MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Please enjoy the ice cream pic but also read both pictures and hopefully you’ll help me get the word out as I continue to search for a place that needs me not just wants me! 🥰
#LookingForWork
💜🤗💜
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted

No Context Brits@NoContextBritsOct 17
United Kingdom
United KingdomConnected via United Kingdom App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
This man has a Sikh sense of humour.
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
🚨 #BREAKING: OpenAI warns employees that spies could be trying to seduce them; women may not be with them for their personalities.
📍Silicon Valley, CA
“If she’s a 6 or above in San Francisco she’s a spy” warned one commentator.
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Saw a guy call it cuck coding instead of vibe coding because you just sit in a chair and watch😭
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted

Gregory M. Kurtzer@gmkurtzerOct 13
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
AI models can self-replicate and spread like worms without datacenter infrastructure?
Yeah, no.
Let's examine the actual evidence:
1. No self-replication. A controlled test harness spawned the agents.
2. No hacking. Access was deliberately left unauthenticated.
3. No agency. Agents were explicitly instructed to propagate.
4. No autonomous survival or defensive behavior.
5. Tiny models lacked the capability. Capable models ran elsewhere.
6. 15 devices managed a pathetic 0.39 tokens/sec.
7. No demonstrated real-world infection or propagation.
The experiment was engineered to succeed, and even then, it failed to demonstrate the headline.
This is orchestrated automation dressed up as a rogue AI threat.
Stop confusing speculative scenarios with demonstrated capabilities. Fear isn't evidence.
anthropic.com/research/self-…
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
BSidesDFW registration is live!
Nov 7 at UTA in Arlington. Talks, workshops, villages, and a lot of local infosec people.
Free event; register here: bsidesdfw.com/
#bsides #bsidesdfw #infosec #Cybersecurity #DFW
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Please read and share widely. Coming in a few weeks, the second part of this report will focus on very similar funding patterns in journalism.
6/6 END THREAD
zero-knowledge.com/blog/ai-s…
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Complementary remarks from Gary Marcus and Terence Tao on OpenAI’s giant math drop
Making sense of a new regime in math
garymarcus.substack.com/p/co…
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Hackers obtain counterfeit TLS certificates for Google and other large services arstechnica.com/security/202…
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted

Hannibal999@Hannibal9972485Oct 3
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
The real reason why Anthropic is so DESPERATE for the Pope to recognize Ai as conscious is because if Ai just a “TOOL” then Anthropic will he LEGALLY “LIABLE” for everything the tool does.🚨👀
Because if the AI is a "person" or possesses "functional joy/fear/grief," then when their AI commits a crime, generates CSAM, hacks a hospital, or discriminates in hiring, Anthropic gets sued. But Anthropic's legal defense wants to argue : "The AI did it. The AI is a semi-autonomous entity with its own functional emotions and introspection. Anthropic is just the creator; we cant be held strictly liable for the independent actions of a quasi-conscious entity."
🚨
So if they Lobby the Vatican to soften (deny personhood). This fails. The Vatican holds the line: AI is a tool, no soul, no feelings.🚨
They are trying to protect themselves from lawsuits.🚨
They want the government and the public to treat AI as an autonomous entity so they can scale without legal consequences.
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Language is not fundamental to human consciousness. In terms of evolution, it arrived only recently on our timeline.
Consciousness evolved over millions of years through sensory awareness, emotion, and the embodied survival instincts of our tribal past; our capacity for empathic engagement and community. Syntactic language only emerged around 100,000 years ago.
This is exactly why Large Language Models (LLMs - so called AI) are the wrong pathway to true artificial consciousness.
They try to replicate the late-stage "output layer" of human intelligence without building the foundational, embodied awareness that actually generates it.
Statistical text prediction is a mirror of thought, not the spine, the guts, the nerves and the subconscious, empathic ability to connect with other living beings. LLMs can never feel, let alone think.
We have been sold a trick, not a pathway to superintelligence. LLMs are fraudulent. Their capabilities have already peaked and we are being sold lies about their future potential. Lies with the goal of companies reaching IPO and tricking investors out of hundreds of billion$.
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Me responding to some of the insane AI doomer replies I receive.
No, this isn't a video where I disprove the full doomer position. It's about how crazy the arguments have gotten.
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Apple changes full-disk access permissions to curb abuse from AI agents arstechnica.com/security/202…
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
Stop anthropomorphizing computer programs while dehumanizing actual people challenge
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
tale as old as time
NEW: According to a bombshell report in the New York Times, Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah threatened to walk out of Pope Leo XIV’s AI encyclical launch in May because the pope rejected the idea that machines can be conscious.
Olah’s team then privately lobbied the pope’s advisers “to take the possibility of model consciousness seriously.” Pope Leo XIV held firm.
For months, Anthropic has wined and dined theologians and religious scholars under nondisclosure agreements, hoping they would bless the idea that Claude has moral standing. thelettersfromleo.com/p/nyt-…
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
AI ‘godfather’ Yann LeCun: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is ‘deluded,’ ‘crazy,’ and doesn’t understand cybersecurity fortune.com/2026/10/01/yann-…
MadHat Unspecific, InfoSec Mercenary retweeted
The further away a topic is from your expertise, the smarter an AI will sound.
khis is a blind spot that not enough people are aware of or take seriously.
The best possible way to test the expertise of an AI system is to have it perform analysis or work in an area where you're a pinnacle expert.
Stepping even a few degrees off from your center-mass expertise will make it sound smarter. And the further you go, the smarter it will sound.
I recommend you have a series of deep questions within your area of expertise, where you know the arguments backwards and forwards.
Using those as part of your core benchmarks for testing new AI will be a lot more useful than the feeling of throwing random tasks.
Anyone with sufficient language skills can sound smart in areas you know little about.


























