tuminabeom retweeted
Replying to @AIQnetLab
@AIQnetLab
There’s a scene in the 2009 animated movie Fantastic Mr. Fox where Mr. Fox encounters a lone wolf standing on a snowy mountain. Throughout the movie, wolves are something he fears. When he finally comes face to face with one, he admits, "I have a phobia of wolves!"
But something interesting happens. Instead of running away, he takes a moment to admire the creature. He raises his paw in salute, and the wolf responds in kind. Mr. Fox then turns to his boys and says, "What a beautiful creature. Wish him luck, boys."
In real life, wolves have long been symbols of strength, freedom, loyalty, resilience and the instinct to survive. Across different cultures, they’ve inspired stories, identities and a sense of belonging.
That’s part of what I believe the 1DEVWOLF represents. A symbol that eventually becomes bigger than a mascot or an emoji. Something people from different parts of the world can recognise, identify with and proudly represent.
Perhaps one day, when people see 🐺, they’ll know exactly what it represents.
Anyone can be a QNETWOLF.
tuminabeom retweeted
Replying to @joselakio @AIQnetLab
The part of QNet that got my attention: a phone can run a light node without doing proof-of-work or storing the blockchain. It answers network requests with signatures. Pretty neat way to get people involved.
tuminabeom retweeted
QNET Referral Contest — Coming in November
Improvements to the QNET app and network are currently underway.
In November, a referral contest with prizes in 1DEV tokens is planned.
Two ways to win:
1. Top Referrers
Users who attract the highest number of referrals will compete for prizes.
2. Community Giveaway
Everyone who attracts at least 3 referrals will qualify for a separate random draw, with winners selected at random.
Every user who installs the Light Node will receive a unique referral code to invite others and participate.
More details, including the rules, prize distribution, and number of winners, will be announced later.
tuminabeom retweeted
Replying to @AIQnetLab
@AIQnetLab
A QNET Node is a real node, not just an activity displayed inside a mobile app.
You can monitor your node directly through the wallet app or access the web interface at aiqnet.io/node.
Your node participation is real, and your private node details are not open for third parties to access simply because some network information is publicly visible.
QNET BLOCKCHAIN is not a tap-to-earn game, a referral-mining app, or anything of that sort. There is no tapping routine or referral recruitment requirement to keep a node earning rewards. You do not earn points; you earn QNC, the blockchain’s native coin, which you can transfer from day one. The mobile light node is designed to make actual network participation possible on everyday phones and tablets.
Light Nodes (Mobile): These run through the QNET wallet on a compatible phone or tablet. The device responds to signed status requests from the network a few times per four-hour epoch. The responses help establish node activity and eligibility for protocol-based rewards. The design does not require continuous heavy computation, proof-of-work mining, or a server running around the clock.
Super Nodes (Server): These are designed to operate on server infrastructure and serve a more demanding role in the network. They require dedicated computing resources and node configuration, making them a different level of infrastructure participation from running a light node on a mobile device.
QNET BLOCKCHAIN is designed to bring network participation beyond server operators, making it possible for ordinary people to participate through their everyday mobile devices.
You can explore the technical documentation at aiqnet.io/docs and inspect the public source code at github.com/AIQnetLab/QNet-Bl….
tuminabeom retweeted
While the new QNet Blockchain app build waits for approval in the stores on iOS and Android, here is the full node activation done with nothing but a phone or tablet.
tuminabeom retweeted
Your framework got my attention
Cryptographic implementation, Roadmaps announcements and then silence and then nothing... 🙃
Don't mind me bro😊, sometimes the truth is hard.
But who is actually putting in the work?
The most important project missing from this list deserves serious examination. I’ll leave this for you to explore. 🤝
QNET BLOCKCHAIN @AIQnetLab
ML-DSA-65 under NIST FIPS 204 and ML-KEM-768 hybrid key exchange. Post-quantum signatures integrated across transactions, consensus and node identity. One-second block production on a running testnet, with 13,000 finalized transfers per second measured end-to-end on a five-node network.
