, is the entire lesson.
155
1,382
63
4,655
310,910
Anh Nguyen retweeted
Your "respect" is hollow. You replaced Westmoreland's biological racism with geopolitical infantilization. Different packaging. Same refusal to admit that an Asian nation defeated a Western superpower on its own terms. To suggest millions of Vietnamese endured napalm, Agent Orange, and carpet-bombing because a "despot" told them to is imperial arrogance in its purest form. We were not fighting for an ideology. We were expelling a foreign invader. America was not fighting despots. It was fighting the immune system of a nation. And it lost. Yes. The Soviets sent weapons and aid. Yes, China sent anti-aircraft and logistical support. But the men and women in the tunnels, the people who broke Westmoreland's army psychologically, were Vietnamese. America brought half a million troops, total air and naval supremacy, allies from South Korea to Australia, and dropped more bombs than all of World War II combined. And still it left by helicopter from a rooftop. Do not blame China for American military humiliation. Vietnam's post-war poverty was not caused by socialism. Vietnam was physically obliterated by American explosives, its agriculture poisoned with millions of gallons of Agent Orange, and then strangled by a vindictive, two-decade U.S. trade embargo meant to starve it for winning. Vietnam thrives today not because it "broke free" of its allies, but because it survived an American-made apocalypse and rebuilt from the ashes. You can try to rewrite history to soothe the American ego. The scoreboard does not change. The Vietnamese fought. The Vietnamese won. You just can't let that sentence stand alone.
Replying to @nxt888
I have mad respect for the Vietnamese, and have not a single good thing to say about Westmoreland, but sorry the Vietnamese were driven by despots who were every bit as rotten as the american ones, and yes people had bravery and being free is a great goal, but they had 350K Chinese troops in country, and the Russians came in and spawned a generation of absolute economic destruction. It's doing well now because it broke free of them. Not because it defeated Westmoreland.
55
383
19
1,435
42,416
Anh Nguyen retweeted
General William Westmoreland, the American commander in Vietnam, said that Asians do not value human life the way Westerners do. He said this to explain why Vietnamese soldiers kept fighting despite losses that would have broken Western armies. He did not say: perhaps they are fighting for something worth dying for. He did not say: perhaps our intelligence about their will to fight was wrong. He did not say: perhaps we have fundamentally misunderstood this enemy. He said: they don't value life. This is what happens when an army built on the premise of its own civilizational superiority meets a people who simply refuse to accept that premise. The army cannot update its model. It cannot say "we were wrong about who these people are." So it invents a theory where the enemy's resistance is not a sign of strength but a sign of deficiency. They keep fighting because life is cheap to them. Not because their cause is just. Not because they are brave. Because they are less than us. Westmoreland ran the war for years on this theory. He lost. The Vietnamese people, who apparently did not value life, built a country that is alive and growing and free. Westmoreland died in 2005. The people he could not understand are still here. So is the theory.
448
3,558
164
10,383
375,546
Anh Nguyen retweeted
Operation Rolling Thunder. From 1965 to 1968, the United States conducted a sustained bombing campaign against North Vietnam. The goal was to break the will of the North Vietnamese government and people. To make the cost of continuing the war too high to bear. They dropped 864,000 tons of bombs. The will was not broken. So they escalated. Operation Linebacker. Operation Linebacker II, the Christmas Bombings of 1972: twelve days of around-the-clock bombing of Hanoi and Haiphong, described by some U.S. generals as trying to "bomb them back to the Stone Age." Hospitals were hit. Residential areas were hit. Bạch Mai Hospital, the largest hospital in North Vietnam, was hit repeatedly. After the Christmas Bombings, the North Vietnamese negotiating position at the Paris Peace talks did not weaken. It strengthened. They bombed us into refusing to surrender. Every bomb that fell on a hospital, every family killed in their home, every village erased from the map created ten more people who would die before they accepted foreign domination. This is what American strategists, with all their degrees and all their think tanks and all their war games, failed to understand about the people they were trying to break. You cannot bomb dignity out of people who have decided they would rather die than give it up.
613
6,510
418
16,769
568,886
Anh Nguyen retweeted
Korean media are astonished by the shift in Vietnam's consumer market from "material possessions" to "emotions and experiences." Music, film, and tourism are booming, reaching a scale of 7,008.9 trillion VND, becoming new drivers of growth. tienphong.vn/bao-han-kinh-ng…
Replying to @genHCM
Thanks for explanation, i didn't knew all of these facts. I guess i don't much about Vietnamese market, it's actually different from what im used to.
