MTS @MicrosoftAI working on frontier VLM training and multimodal reinforcement learning. ML Theory PhD @GeorgiaTech, Math BS @USC.

Atlanta, GA
Joined December 2019
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Exciting 3T native multimodal pretraining happening at @MicrosoftAI! Post-training 🔜
We now have state-of-the-art pre-trained base models in the 3T-parameter weight class, built entirely in-house at MAI. Post-training results coming soon -- stay tuned! Lots of details in our technical blog post. microsoft.ai/news/frontier-p…
5
290
Congrats Dylan! Berkeley is lucky to have you!
1
260
This work has been accepted to NeurIPS 2026 - see you in Atlanta!
New paper — the last and best from my PhD! We show the first end-to-end feature learning analysis of how neural networks overfit to spurious correlations. Our theory implies phase transitions in SGD learning dynamics that match empirical results. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2606.30444
2
35
6,010
Replying to @sid_devic
I somehow missed this when you posted, but very nice and thoughtful writeup echoing my own decision to "leave" theory. It's also interesting to think about the role of the new-age theoretician as more interpretive/expositional as AI proofs need to be communicated and organized.
1
11
I've transitioned to Member of Technical Staff @MicrosoftAI focused on frontier VLM training and multimodal reinforcement learning. Looking forward to an exciting new chapter!
1
1
40
1,064
Replying to @GrantStenger
Compaction still sucks
1
8
242
I still wonder whether they'll make a comeback. I think they'd make much better skill docs than the typical SKILL.md which just has text. Combining instructions, code with verified outputs, and charts/plots... seems pretty powerful and I haven't seen anyone thinking about it
3
51
Replying to @jxbz
Congrats really cool work! And great to see a strong new open-weight model family
1
132
Replying to @ajonelagadda
Thanks! (And that's a nice paper!) Yes, I think there is promise in SDE and mean field-type approaches for spurious feature learning. Of note, our Phase II spurious evolution is closely related to the classical ODE dot(x) = x * e^-(x^2).
121
Replying to @_Suresh2
Good question: this is the online setting (fresh data at every step), so no such thing as full-batch GD. This is to avoid data reuse, mostly for mathematical convenience. With that said, the code wouldn't be too hard to extend to full-batch GD: github.com/tmlabonte/xor
1
77
Replying to @fabianfranz
Our theory requires the % of minority group data (i.e. data with the spurious feature) to go to zero, to guarantee total dependence on the spurious feature. OTOH, if the % is constant, our experiments show the true signal (blue) can eventually surpass the spurious signal (green)
105
Overall we believe this is a step towards a rigorous foundation for popular robustness algorithms like Just Train Twice and Deep Feature Reweighting, and could even inform new robust interventions. This paper was the result of a wonderful collaboration with @v__muthukumar!
2
260
Even more interesting, if the spurious correlation is sufficiently weak, we show empirically that the XOR signal can eventually be learned. (Though the spurious feature is not forgotten!)
1
2
313
Compared to learning the XOR in isolation, the spurious correlation introduces shockingly nonlinear interdependencies which complicate learning dynamics. As a consequence, the spurious feature isn’t just learned earlier, but exponentially slows signal feature learning.
1
2
392
Deep learning theory is hard, and most papers have to simplify the model or algorithm — think NTK or layer-wise SGD. Instead, we simplify the data! Our setting, a quadratic XOR signal with linear shortcut, is one of the simplest where spurious feature learning can be observed.
1
1
6
771
New paper — the last and best from my PhD! We show the first end-to-end feature learning analysis of how neural networks overfit to spurious correlations. Our theory implies phase transitions in SGD learning dynamics that match empirical results. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2606.30444
5
4
2
83
12,368
Very cool work from new colleagues at @ms_aifrontiers: most LLM benchmarks are redundant!
Most LLM benchmark scores are predictable before you ever run them. New from the MS AI Frontiers team: BenchPress. The 84-model × 133-benchmark score matrix turns out to be effectively rank-2, so matrix completion fills in the rest. 5 probes recover a model's whole profile. Paper, code, demo 👇
1
500
Replying to @v__muthukumar
Thanks Vidya! It was truly a pleasure to collaborate with and learn from you!
114