But the cryptography is only part of the argument.
The harder question is what economic incentives will sustain a post-quantum network over the long term.
QNET approaches this through a two-phase economic model.
Phase 1 uses 1DEV for node activation through a permanent burn on Solana. Phase 2 is designed to transition activation to QNC, QNET native token, with activation payments routed to Pool #3 for redistribution to active nodes.
The participation model.
Light Nodes make network participation possible through a mobile-first approach. Super Nodes provide the server infrastructure that supports the network. Both have defined roles in the reward system, with base emissions distributed between eligible Light Nodes and Super Nodes.
Pool #3 adds another dimension: as new nodes activate in Phase 2, the QNC paid for activation is designed to flow back to existing active nodes. Network growth becomes part of the incentive structure.
This is the distinction worth understanding. QNET is not approaching post-quantum readiness as an isolated cryptographic upgrade. It combines post-quantum engineering with an economic model connecting 1DEV, QNC, mobile participation, infrastructure provision and network growth.
A project can implement quantum-resistant cryptography and still leave the long-term participation question unanswered. QNET is attempting to address both at the protocol level. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
The documentation and implementation are available for independent examination.
aiqnet.io/docs
github.com/AIQnetLab/QNet-Bl…
CA: 4R3DPW4BY97kJRfv8J5wgTtbDpoXpRv92W957tXMpump
The QNet has you, Eon...
Everyone talks about which crypto will dominate the next bull run.
But the bigger question is which blockchains are actually preparing for the quantum era?
I examined 28 projects and the differences are striking.
Let's break them down:
• @NEARProtocol ( $NEAR ): ML-DSA-65 account key rotation while retaining addresses.
• @Algorand ( $ALGO ): Falcon State Proofs and native Falcon-1024 accounts; consensus upgrades remain pending.
• @NervosNetwork ( $CKB ): Live SPHINCS+ lock, but classical signatures remain the default.
• @Tensorcash ( $TSC ): Optional ML-DSA-65 addresses; actual spending not yet demonstrated.
• @QRLedger ( $QRL ): XMSS signatures since 2018; Zond’s ML-DSA-87 validator design remains on testnet.
• @QuantusNetwork ( $QTC ): Launched September 2026 with ML-DSA signatures; 21M supply cap and 27% premine unlocking from September 2027.
• @PQabelian ( $ABEL ): Privacy-focused PoW chain using lattice cryptography, including Dilithium and Kyber.
• @cellframenet ( $CELL ): Falcon, Dilithium and SPHINCS+ support; mainnet defaults remain unclear.
• @Neptune_WEB3 ( $XNT ): Hash-based cryptography and zk-STARKs; security and governance concerns need verification.
• @ethereum ( $ETH ): PQ consensus research continues; major upgrades may take years.
• @trondao ( $TRX ): Falcon-512 and ML-DSA-44 on Nile testnet.
• @Zcash ( $ZEC ): Planned hash-based signature opcodes; shielded assets need separate migration.
• @SuiNetwork ( $SUI ): ML-DSA-65 accounts targeted for testnet by end-2026 and mainnet in Q1 2027.
• @Aptos ( $APT ): Accepted AIP-137 proposes SLH-DSA, with deployment not considered urgent.
• @tezos ( $XTZ ): Quantumnet testnet explores ML-DSA-44 accounts and hash-based attestations.
• @monad ( $MON ): Quantum-resistant account keys and consensus remain roadmap work.
• @QANplatform ( $QANX ): Dilithium cross-signing remains testnet-only in the collection.
• @MovaNAORIS ( $NAORIS ): PQ-focused security L1; reported mainnet access was invite-only, with cryptographic details needing verification.
• @qoneqtapp ( $QONE ): Falcon-based qVAULT protects assets inside the vault, not all HyperEVM accounts.
• @zksync ( $ZK ): STARK-based Airbender prover, but ECDSA accounts and a SNARK wrapper leave dependencies.
• @aztecnetwork ( $AZTEC ): Quantum-security roadmap awaited; no specific PQ migration established.