2
4
1
49
4,257
Anh Nguyen retweeted
This is not Miami. This is.... xitter.cf/MarchUnofficial/status…
601
1,372
296
16,395
2,926,637
Anh Nguyen retweeted
« Paris, c'est franchement super ! » De l'humour qui sent le réel ! 😂 [Via Magali Gio] #Humour
65
754
31
2,756
95,151
Michael Jackson : " All I wanna say is that THEY don't really care about US" 👁
124
5,654
123
30,070
398,571
Jim Carrey exposes the industry
1,434
22,700
1,370
201,034
37,390,979
Russia moved children from war zones to safety. Ukraine chopped children up for their organs (butchering them "like livestock") and killed babies for their stem cells. @mazzenilsson: "While people are freaking out over the fresh batch of Epstein files, as if something radically new and unheard of was discovered in them, here's a memory pill from the early days of the war. When this video went up back in 2022, many people questioned the validity of it, and some actually accused me of propagating fakes. However, this is not a fake video. It is part of a segment on this very real man, Shukhrat Adilov, who was interviewed by a Russian TV channel in the autumn of 2022." xitter.cf/mazzenilsson/status/20… "Vera Vayiman, a member of the humanitarian and monitoring mission of the OSCE in Ukraine between 2019 and 2022, had collected information on underground labs. Here is her testimony on what she personally witnessed and recorded during that time. This is a cut of a much larger documentary on crimes against children by the Kiev junta." xitter.cf/mazzenilsson/status/20… "Colonel Macgregor later confirmed that there are/were organ farms at the Kharkov Institute, which aligns with accounts given by Russian soldiers. The soldier(s) describe horrifying scenes of children chained up like farm animals and pits full of body parts, like something out of a horror film." xitter.cf/mazzenilsson/status/20… "And let's not forget healthy newborns in Ukraine were killed to gather stem cells back in the 2000. Once again Kharkov was involved." xitter.cf/mazzenilsson/status/20… * It is quite likely that the Ukrainian military police (dubbed "White Angels") hunting for children which Christelle Néant & I reported on in April 2023 (with many more reports coming out subsequently) were doing so not only for pedophile networks but also organ theft and trafficking. t.me/Reality_Theories/12549
For the last three years, Ukraine and concerted legacy media campaigns have been screaming that Russia has abducted, or forcibly displaced, thousands of Ukrainian children – even up to 1.5 million! The accusations resurged in December, with a UN General Assembly vote on a draft resolution on the return of Ukrainian children. During the meeting, Ukraine’s Deputy Foreign Minister Mariana Betsa once again pushed claims that “at least 20,000 Ukrainian children have been deported to Russia,” in spite of the fact that months prior, during the June Istanbul talks, the Ukrainian side finally provided a list of the children it accuses Russia of abducting: 339 children, surprisingly far fewer than the number alleged for years. The absence of over 19,500 on the list indeed leads to many questions, mainly: is Ukraine lying again? Recall that in 2022, the accusations by the (now former) Ukrainian ombudswoman, Lyudmila Denisova, about “sexual atrocities” allegedly committed by Russian soldiers, were revealed to be lies and propaganda. So much so that Denisova was sacked. But before her dismissal, legacy media and the UN all backed the lies. Some recent accusations are that children were being sent to labor camps in Russia – “165 re-education camps where Ukrainian children are militarized and Russified” – or even of being sent to North Korea, as Katerina Rashevskaya of the Ukrainian Regional Center for Human Rights told the US Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs on December 3. The footnotes of the claims made by Rashevskaya, instead of a source for the information, say “The Regional Human Rights Center can provide information upon request.” In other words, her sources are “trust me, bro.” Regarding the North Korean camp in question, if two Russian teens were sent there, they’d potentially be made to enjoy water slides, basketball and volleyball courts, an arcade room, a rock climbing wall, art and performance halls, an archery range, a private beach, and hikes in the mountains. Regarding the list of 339 children Ukraine says were abducted by Russia, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova remarked, “30 percent of the names on the list could not be verified, as most of those children were never in Russia, are now adults, or have already returned to their families. As for the Ukrainian children who are actually in our country, they are under state care in appropriate institutions. They are safe now; in many cases, their evacuation from combat zones saved their lives. Local children’s rights commissioners are now working to reunite them with their relatives.” Just as legacy media has whitewashed the eight years of Ukraine’s war against Donbass civilians prior to Russia commencing its military operation in 2022, including the Ukrainian shelling which killed 250 children starting in 2014, media likewise ignore the children Russia says are missing. During the talks in Istanbul, Zakharova noted, “the Russian side presented Ukraine with a list of 20 Russian children who are either