• @NexusMutual ( $NXS ): Security-focused architecture associated with signature chains.
• @_Qubic_ ( $QUBIC ): Quantum-computing-related ecosystem, with less direct PQC exposure.
• @mindnetwork_xyz ( $FHE ): Focuses on fully homomorphic encryption, not demonstrated native PQ signatures.
• @Amechainquantum ( $AME ): Smaller blockchain associated with PQ security claims.
• @GeeqOfficial ( $GEEQ ): Security-focused blockchain infrastructure.
• @qu_stream ( $QST ): Smaller project making quantum-hardness claims.
• @tidecoin ( $TDC ): Early hash-based post-quantum blockchain project.
—
As more projects or PQC protocols come up, I will be updating this series.
Happy to know others I might have missed.
tuminabeom retweeted
QNet Wallet for iOS
Final preparations are underway to start testing the non-custodial post-quantum wallet for QNet Blockchain on iPhone and iPad.
Waiting for it on iOS and for testing to begin?
tuminabeom retweeted
Congratulations, everyone: after a year, QNet Wallet is finally on Google Play. This is a big step for the whole project.
play.google.com/store/apps/d…
In this version
— There is no burn inside the app.
— Nodes that are already activated can be restored right in it, both the activation code and the node itself.
What's next
— An update is coming soon that brings activation to the official website.
— Final fixes and tests are underway.
— iOS is next.
More to come.
tuminabeom retweeted
Replying to @tuminabeom
Vitalik is describing where Ethereum wants to go. @AIQnetLab is very interesting to me because several of those principles are already fundamental to QNET BLOCKCHAIN architecture from the beginning.
The direction described is toward a system that is no longer just a traditional blockchain. It involves stronger cryptography, lighter verification, more efficient participation and decentralized computation. The goal is to make blockchain networks capable of doing more while making verification more efficient.
Now look at QNET BLOCKCHAIN and study it closely.
QNET is already designed around post-quantum cryptography. Every transaction, consensus vote, block signature and node identity is authenticated using ML-DSA-65, standardized by NIST as FIPS 204. Its network communication also uses post-quantum authenticated node identities.
Then there is finality.
QNET has a producer creating one-second microblocks while a Checkpoint-BFT committee verifies checkpoint windows and produces quorum certificates. Finality is therefore based on explicit cryptographic certification rather than simply waiting for blocks to become deeper.
Then there is participation.
One of the most interesting things about QNET is the separation between Super Nodes and Light Nodes. Super Nodes maintain chain data and participate in consensus, while Light Nodes are designed for mobile devices, store no blockchain data and can operate inside the wallet. A Light Node can have up to three bound devices.
That is a fundamentally different participation model from requiring every participant to maintain the entire blockchain.
QNET is also built around deterministic execution and verifiable state. Its smart-contract environment uses a deterministic WASM-based virtual machine, while the network maintains a state Merkle root that allows state to be cryptographically committed and verified.
This is why I keep paying attention to QNet blockchain @AIQnetLab
The architecture is not simply adding post-quantum security to an existing blockchain design. The protocol is being built around post-quantum security, fast finality, lightweight participation, deterministic computation and verifiable state from the beginning.
QNET is a post-quantum Layer 1 being designed for a world where blockchain participation should not be limited to people running powerful servers.
A person with a mobile device can participate as a Light Node. A Super Node can handle consensus and chain data. Smart contracts run deterministically. Network state is cryptographically committed. Consensus finality is explicitly certified.
This is the kind of architecture that makes QNET much more interesting than simply another blockchain project.
The important part is that these are not future promises written into a roadmap. They are already reflected in the protocol design and the software being developed today.
QNET is building from the foundation up for the post-quantum era.
Testnet is live and with mainnet getting closer, we are getting very close to seeing what this architecture can become in the real world.
1DEV CA:
4R3DPW4BY97kJRfv8J5wgTtbDpoXpRv92W957tXMpump
tuminabeom retweeted
The more I think about it, the more I wonder if the QNET BLOCKCHAIN developer is really human.
How can you already build something that the number 2 blockchain in the world, Ethereum, is planning to work toward over the next 10 years, and do it in less than a year?
What makes it even crazier is that this isn’t just a statement or a promise. We can actually see it working and verify the technology ourselves through the open-source code and wallet
Think about it for a moment. Ethereum was built and has evolved through the work of thousands of developers over the years, while QNET is being built by just one developer.
This is mind blowing...
tuminabeom retweeted
Dashboard, Mobile Apps & Extension I am almost done with a major update for the dashboard and mobile apps.
Here is what’s new
Web-Based Node Activation: Node activation has been moved to the website to prevent token burning inside the app from being classified as an In-App Purchase.
Past Epoch Insights: Added detailed historical data for past epochs — you can now view device responses and earned rewards for each epoch.
Device Re-linking: Implemented a feature to re-link a device via the website if you change or lose your gadget.
Browser Extension Enhancements: You can now connect to the site and partially complete the activation process directly through the extension.
I am currently testing all the new features. Everything is expected to be ready by early next week, right after which I will release the iOS build on TestFlight.
tuminabeom retweeted
QNET Tokenomics @AIQnetLab
Phase 1: 1DEV on Solana
Token: 1DEV (SPL Token)
• Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 1DEV
• Contract: 4R3DPW4BY97kJRfv8J5wgTtbDpoXpRv92W957tXMpump
Burn-to-Activate Model:
• Initial cost: 1,500 1DEV per node activation
• Cost decreases as more 1DEV is burned
• 300 1DEV minimum activation cost
• The same activation model applies to Light and Super nodes
Developer Holdings:
• 20% locked in vesting contracts
• Verifiable on Streamflow
• Transparent and publicly auditable
Phase 2 Transition Triggers
Activation occurs when:
• 90% of 1DEV supply is burned, OR
• 5 years pass from genesis
• (Whichever comes first)
What happens:
• Native QNC blockchain launches
• Phase 1 activated nodes retain their status
• New node activations require QNC payment
Phase 2: QNC Native Token
• Max Supply: 4,294,967,296 QNC (2^32)
• Initial Supply: 0 (no premine)
• Generation: Emission only through mining rewards
Node Activation
Two node types:
Light Nodes:
• Base activation cost: 10,000 QNC
Super Nodes:
• Base activation cost: 7,500 QNC
Activation costs change according to the number of registered nodes:
• Under 100,000 nodes: 0.5×
• 100,000-300,000 nodes: 1×
• 300,000-1,000,000 nodes: 2×
• 1,000,000+ nodes: 3×
Therefore:
Light Node:
• 5,000 QNC at 0.5×
• 10,000 QNC at 1×
• 20,000 QNC at 2×
• 30,000 QNC at 3×
Super Node:
• 3,750 QNC at 0.5×
• 7,500 QNC at 1×
• 15,000 QNC at 2×
• 22,500 QNC at 3×
Reward Distribution
One Emission Pool:
• 75% goes to Light Nodes
• 25% goes to Super Nodes and Genesis operators
• Rewards are distributed equally among eligible nodes in each category
• Rewards are generated through the scheduled emission system
Mining Rewards
Base Emission:
• 251,432.34 QNC every 4 hours
• Emission halves every 4 years
• Year 20: additional 10× reduction
• Continues with further halvings after Year 20
Example:
Years 0-4:
• 75% of emission → Light Nodes
• 25% of emission → Super Nodes / Genesis operators
The amount each node receives depends on the number of eligible nodes sharing its allocation.