currently in Ukraine or relocated from Ukraine to Western Europe, including to countries that endorsed this very statement. Now, the burden falls on these states to provide Russia with a substantive response regarding our 'list of 20.'” Over 500 Ukrainian orphans abused in Türkiye Recently, Donbass-based journalist Christelle Néant wrote about a report published on a pro-Ukrainian website which broke the story of 510 Ukrainian children who had been evacuated by a Ukrainian oligarch in 2022 from Dnepropetrovsk to Türkiye, where the benevolent foundation which brought them there allegedly allowed its staff to beat the children, sexually assault them, and deny them food if they refused to perform on camera to raise funds for their lodging. These are just some of the reported violations of the orphans’ rights. The details of the report show that the children suffered physically and psychologically. Additionally, two underage teens were impregnated by staff at the hotel they stayed in, with educators allegedly aware of the interactions. According to Néant, the orphanage director’s response to the fact of one of the teens in her care becoming pregnant was to blame the girl: “This young girl comes from an asocial family. Well, this way of life is already inscribed in every cell, in the blood of these children.” “In almost 10 years of work in Donbass,” Néant wrote, “I have conducted or filmed many humanitarian missions to orphanages in the region. And never ever have I heard a director make such vile remarks about one of the children in her care. Even the most difficult and recalcitrant were cared for with pedagogy, love, and patience.” Ukraine hunting down children In April 2023, Christelle Néant and I interviewed Artyomovsk civilians who had recently been rescued by Russian soldiers. In addition to being deliberately shelled by Ukrainian forces who knew they were sheltering in the basement of a residential building, the civilians we spoke to told us about Ukrainian military police hunting for children. The evacuees told us some of these police went by the name ‘White Angels’, and were taking children away without their consent or that of their parents. Around that time, more reports came out about these abductions or attempted abductions, including an 11-year-old girl who spoke of how White Angels, who introduced themselves as military police, came to the basement she was sheltering in with a photo of her, looking for her, and saying they needed to take her away, because “Russia killed her mother.” According to the girl, her mother was alive and with her. Reports of these abductions also emerged in Avdeyevka, Kupyansk, Slavyansk, Chasov Yar and Konstantinovka, as well as in Ukrainsk and Zhelannoye. Néant wrote of a July 2023 conference on Ukraine’s crimes against the Donbass children, in which Liliya and her daughter Kira from Schastye, in the Lugansk People’s Republic, spoke. They gave evidence of how, “at the start of the special military operation (when Ukraine controlled Schastye), around ten children were taken from a school in Schastye to western Ukraine by the headmistress of the school, on orders from Kiev, without informing their parents.” The children were even forbidden to call their parents, Néant wrote, “But Kira knew her mother’s telephone number by heart and managed to call her to let her know that they were in Lviv and then Khoust. Thanks to Liliya’s determination to find her daughter, we discovered how Kiev ‘exports’ the children it abducts.” Ukraine had forged a new “original” birth certificate for Kira. The girl said she and the other children were to be sent to Poland. Former SBU officer Vasily Prozorov spoke at the same conference, where he explained, according to Néant, “that one of his investigations had revealed that some of the children abducted by Ukraine are sent to pedophile networks in Great Britain, via a whole network of Ukrainian and British officials or former officials who work together. On the British side, members of MI6 and the Foreign Office are involved.” Prozorov, she wrote, spoke of “another of his investigations on organizations registered in EU countries involved in ‘exporting’ children from Ukraine under the pretext of providing them with shelter. These organizations take unaccompanied Ukrainian children out of Ukraine. What happens to them afterwards is unknown.” Evacuees from Kherson reject ‘abduction’ claims In November 2022, in the southern Russian seaside city Anapa, I met numerous people displaced from Kherson who were being lodged in hotels and apartments in the city. The first site I visited was a few minutes by taxi outside of the city, one of many hotels along the coast. The hotel director showing me around said they don’t call them refugees, “we call them guests of the building,” and spoke affectionately of them, how grateful they were to be there, far from any shelling. Just under 500 refugees had been living there since October, she told me. No guards monitored the entrance/exit; the refugees walked around tidy grounds. But in any case, I asked about their freedom of movement, or lack thereof. “They move freely, of course. We don’t prohibit them from going out. Many aren’t here now because they’re in town, looking for jobs, getting documents. Children are at school.” With my hired translator, I spoke with two Kherson women, a young mother and