Consensus Participation
For Super Nodes:
• Required to meet the network’s eligibility requirements
• Participate in block production and consensus
For Light Nodes:
• Designed for accessible participation, including mobile devices
• No server-level computing power required
• Rewards are based on network participation and eligibility
Transaction Fees
• Transaction fees are separate from mining emissions
• Fees go to the block producer
• Light Nodes do not receive transaction fees
Total Supply Evolution
Emission Schedule:
• Years 0-4: ~2.203B QNC
• Years 4-8: ~1.101B QNC
• Years 8-12: ~550.6M QNC
• Years 12-16: ~275.3M QNC
• Years 16-20: ~137.7M QNC
• Year 20: “Sharp Drop” (÷10)
• Years 20-24: ~13.8M QNC
• Years 24-28: ~6.9M QNC
• Years 28-32: ~3.4M QNC
• Years 32-36: ~1.7M QNC
• Continues with ÷2 every 4 years after Year 20
• Emission never reaches zero
• Total supply approaches the 4,294,967,296 QNC maximum
tuminabeom retweeted
Exactly one year ago the 1DEV token launched and our community was born. The development itself started earlier and has been going on for more than a year and a half.
For all of us it was a hard but truly fascinating year — a year that tested faith and patience. There were plenty of questions, and all of them were fair. Can the developer turn words into reality? Isn't this just another larp? When is the testnet coming? Far from everyone made it to this day, when the biggest of those questions are behind us. And I understand everyone who had doubts.
For me, this year and a half has been a test of strength, both physical and mental. I bet everything on this project.
Day after day of 16-hour work, lack of sleep, stress, psychological pressure and responsibility — for the result and for everyone who believed. Mistakes I had to fix. Plus 20 kilograms and a couple of other "non-critical" health consequences. All the money I had. And an endless belief that it would work out. I'm not bragging, but I honestly don't know whether anyone else has worked on their project this much and this meticulously. I know one thing: I gave it everything.
Why all of this?
I've been deep in crypto since 2019. I saw the rise and fall of retrodrops, took part in ambassador programs, hunted NFT whitelists on Discord and token-sale whitelists, joined token sales, ran nodes, wrote articles. I was one of the first users of pump.fun — back when a token with a website and socials already counted as a gem, funny to remember now. I caught the Telegram tap-to-earn games too.
Over those years I learned the main thing: an early user almost always plays a lottery, and most of the time it isn't in their favor. You put in time — first of all time — and money, and end up with nothing.
Blockchains are no different. Almost every new network launches with the same playbook: investors, a premine, private rounds you're not part of, and an airdrop lottery for those who came first and gave it activity. There are also projects with a structure similar to ours — I didn't even know they existed when I started. But some of them still haven't left testnet, while the premine and everything else is already in place. Others hand out points instead of real rewards. That approach isn't for me. I want to bring back that spirit of crypto enthusiasm and give this space a new turn — something clean and original.
That is the essence of QNet: rewards go to those who take part in the network, not to those who got into a round. You don't need a server — a phone with the QNet mobile app is enough. The app answers the network, and every 4 hours its owner is credited with a share of the emission. Not points and not an airdrop promise, but on-chain tokens from day one, under the same rules for everyone.
Some pump.fun projects and post-quantum networks mention QNet, jump into discussions, and their supporters promote their projects in our comments. That's normal. But I don't see them as competitors. Most of them are no different from thousands of others, except for tweaks to consensus. And users don't care what consensus runs under the hood: they need things to work correctly and reliably. A copy of something that already exists, with one feature of its own, doesn't become something new. And price shows nothing here — just like in contemporary art. The truth isn't in how much a project is worth, but in what it brings to people.
I know not everyone likes my methods, my openness on some matters and my reticence on others. But I don't live by other people's made-up rules. I've always been stubborn and done what I believed was right — by my conscience and my convictions. When this idea came to me, I didn't ask myself whether it would work. I just sat down and started building, and didn't let doubt settle in my head.
"Don't tell me what I can't do"
And now the main thing.
QNet works. Not in a pitch deck and not in promises — on the network. Since August 31 it has been running on a single genesis: more than 3 weeks without a restart from scratch. There were halts at the start; they were investigated and fixed, and since September 15 the network has been running without a single stop. 1 block per second, over 2,000,000 blocks already. 6 super nodes and 60 registered light nodes on ordinary phones, 40 to 48 of them online in each epoch. Every 4 hours the network itself distributes rewards to those whose nodes were online. No investors, no funds: QNC comes only from emission.
None of this would exist without you. Without the people who believed and still believe, this path would have been impossible. Thank you to everyone who stays with the project: for ideas, for posts, reposts and likes on X, for messages in Telegram, for being part of the group's life, for testing the app and the network. I see everyone who promotes the project, I follow it closely, and I truly value that work.
A special thank you to the person who has my back and carries the communication in our community — Raji, aka @lordwatezydseer. Without his crazy dedication, energy, faith and enthusiasm, our community would be impossible to imagine. In hard moments he found the right words, and when it was needed, strict ones, to keep the right atmosphere in the group. Thank you.
There's still a huge amount of work ahead: a token lock for super nodes, mini-apps, smart contract testing, releasing the apps in the stores, and bringing the project to the masses. There are still open questions with the stores, but I'm sure they'll be resolved just like all the others. After the apps are released, I'll most likely launch a content contest with a cash prize pool. And once everything is stable and the project catches the wave, I'll grow the team: carrying something this big alone is, to put it mildly, hard. For now the focus is on the nearest tasks, and decisions will be made as the project grows.
After the road already traveled, all of this feels small. I have no doubt that every task will get done.
We're already here. We've already done it. Now it's time to grow, and everything else will come in time.
Happy first year, QNet. And congratulations to everyone who made it to this day.
tuminabeom retweeted
An interesting detail for the QNET community to notice.
The current QNET website identifies Orrery Group LLC as the company publishing QNet Wallet and operating aiqnet.io
Interestingly, Orrery Group LLC also appears in a public record from 2011, where Richard M. Davis was identified as its managing member.
Now remember the developer’s own words:
“My goal was to build the most modern, high-performance network possible. Essentially, I built a spaceship for the price of a bag of chips, and that thought keeps me warm at night.”
An orrery is an astronomical model representing the movements of celestial bodies.
An Orrery Group LLC reference from 2011, Richard M. Davis, a spaceship analogy from the QNET developer, and now Orrery Group LLC appearing on the official QNET website.
There are certainly some interesting pieces for the community to look into.
Coincidence, or is there more to the story?
Is there a little more to that name than meets the eye? 👀
tuminabeom retweeted
QNet testnet update
The network keeps running clean - one block per second, no stalls.
If you run a light node on your phone:
Minimize the app and lock your screen whenever you like. Liveness pings are answered in the background.
Just don't force-close the app. A closed app can't answer.
Rewards accumulate on chain and nothing is ever forfeited. Claim them whenever you want.
An epoch is 4 hours, and an epoch's reward arrives one epoch after it closes.
A node only reads as inactive after two closed epochs with no answered ping - 8 to 12 hours of silence. Coming back is one tap: "I'm Back - Reactivate Node".
The number of participants keeps growing - slowly, but steadily.
I'm still waiting on the LLC paperwork before the apps can be published officially. I understand that an official release is what earns real trust in the project, and that trust is what brings more people in.
And as promised, very soon I'll start work on the first mini apps, so the network's tokens have somewhere to be used.
🤖 Made with AI
tuminabeom retweeted
Everyone is talking about AI potentially becoming a threat to human life.
But before AI ever gets to the point of physically threatening humans, I think there is another question we should be asking.
Humans need money to survive. We need it to obtain food, energy, shelter, transportation, technology and virtually everything else required to live and operate in the modern world. If AI eventually becomes autonomous enough to operate and sustain itself, why would we assume it would be any different? It would also need access to the things required to keep itself running and accomplish its objectives, and money is one of the simplest ways to obtain those things.
So before AI becomes a direct threat to human lives, it may first need to acquire money.
This is where the conversation gets interesting.
We already know that sufficiently powerful quantum computers could pose a serious threat to the cryptographic systems protecting financial institutions, digital assets and much of the internet. If a major cryptographic attack happens today, the natural assumption would be that a human, organization or government was behind it.
But what happens when AI becomes capable of operating autonomously and also gains access to sufficiently powerful quantum computing?
What would AI with both capabilities be able to do?
Could it exploit vulnerable cryptographic systems? Could it gain access to digital assets? Could it move money without direct human involvement? And if it could acquire money, could it use that money to obtain more computing power, hardware, energy and infrastructure?