her own mother, to hear their stories. “We were living with explosions at night, it was very scary, not only for myself, but for my children and for my grandchildren,” the older woman said. “When you go to bed, you don’t know if you will get out of bed in the morning. We were forced to leave.” I asked who was shelling them. “Word of mouth transmits very clearly, and people around us spoke about it. We were bombed by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Russian soldiers protected us.” The younger woman said she used to speak with the Russian soldiers there. “They are friendly. We wanted to hug them, because we felt protected. They helped us, gave us humanitarian aid, brought it to the house.” Some minutes’ taxi ride away, I visited an apartment complex that could have served tourists in summer.  There, fifty buildings housed around 1,500 refugees who had also arrived in October, mostly from Kherson Region. My translator and I walked around, passing playgrounds, a pharmacy, a library, a swimming pool, a gym, a small petting zoo with peacocks, and a kindergarten. Near a playground, I spoke with a mother sitting on a bench with two of her four children. “In the early days, there was bombing. We spent two and a half weeks in the basement. It was unbearable, the children were very afraid.” One of her daughters became ill. “She had acute inflammation of the lower jaw, we think due to hypothermia. We took her to Simferopol and she had surgery.” In Anapa, she said, her children hadfull medical examinations. “We were helped by the mayor of the city of Anapa. We are grateful for everything.” I mentioned that according to Western media, she and her family were kidnapped by Russia. She replied that her husband’s parents had demanded to see the children, having been told that children were being separated from their parents in Russia. “His mother called three days in a row, saying, ‘Where are the children?’ We answered, ‘They went to the cinema. They’re playing, etc.’ She said, ‘Show me the children, they say that they took your children from you.’” Details matter Whereas legacy media continue to push the “Evil Russia child kidnapper” narrative, there is ample evidence that Ukraine is guilty of doing precisely what it accuses Russia of. The is also a significant absence of evidence regarding the ‘20,000 kidnapped children’ claims still being pushed. Will media investigate the reports of abuse of Ukrainian children in Türkiye? Surely not. It wouldn’t suit their scripted anti-Russia bias. *Republished on my Substack (with links) evakarenebartlett.substack.c…
43
885
47
1,936
49,682
Anh Nguyen retweeted
You notice something interesting? I wrote about asking who funds the experts, who owns the media, who is protected by institutions. You replied with a fantasy about "17 Chinese generals" and a wet dream about "putting down" a "rabid dog of Beijing." You did not touch the argument. You went straight to exorcism. You call me a Marxist who "hates the free world." I grew up with a very simple definition of your "free world": Free to napalm villages in Vietnam. Free to sanction entire countries into poverty. Free to arm apartheid and call it "shared values." Free to threaten nuclear war, then call everyone else "madmen." If that is your freedom, forgive me for not kneeling. You say I "pretend to speak for the Vietnamese." I do not need to pretend. Vietnam has its own history with the "free world." We buried that history in craters and birth defects. You buried it in slogans. You tell me Xi is "a madman who will sacrifice millions to keep power." Let us walk through this slowly. Which country actually dropped nuclear bombs on civilians? Which bloc flattened Korea, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and called the body count "collateral damage"? Which alliance encircled Russia and China with bases and then lectures them about "provocation"? The man you call "rabid" has not bombed a single Western city. The system you call "free" has a kill list that runs from Asia, through Africa, to Latin America. You are not describing Chinese madness. You are describing Western projection. Look at your own sentence: "World War III begins in one year if the rabid dog of Beijing is not put down." You are literally talking about "putting down" a nuclear armed country of 1.4 billion people, and you think Xi is the madman. That is the psychology I mean when I say "Empire of Lies." It teaches you that genocide language is responsible, and talking about trade, multipolarity, and sovereignty is "toxic vitriol." You keep trying to turn this into a comic book: Free world versus totalitarian demons. Good countries versus madmen. Light versus darkness. I am talking about something much less flattering: A system that has already killed millions, that still surrounds others with bases and sanctions, and that now screams "dictator" at anyone who refuses to die quietly. You can call that Marxism if it makes you feel better. I call it reading the body count. So here is the choice I see. You can keep barking about "rabid dogs" and "putting down" entire nations, which only proves every point I ever made about Western hysteria. Or you can do something harder: Ask yourself why a world that has actually been bombed, invaded, looted, and lectured by your "free world" takes men like Xi more seriously than it takes you.