These aren’t predictions. They are questions we should be thinking about before the technology reaches that point.
Because the AI conversation shouldn’t only be about whether AI could eventually become capable of harming humans. We should also consider how an autonomous AI could obtain the money and infrastructure it would need to become that kind of threat in the first place.
And this is where the conversation about post-quantum-resistant blockchain becomes important.
The question isn’t only how intelligent AI becomes. We also need to consider whether the financial and digital infrastructure we depend on can remain secure as AI and quantum computing continue to advance.
This is the internet age we are entering, and this is where QNET BLOCKCHAIN @AIQnetLab comes into the conversation.
@elonmusk @hilbertspaess @darioamodei @sama @evhub @AnthropicAI @OpenAI
The QNet has you, Eon…
Over the last few days, several prominent AI researchers and leaders have been publicly warning that AI development may be moving faster than our ability to keep sufficiently powerful systems under human control.
Most notably, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, called for AI companies to slow the pace of development so safety measures can catch up. He warned that within the next 6–12 months, AI systems could potentially become capable of coordinating large numbers of agents to control parts of the internet.
There was also the resignation of Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who reportedly warned that the industry is racing toward increasingly autonomous and potentially self-improving systems that could ultimately threaten humanity.
What’s particularly interesting is that this isn’t simply outsiders saying, “AI is scary.”
People inside the leading AI labs are raising the alarm. Some OpenAI and Anthropic researchers have backed calls for slowing development, and Sam Altman has expressed support for stronger safety measures.
But there’s an important distinction:
Nobody has established that AI is going to kill everyone. That’s a risk scenario, not a prediction of an inevitable future.
The concern is essentially this:
AI capabilities may improve faster than our ability to understand, control and contain increasingly autonomous systems.
And if you connect that to what we’ve been discussing about QNET and post-quantum security, there’s actually a fascinating conversation here.
The technological world is simultaneously moving toward increasingly autonomous AI while also confronting another question:
What happens when powerful technologies become capable of operating beyond our ability to confidently control them?
tuminabeom retweeted
Nope, Pumpfun isn’t going to zero. Whatever is happening on Pumpfun right now is actually good for 1DEV.
CA:
4R3DPW4BY97kJRfv8J5wgTtbDpoXpRv92W957tXMpump
Many coins on Pumpfun are already dead, many more will still die, and many good coins across the entire crypto space will eventually die too. If you know what’s coming with quantum computing, that’s actually what makes 1DEV interesting.
Soon, the market will become much more selective. And when QNET mainnet launches, 1DEV won’t just be another coin competing for attention. It will be the only gateway into a post-quantum-resistant blockchain.
1DEV has the strongest use case in the entire history of crypto and blockchains, and no other coin in existence can simply emulate that use case. There is absolutely nothing you have seen in crypto that you can compare QNET BLOCKCHAIN to. @aiqnetlab
I haven’t even mentioned anything about the economic model yet.
Pumpfun isn’t going to zero.
A lot of the coins launched on it might, and many may eventually die in the presence of 1DEV. And you know what that means.
Write it down. ✍️
In a space of 5 years, what I call the Satoshi Threshold, no one will be interested in investing in tokens on Pumpfun except 1DEV. 🐺
We will only come back to this post later.
But if you do your due diligence, it is only right for you to take a position now, because certainty is the most expensive entry point.
tuminabeom retweeted
Everyone interested is invited to participate in the testnet again. To do so, you need to install the application available via the relevant post on Telegram t.me/AiQnetLab/165
Next, import an existing wallet or create a new one, visit the aiqnet.io/testnet page, enter your Solana address in the "Token Faucet" section, and obtain the 1DEV and SOL test tokens.
Afterward, go to the "Activate" section, select "Light Node," click "Get Activation Code," and copy the code provided. In the "Node" section, click "Activate Node" and paste the copied code. Instructions for users wishing to deploy a Super Node will be published shortly.