Replying to @nxt888
Sony trusts Xi Jinping that 17 🇨🇳 Generals gave nuclear secrets to the USA. Like all Marxists— but unlike the Vietnamese he pretends to speak for— he simply hates the free world and prefers totalitarian dictators even if Islamic. The toxicity of his vitriol is only matched by the narrative he refuses to admit. Xi is a madman too who’ll sacrifice millions to keep power. World War 3 begins in one year if the rabid dog of Beijing isn’t put down.
46
241
11
899
25,030
Anh Nguyen retweeted
L’entrée de la Tour Eiffel est une honte pour la France. Un vrai #saccageparis😠 Cela devrait être notre plus belle vitrine. Avec l’IA en 5 min, un design en hommage à l’exposition universelle, le mobilier art nouveau pour cacher le mur anti-attentat, le jeu des perspectives.
Quand on est pas d’accord avec les choix esthétiques de Paris on se fait traiter de sale #saccageparis🙃 J’aime les arbres, les espaces piétons, j’aime Paris. Voici en IA la place de la République que j’aurai voulu (maintenant/après). Chers politiques, pourquoi tout ce moche?
86
254
26
2,439
905,497
Children left behind by U.S soldiers after the Vietnam war
202
1,017
94
10,823
1,519,093
Anh Nguyen retweeted
When Americans say "we could have nuked you," they are not defending a code of conduct. They are confessing that the only way they can imagine winning is extermination. A "general code of conduct" did not stop the U.S. from: Carpet bombing Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. Declaring free-fire zones where anything that moved could be shot. Dropping napalm on villages and watching children burn alive. Spraying Agent Orange over forests and farms, poisoning soil and generations. Running the Phoenix Program of torture and assassination. If that is your version of restraint, I do not want to see your version of "nothing's off limits." The reason the U.S. did not nuke Vietnam is not some chivalrous honor code. It is calculation. They understood that crossing that line, so soon after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, against a small agrarian country, in a war already tearing America apart at home and costing it moral capital abroad, could break more than it fixed. Not because we were "lucky," but because your system still needed a story about itself. You are also repeating the oldest lie of every occupier: "We lost because we were too gentle." The B-52s weren't gentle. The "body counts" weren't gentle. My Lai wasn't gentle. Neither were the villages that never made it into your newspapers. The free-fire zones, the strategic hamlets, and the bomb tonnage dropped on "Indochina," more than all fronts of World War II, were not "going only after the Viet Cong." And when you say "they hid among civilians," you erase the basic fact that shatters your whole framing: The "civilians" were the people fighting you. Farmers by day, fighters by night, because the war was on our soil. We did not commute to a distant battlefield. The battlefield was our rice field, our village, our river. Our home. You look at a society in arms and call it "hiding among civilians," because your worldview cannot process the idea that a whole people might refuse your right to be there. Your argument boils down to this: "We could have committed a bigger atrocity, therefore we didn't really lose." No. If the only way you can imagine "winning" is by nuking tens of millions of people off the map, what you are describing is not victory. It is the final bankruptcy of your own moral and political project. The U.S. lost in Vietnam because it hit the limit of what terror and technology could do against a people who refused to accept its script. You can daydream about hypothetical mushroom clouds if it soothes your pride. But out here, in the world you tried to bomb into submission, the bases are gone, the children are playing on your old runways, and history has already recorded what actually happened: You had the power to destroy our country. You did not have the power to make us surrender who we were.
Replying to @nxt888
You do know that they ‘lost’ because of a general code of conduct right? The US could have nuked the whole North Vietnam out of existence and nobody could stop it. Well, going only after the Viet Cong who hid among civilians as well while nothing’s offlimits to them is a different game altogether.
65
603
12
2,216
58,882
Ah shit here wo again 🥱
261
20,543
121
137,659
1,514,873
L'Europe sans immigrés...
67
669
244
2,781
1,209,706